The Open-Borders Conspiracy

Front Page Magazine ^ | July 15, 2002 | Robert Locke

[Liz]

Thanks for the heads-up. As one insightful FReeper posted: Communism found its most fertile soil in cultures once ruled by iron-fisted high-living royalty. (Cackle) We all know what happened to the likes of King George---Americans told him to "shove it." The founders created a stronghold for free men/women----which shows-up fly-by-night communism for the idiocy that it is.

==============================================================================================

EXCERPT----A major player in the open-borders movement is the govt of Mexico, which openly proclaims (only to its own people, of course) its intention of reconquering the parts of the Southwestern United States that were conquered from them in 1845. It has done a number of things:

1.It financed the notorious Supreme Court case Plyler vs. Doe, which established a "right" for the children of illegal immigrants to attend school. 2. It has a deliberate policy, called acercamiento, (reconciliation or bonding) of attempting to use Mexican-Americans as a voting bloc to advance its political interests, principally in increasing immigration, opening America to Mexican trade, and dealing with Mexico's foreign debt.

.....the Mexican government adopts one, very smooth, tone when speaking to its patsies in America, and another, very militant, tone when speaking to its own people about its ruthlessness in pursuing its own national interest at the expense of American interests.

======================================================

REFERENCE Mexico is pushing north at a furious pace. Mexico's virulent anti-Americanism surfaces in war and peace.

NOTE Mexican drug cartels once again have taken deadly aim against U.S. law enforcement. This time the narco terrorists intentionally rammed their smuggling panga boat against an approaching Coast Guard inflatable which resulted in the death of Chief Petty Officer Terrell Horne III and the injury of another guardsman after they fell into the sea off the southern California coast as reported by the Los Angeles Times. Two suspects have been detained.

The narco insurgents from Mexico increasingly are targeting U.S. officials on both sides of the border: last August two CIA officials were injured in a shooting ambush against their U.S. diplomatic vehicle on a highway south of Mexico City; in Feburary 2011 Los Zetas killed ICE agent Jaime Zapata and wounded his partner who were driving along a highway in the state of San Luis Potosi in a vehicle with U.S. diplomatic tags; in December 2010 the Sinaloa cartel murdered U.S. border patrol agent Brian Terry in southern Arizona; in March 2010 the Juarez cartel whacked U.S. consulate employee Lesley Ann Enriquez and her husband El Paso sheriff's deputy Arthur Redelfs as they were returning home from a child's birthday party in Ciudad Juarez. Meanwhile, President Obama who is charged with securing the border, protecting the people and defending the nation cynically insists that there is no cartel-related spillover violence as he steps over the corpses of federal agents and officials on the blood-soaked ground.

=======================================================

COMMENTS Probably drug kingpins were acting on kill orders from the Mexican govt. Mexico is pushing north at a furious space---salivating for reconquista and lusting for US foreign aid billions. Illegals---"Pressure groups"----are being pushed over the border--- financed and coached by the Third World. Vote-crazed US pols will never criticize drug cartels for killing Americans---Mexico would be offended and that might lose pols those "precious" latino votes (cackle).

===========================================================================

Keep in mind, Mexico is the staging area for global terrorists to slip into the US to attack American targets and undermine US ntl security. We need to blast mail this info far and wide----everytime Ohaha gets on his knees and puckers up to Mexico.

HISTORY TELLS US A LOT----Nazi Germany was the leading importer of Mexican oil in WW 11, taking just over half of their annual production. Mexico was the site of German activity; a supply of high test aviation gas was hidden by German agents in Baja California....a Mexican outpost---- with the knowledge and consent of the Mexican govt.

QUESTION Was Mexico squealing on the US to its German buddies? American oil and gas production in Texas and Louisiana was elevated. Port Isabel, Texas' large oil refinery was a shipping point for fuel headed to the war, and was considered a possible target for German U-boat shelling or even a shore scurry.

[AuntB]

“The guy is right, but too few will listen. I firmly believe the majority of people on this forum don’t even get it. “

Blast from the past! You were right then too, Doughty!

[AuntB]

BTT!!!!

[DoughtyOne]

Thanks AuntB. As a Conservative I didn’t need to know anything more than that these people were breaking our laws, to know illegal immigration was wrong.

It often surprises me how some folks who think they are Conservatives, ignore this one fundamental test.

And yes, I do believe some laws are wrong. It is not wrong to seek to retain our sovereignty.

Caucasians, even male ones, deserve a place on planet earth where they have self-determination. There is a concerted effort to end this.

Folks better wake up and smell the stench before it’s too late.

[DoughtyOne]

Thank you TADSLOS.

[South40]

As a Conservative I didn’t need to know anything more than that these people were breaking our laws, to know illegal immigration was wrong.
It often surprises me how some folks who think they are Conservatives, ignore this one fundamental test.

These days the word "conservative" seems to have as many meanings as does the word "Republican".

[DoughtyOne]

I haven’t studied it enough to map it out, but I believe the core of Conservatism could be as little as five to ten principles. It may be able to be boiled off to as few as three.

Thus, I have a bit of a problem with folks that state you can’t really define what Conservatism is.

This is not intended to make an inference about you, BTW.

When it comes to something as simple as obeying reasoned laws on the books, I think we can safely say that it is Conservative in nature to back law and order.

[DoughtyOne]

I should have addressed this in the prior post, but when it comes to what the Republican party stands for these days, I believe it is a morphing ideology.

As far as I can tell, it wouldn’t be unwilling to surrender on any point if it were considered to be politically expedient.

Reasoned laws on the books are thus not something that determines what the proper law and order action should be.

Instead it seems to believe laws need to be changed if supporting them would cost you votes, even if you could easily retain the votes if only you believed in the core principles of Conservatism, and defended them on point.

[South40]

Five to ten principles easily. To name a few...

Limited government, fiscal responsibility, personal responsibility, traditional family values, American sovereignty and Rule of law.

I posted that on my Facebook page and was roundly criticized by liberals in the family who called me a "right-wing extremist", to which I responded, "I can defend my political ideology with fact and reason. If you could do the same you wouldn't call me an extremist."

Liberalism, as we know, is indefensible. It is also unsustainable. And conservatism makes more sense than the average liberal can comprehend. Thus, the name calling.