Replies

Sure, sure, right, you know the mother so you know everything about what's going on in this case, including details that the media, which has been all over this case, hasn't uncovered.

I would bet HSMama does know more than the average person if she is acquainted with them personally. And you know as well as anyone that the liberal news media is biased more towards the father's view than the mother's. They are bending over backwards to make him palatable to the offended public. The news media hates Christians, period. I wager they are shocked at the uproar since the average American, while perhaps not being a born-again fundamentalist Christian, does believe in God.

This is basically a child custody case gone sour and this guy is using 'religion' as his last-ditch means to get ahold of what he thinks is his property (his daughter). You may be a decent man who doesn't think that way about women and children, but unfortunately not all guys are as nice as you.

If Mama knows the woman involved then she knows the woman's thoughts and feelings involving her former lover and the father or her child. She certainly does not know Michael Newdow's side of the matter. Moreover, Mama claims knowledge of facts that neither the mother nor the media have revealed. While the liberal media may be more inclined to agree with Michael Newdow's POV on the pledge, the fact remains that scandal is practically the coin of the realm for these people. You don't really believe the liberal media wouldn't sell Michael Newdow out at the first opportunity if it meant more ratings, would you?

This has been a custody case gone sour since the mother of Michael Newdow's child sought to move 3,000 miles away to legally deprive him of visitation with his child. When it comes to being a father, Michael Newdow's actions speak louder than his words. You may think he's a lousy person but you can't deny the fact that he's bent over backwards to be a good father.