To: Poohbah
I agree. The witness does not come off as an "expert" witness ought to, IMO.
To: cyncooper
I agree. The witness does not come off as an "expert" witness ought to, IMO.This is the second time you have said this.
Sounds like a sound bite from CTV and Nancy Grace.
How should an 'expert' witness come off, to sound right to you? What, in particular, is he doing wrong?
23 posted on
07/22/2002 3:27:52 PM PDT by
UCANSEE2
To: cyncooper
IMHO if Haskell is judged to have no credibility, then the whole forensic entomology field may as well be flushed.
He's pretty much the king of the hill where forensic entomology is concerned.
63 posted on
07/22/2002 3:52:36 PM PDT by
El Sordo
To: cyncooper
I agree. The witness does not come off as an "expert" witness ought to, IMO.
I totally disagree with you. I thought he was very knowledgeable and explained everything patiently and thoroughly.
154 posted on
07/22/2002 4:40:58 PM PDT by
It's me
To: cyncooper
It's such garbage this "battle of the expert$" crap.
Henry Lee testified for O.J., big deal. Yeah he's innocent.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson