[Greg Weston]

>>The evidence he found was very clear. It WAS Westerfield's son who downloaded most of that porn, and the prosecution, imnho, knew it, before they prejudiced the jury by showing the son's porno in the opening statement. Anything to win, facts and innocence be damned. -- That is unacceptable, corrupt, rotten attitude for any officer of the court.<<

That not what Marcus Lawson said in his testimony...

On cross-examination, prosecutor George "Woody" Clarke tried to undermine the expert's testimony by getting Lawson to admit that he could not say who downloaded the violent rape scenes and nude shots of young girls found on discs in Westerfield's office.

"As far as Neal having created the images on the zip discs and CDs, that would be speculation on your part," said Clarke.

"That's correct," Lawson agreed

Trying to pass speculation off as "fact"....Not very honest on your part bvw. Not very honest at all.

[bvw]

Fact, by expert testimony, unrebutted: It WAS Westerfield's son who downloaded most of that porn.

[bvw]

Greg, here's a show to watch: JOHN STOSSEL-20/20 FRIDAY 7/12/02 10PM - "HOW MEDIA FOOLS PUBLIC

[MizSterious]

Are you saying DW downloaded the porn that was downloaded while he was at the police station being questioned? That's quite a feat, isn't it? Jaded is right--this man possesses magical powers!

[FresnoDA]

Hey everybody...have you seen my latest post??

Come on over...I will "school ya" on what really happened, Feb. 1, 2002