The testimony of the expert regarding the "porno" was quite compelling. The evidence he found was very clear. It WAS Westerfield's son who downloaded most of that porn, and the prosecution, imnho, knew it, before they prejudiced the jury by showing the son's porno in the opening statement. Anything to win, facts and innocence be damned. -- That is unacceptable, corrupt, rotten attitude for any officer of the court.
That not what Marcus Lawson said in his testimony...
On cross-examination, prosecutor George "Woody" Clarke tried to undermine the expert's testimony by getting Lawson to admit that he could not say who downloaded the violent rape scenes and nude shots of young girls found on discs in Westerfield's office.
"As far as Neal having created the images on the zip discs and CDs, that would be speculation on your part," said Clarke.
"That's correct," Lawson agreed
Trying to pass speculation off as "fact"....Not very honest on your part bvw. Not very honest at all.