[Poohbah]

Reasonable explanations have covered all the evidence so far.

Dude, they're reasonable only to those who with IQs in the "OJ jurors range."

[UCANSEE2]

You know, from earlier discussions, I thought you were above this tactic. Guess I was wrong.

[Henrietta]

The defense has the burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt (or to a "moral certainty" for those who read LaFave) that DW killed Danielle. It is not the responsibility of the defense to prove that he didn't do it. You seem to have the burdens mixed up, oh grand Poohbah.

[UCANSEE2]

I guess if you can't answer the question, you just make a personal attack, huh?

[fatima]

Dear Poohbah,you have now enter into The Twilight Zone where most posters thing he is not guilty,that's right poohbah ,but rest assured there are a few that thing this man had porn,blood of the girl and have questions,but the twilight thread think's we are crazy.