Posted on 07/10/2002 3:17:09 PM PDT by FresnoDA
Sweating, hair, prints....there were no carpet fibers from his house found in hers..no evidence of him at all.
How did he get in, when, how did he get her out without running into DVD and the peeing dog?
How did he get her to his house?
Where was she when he came back to the neighborhood on 2/2
When did he supposedly dump her at Deshesa?..the list goes on.
"STill have those pesky unidentified prints in her bedroom and on the doors and the bannister" As they are in many crime scenes. Big deal
Little girl is taken from room, down the stairs and the supposed entry doors that were used, per the VD's...all have unidentified prints..even after the list the parents supplied and LEO were all tested.
Yea, ok Greg
Why has no child or parent stepped forward to say this man was a perv to them or their kids?
His exgirlfriends, 2 of them, both had kids....no abuse.
There are unidentified prints at the scene in many cases. Manson for one. I can think of a couple others as well. That not unusual at all. You must know that.
In other words, the guilty are sometimes set free. Of course. I understand perfectly, even if others do not.
As I recall the OJ trial, much more time was devoted to "educating" the jury as to the soundness of the "science," and its "reliability." On the one hand, one could say: "So what?" That jury didn't care a bit, for science.
But seriously, it seems like the prosecution failed to drive home, the degree of reliability, for hair, fiber, blood and DNA. Likewise, he failed to question the bug guy, as to the range of error for weather as a variable.
The jury is left to decide, what weight to give to one bit of physical evidence, versus another.
Both sides got the bug guy to make a statement, which serves their case; leaving it inconclusive, as I heard it (therefore both sides can quote the statement he made, favoring their position).
As I view the case today, I predict a hung jury. Some jurors will see the physical evidence against DW, and not be able to believe all of the items are just a "coincidence." Maybe it would fall under a calculation of "compound probability" (if that is the correct statistical term).
Those voting to acquit or not guilty, will see the chance, individually, for each item of physical evidence to have occured, and for DW to not have killed the 7 year old girl, used his SUV and MH to transport her, gotten her hair, blood, DNA and fibers all around him.
a 100% NYLON (Waterproof) snowboard cover could be how a body could be contained bug free in a moist environment. This theory could also fit in with the sports interests of the parties involved. Also, if the cover was B/G it could have left B/G Nylon fibers on a body.Also, ever since your post about "Father Daughter weekend at Big Bear", during the weekend of FEB. 1. 2002--
Now whose snowboard cover or duffle bag was used as a mummification shroud for little Danielle's body? Damon's, Libby's, whose?
Was the body kept in the trunk of Damon's SUV, someone else's trunk, or that mountain top cabin? All can provide the dry environments that mummification takes place in.
Oh Damon! Don't leave the country, please.
Yep!
The testimony of the expert regarding the "porno" was quite compelling. The evidence he found was very clear. It WAS Westerfield's son who downloaded most of that porn, and the prosecution, imnho, knew it, before they prejudiced the jury by showing the son's porno in the opening statement. Anything to win, facts and innocence be damned. -- That is unacceptable, corrupt, rotten attitude for any officer of the court.
"Westerfield is Guilty"---Bill O'Reilly
Sanity prevails. Thank you Mr.O'Reilly!!
There are certain circles -- people are in this group of associates and that, Mr. O'Reilly is in one (at least one), and it is NOT so all-knowing as he imagines it to be.
That not what Marcus Lawson said in his testimony...
On cross-examination, prosecutor George "Woody" Clarke tried to undermine the expert's testimony by getting Lawson to admit that he could not say who downloaded the violent rape scenes and nude shots of young girls found on discs in Westerfield's office.
"As far as Neal having created the images on the zip discs and CDs, that would be speculation on your part," said Clarke.
"That's correct," Lawson agreed
Trying to pass speculation off as "fact"....Not very honest on your part bvw. Not very honest at all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.