To: homeschool mama
If anything, my opinion of him is even higher. Michael Newdow is meeting his requirements for child support despite the fact that the mother of his child tried to remove him from his child's life by moving 3,000 miles away and despite the fact that child support is almost double his income. Not only that, but it seems that the mother of his child was lying when she claimed the 9th Circuit Court decision came as a big surprise.
Rubin joined Newdow and his daughter when he presented oral arguments about the Pledge of Allegiance to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.
Newdow took his daughter for the experience but says she doesn't have to share his beliefs.
So here we have a father who completely uproots his life and pays out nearly double his income for his child, and a woman who is bending over backwards to deprive his daughter of her father, even to the point of lying to the press and the American public to garner sympathy and ammunition in her battle to deprive their daughter of her father.
Michael Newdow, whatever else he may be, should serve as a walking advertisement to American men to be careful whom they open their lives to, in case they end up sharing a child with a fatherhood hating feminazi.
21 posted on
07/16/2002 4:35:26 PM PDT by
flyervet
To: flyervet
If his court ordered child support is $24k per year...and he earned a mere $15k a year how is he possibly meeting his child support? Can you say DEADBEAT?!
He claims to work reduced hours in order to continue his lawsuits against the government (under God). Perhaps his real intent to to make the life of his daughter's mother...and thus his daughter...miserable.
Your admiration of Newdow is frightening.
To: flyervet
**Michael Newdow, whatever else he may be, should serve as a walking advertisement to American men to be careful whom they open their lives to, in case they end up sharing a child with a fatherhood hating feminazi. **
The mother is not a feminazi. How dare you. You know NOTHING about the people involved in this case. What hateful beliefs you hold. What a sorry and bitter life you must lead. I have the utmost of pity for you. What a loss.
To: flyervet
Michael Newdow is meeting his requirements for child support despite the fact that the mother of his child tried to remove him from his child's life by moving 3,000 miles away and despite the fact that child support is almost double his income. He only made $15K last year because he chose to only work two days a week. By all appearances, he's obsessed. That's not a positive characteristic for a father.
IF he really wanted to see his daughter more often, he would start by moving closer to her. No, this man's a self-centered sperm donor.
To: flyervet
Michael Newdow is meeting his requirements for child support despite the fact that the mother of his child tried to remove him from his child's life by moving 3,000 miles awayI'd think about moving far away from a guy who is bringing lawsuits for non-existent situations.
Newdow is not only obsessive, he's also out of touch with reality.
Newdow brought the same lawsuit to court in Florida in 1998. The judge threw it out because Newdow's supposedly "harmed" daughter wasn't even school age.
69 posted on
07/16/2002 7:05:34 PM PDT by
syriacus
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson