Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This kind of thinking just blows my mind.
1 posted on 07/22/2002 7:28:06 AM PDT by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: vannrox
Let him run. Spring 2004 the RAT contenders will be bickering with each other over gay rights, gun controls, tax increases and slavery reparations. The American people will appropriately recoil.

Just desserts for a bunch of corrupt, scheming liars.

2 posted on 07/22/2002 7:32:15 AM PDT by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vannrox
Howard Dean like Walter Mondale thinks we need to have our taxes raised. Oh goody.... let's see him make the argument on the campaign trail on the way to a landslide loss. Lucky for us, liberals like Dean never do learn from history. People don't like politicians who want to raise their taxes, period.
3 posted on 07/22/2002 7:34:37 AM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vannrox
More mind-numbing, state-worshipping, socialist thought from democRATS.
From the governor of the only state in the union to elect a member of the Socialist Party to Congress.
What an idiot.
And dangerous.
An enemy of our free republic.

4 posted on 07/22/2002 7:34:50 AM PDT by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vannrox
Someone get the plunger. The toilet is stopped up and these "floaters" are starting to stink.
5 posted on 07/22/2002 7:35:11 AM PDT by isthisnickcool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vannrox
Ever since George McGovern rewrote the 'rat convention rules after the 1968 Chicago fiasco, every 'rat presidential hopeful has had to run far, far left in hopes of getting the support of hard core primary voters and the interest group blocs at the convention. Once nominated, the candidate then tries to blur his positions for the public, while privately assuring the interest groups that he is with them (which is true), and relies on the media arm of the party to pass him off to the public as a moderate. No 'rat candidate can ever reach the White House except through a program of continual lying to the public.
7 posted on 07/22/2002 7:40:44 AM PDT by thucydides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vannrox
We could repeal payments to the UN, to the National Education Association, the IRS, and to the War on Drugs, and fund universal health care too. Not that I advocate it, just pointing out that all the government really wants in more control over the people and their money, not to help the people. "Helping People" is just the excuse they use to gain more control.
8 posted on 07/22/2002 7:45:31 AM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vannrox
This guy gets the "OINK" award for best pork proposal!
9 posted on 07/22/2002 7:46:36 AM PDT by JoeSixPack1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vannrox
Dean acknowledged that most Americans would not want to give up their tax cut. But if those same voters were asked to relinquish the ''few hundred dollars or the $20 or $30 that I got in that tax cut in order to have decent roads, decent schools, and a decent health care system,'' they would support it, Dean said.

Let me say this once again, "It ain't the cost, it is the upkeep!" A tax cut gives money back to the system to be either saved or spent by the person who earned it. This idjit wants my money to start a nationalized health system that he purports would only cost half of the tax cut. There is no social welfare scheme that has ever stayed within budget or timeframe. Look at the initial debates on Social Security or Medicare and all of the assurances from the proponents about how innocuous the tax cost would be. Then look at what people like O'Neil, Pepper and Gibbons et.al. did with the 'free' money to 'help' their constituants.

Look at the 'successes' in Sweden, Britain and Canada and look at how much government control there is over medical care. Add to this the fact that one of the Dem's largest contributors are the Trial Lawyers who will demand the right to continue malpractice cases and I see the worst of both worlds. Give me a BREAK!

11 posted on 07/22/2002 7:53:11 AM PDT by SES1066
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vannrox
Why doesn't Dean just propose a state tax increase for Vermont to make up for their lost federal assistance?

Oh,yeah, I forgot, they want other peoples money to fund their little socialist experiment.

12 posted on 07/22/2002 7:54:23 AM PDT by kaboom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vannrox
actually, President Bush might have to push to get the tax cut repealed if he wants to keep creating new branches of government. The citizen spy programs won't be free, either.

Although it would be sad to see the tax cut go. It's one of the very few things that he has done right.
14 posted on 07/22/2002 8:02:44 AM PDT by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vannrox
Vermont should be expelled from the US.
15 posted on 07/22/2002 8:20:35 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vannrox
Doesn't blow mine. I have yet, as an upper bracket tax payer to really feel any impact. THIS kind of thinking is typical of the socialist elite. May they all burn in hell.
16 posted on 07/22/2002 8:22:55 AM PDT by Nuke'm Glowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vannrox
I wonder how much of his personal money he has contributed to others health care.

What an idiot !!

17 posted on 07/22/2002 8:25:13 AM PDT by unixfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vannrox
If he runs, all his opponents have to say is, Howard Dean thinks you're undertaxed. There may be a very few out there (rich liberals) who would agree and would vote for him regardless, but most of us, and especially anyone who really works for a living and who seemingly pay some kind of tax at every turn, would not.
19 posted on 07/22/2002 8:32:09 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vannrox
"I think the president's tax cut is costing us a fortune."

Who is "us"?

"I think most of the president's tax cut ought to be repealed. It's very bad economic policy,'' Dean said. The governor was highly critical of Bush's economic policy - which he said recalled the ''voodoo economics'' of the president's father - and suggested that the president's foreign policy experience was limited."

Morons never learn, do they?

How about cutting taxes so everyone can afford their own health insurance? How about stop discriminating against the "rich" by setting a flat tax rate? The government should not be telling people what they "can or cannot afford" for the reasoning of the tax code. A progressive income tax is unconstitutional.

20 posted on 07/22/2002 8:37:27 AM PDT by rudypoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vannrox
Should be kept in mind by those thinking Bush should be pushing for more tax cuts. The left has won some serious intellectual territory on the tax cut front, there just isn't the support to get more cuts, we'll be lucky to keep the ones he got through.
24 posted on 07/22/2002 8:50:04 AM PDT by discostu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: vannrox
Repealing a TaxCut is the same as Raising Taxes...I hope the RATS include this politically-suicidal proposal in their Party Platform, 'cuz it'll be a disaster for them!!

FReegards...MUD

27 posted on 07/22/2002 12:24:55 PM PDT by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson