The testimony of the expert regarding the "porno" was quite compelling. The evidence he found was very clear. It WAS Westerfield's son who downloaded most of that porn, and the prosecution, imnho, knew it, before they prejudiced the jury by showing the son's porno in the opening statement. Anything to win, facts and innocence be damned. -- That is unacceptable, corrupt, rotten attitude for any officer of the court.