Replies

So your contention is that in every crime ever commited the perp has left either hair, sweat, prints at the scene? Is that what you are saying?

There are unidentified prints at the scene in many cases. Manson for one. I can think of a couple others as well. That not unusual at all. You must know that.

"So your contention is that in every crime ever commited the perp has left either hair, sweat, prints at the scene? Is that what you are saying?"

I don't know what Rheo is saying, but I do know this much: if you have been somewhere--anywhere--you will have left a little of yourself behind. It will be sweat (we know DW sweats a lot), or skin flakes or hairs. Covering oneself with hats or clothing will not stop that, unless it's a hazmat suit. As clothing moves--slacks on the legs, for instance, or sleeves on the arms--it loosens more tiny hairs that are left behind. DW also has a beard--hairs fall from a beard, as well. I doubt the beard was covered.

It's not just criminals that leave this material behind. It's everyone. And--interesting fact I was reading recently in a book about allergies--apparently we drop this material more profusely when we're stressed. Even animals--cats, dogs, etc.--lose more hair and have more skin flake off when stressed. (I'd say a man who just broke into someone's house and is stealing a little girl would be very stressed, wouldn't you?)

So it's all of us, Greg. Wherever you go, there you are, in all your flaky, sweaty, hairy glory!

Not one print or trace evidence that DW was EVER in the house...not one? Doesn't that bother you?

Greg, if this case were presented to a team of top Detectives, just on a billboard, for example...and the cast of characters was "listed"...where they were, what they drank, what they were doing...You'd have to put DW aside on the totem pole for the possible "perp". The biggest opportunity for someone to grab Dannielle came from SOMEONE who came from within that house.

Damon, not DW, was overly cooperative with the LE. He showed them how the crime could have been done without FORCED entry..remember the magnets?

He and Brenda LIED, and changed their stories.

Damon was not in full control of himself that evening. He was left alone with the children from 8 till 2am, smoking pot and drinking. Yes, Damon was "high". He was visualizing his wife out at the bar, picking up women (and men), he was "hot" in more ways than one.

You do not think it's even thinkable that a father would molest his daughter...when the statistics show that over 75% of the children killed or missing have been murdered by a family member?

So then, we have two tiny specs of MitDNA blood, OK, admit that is troubling. It would really be troubling if DW had NEVER been in contact with Danielle or her Mother. If Danielle had NEVER been in or around his home or Motor Home...THEN it would be troubling.

No, I cannot explain how the drops got on DW's belongings...NOR can anyone explain exactly what took place at that home, between 8pm that evening till the time the sun came up the next morning. It's all just what Damon and Brenda have said..So, they lied and changed their stories, and I want to know WHY?

sw