Replies

Sure, sure, right, you know the mother so you know everything about what's going on in this case, including details that the media, which has been all over this case, hasn't uncovered. Moreover, you insist on dragging them all over FR.com to lend your arguments the veneer of authority. Whatever.

You're 0 for 2 on the family situation, as neither my wife nor I have been married before nor have either of us had children out of wedlock. We're quite happy. Thanks for your concern all the same.

We do, in fact, have a choice, and it is you have chosen to be bitter. I have more respect for myself than to play amatuer psychiatrist, so I won't speculate why, but I do know that bitterness is why you have dragged me and this argument into two threads and that is why you have stooped to ad hominem arguments, calling me "flyerboy" and "swine". Using the term "feminazi" is indeed harsh but it accurately describes the POV of anyone who thinks fathers are unimportant beyond their financial contributions.

Finally, I would once again like to point out that unlike you, I have not stooped to relying on personal attacks, as you have done in both this thread and the other thread which you dragged me into. Your POV on this issue is both clouded and bankrupt. It is deserving of criticism, in fact, by dragging this argument into another thread, you have invited that criticism. I'm sorry you seem to be unable to separate your opinions from your person. I will not cease to criticize your opinions just because you would rather I not, nor will I cease to defend fatherhood despite your opinions. When you call me into a thread, I will respond. Please consider that before you do it again.

Sure, sure, right, you know the mother so you know everything about what's going on in this case, including details that the media, which has been all over this case, hasn't uncovered.

I would bet HSMama does know more than the average person if she is acquainted with them personally. And you know as well as anyone that the liberal news media is biased more towards the father's view than the mother's. They are bending over backwards to make him palatable to the offended public. The news media hates Christians, period. I wager they are shocked at the uproar since the average American, while perhaps not being a born-again fundamentalist Christian, does believe in God.

This is basically a child custody case gone sour and this guy is using 'religion' as his last-ditch means to get ahold of what he thinks is his property (his daughter). You may be a decent man who doesn't think that way about women and children, but unfortunately not all guys are as nice as you.

**Using the term "feminazi" is indeed harsh but it accurately describes the POV of anyone who thinks fathers are unimportant beyond their financial contributions. Finally, I would once again like to point out that unlike you, I have not stooped to relying on personal attacks,**

An utter and complete lie.