Skip to comments.
US, China 'jammed each other's signals'
The Strait Times (Singapore) ^
| July 9, 2002
Posted on 07/08/2002 7:51:05 PM PDT by HAL9000
HONGKONG - Electronic warfare erupted recently when an unidentified US aircraft carrier, whose communications signals were interrupted by the Chinese military, retaliated by paralysing the 'enemy's' transmissions, reports said yesterday.
Seen as the most severe military clash between the two countries in the past two years, the incident was also the second time that the US had crippled the Chinese military's communication capabilities in recent years.
A report in the Taiwanese news portal ETtoday.com said the incident occurred during a routine military exercise by the US Navy's 7th Fleet off north-west Okinawa in Japan.
A drill involving a jet fighter belonging to the carrier as well as another US EP-3 reconnaissance plane over the East China Sea was interrupted by electronic signals transmitted from a nearby Chinese warship, the report said.
The US fighter plane retaliated by activating its anti-interference mechanism, leading to a brief electronic warfare of sorts between the two armed forces.
Using very narrow frequency widths, the US fighter was said to have succeeded in jamming the electronic warfare equipment on board the Chinese vessel as well as bring communication at the Peoples' Liberation Army naval and army bases in the north of Fujian province to a standstill.
Although media reports did not mention the precise date of the clash, the official website of the 7th Fleet indicated that one of its aircraft carriers - the Kitty Hawk - held its latest routine exercise in early May this year.
There was no mention of the incident on the website.
According to Hongkong's Apple Daily, this is the second time in recent years that a clash of this nature has taken place.
The first took place in July 1995 during a controversial visit to the US by former Taiwanese President Lee Teng-hui.
Displeased about the visit, China flexed its muscles by staging a large-scale military drill at its coastal regions near the Taiwan Strait.
The Clinton administration then sent out four jet fighters to the Chinese coast to suss out Beijing's real intentions, but their aerial communication was interrupted by signals transmitted by Chinese planes alerted to their presence.
The US fighters retaliated by using advanced equipment to counter the signals and succeeded in blocking them.
TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; chinastuff; electronicwarfare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
1
posted on
07/08/2002 7:51:05 PM PDT
by
HAL9000
To: HAL9000
With "friends" like these...
2
posted on
07/08/2002 7:54:39 PM PDT
by
ShayAllen
To: HAL9000
Why would a nation that still to this day hasn't orbited a man around the Earth - think that it could jam the communications of a nation that has been to the Moon... 33 years ago?!
3
posted on
07/08/2002 7:55:52 PM PDT
by
Southack
To: HAL9000
So now we know how to jam their communications and have tested our new communication systems that we built after the 1995 incident.
However, they could have been testing their new communications systems by getting us to jam them.
The wonderful world of black ops.
Nothing to see here, back to making tin foil beanies.
4
posted on
07/08/2002 8:09:32 PM PDT
by
Lokibob
To: Southack
Why would a nation that still to this day hasn't orbited a man around the Earth - think that it could jam the communications of a nation that has been to the Moon... 33 years ago?!Because we've exported all our manufacturing technology to them.
To: Southack
Testing the water...
To: HAL9000
The United States should stop doing trade or giving anything beneficial to these chinese SOB'S.
7
posted on
07/08/2002 8:59:19 PM PDT
by
bok
To: *China stuff
.
To: Willie Green
Why would a nation that still to this day hasn't orbited a man around the Earth - think that it could jam the communications of a nation that has been to the Moon... 33 years ago?!Because we've exported all our manufacturing technology to them.
They may have gotten everything THEY know from us, but it's not everything WE know.
To: maui_hawaii
Testing the water...
So to speak. I'm sure being jammed provides the ChiComs with absolutely no useful information for reverse-engineering or other analyses of our technologies.
10
posted on
07/08/2002 9:27:15 PM PDT
by
andyk
To: andyk
What if they are monitoring the signals and figuring out what kind and how we jam? They are learning how we do things, and how their stuff reacts to it...possible no?
To: Southack
Ego.
To: HAL9000
We shouldn't do this anymore, because they'll learn how we do it and come up with possible countermeasures. It's good to know they can do it though.
13
posted on
07/08/2002 9:36:09 PM PDT
by
Kermit
To: Willie Green
"Because we've exported all our manufacturing technology to them." You've clearly never flown in a Chinese "fighter" jet if you think that...
14
posted on
07/08/2002 9:37:45 PM PDT
by
Southack
To: HAL9000
Has Clinton commented yet about the hate crime our military committed against his buddies in China yet?
To: HAL9000
China is testing our capabilities with these electronic challenges.
To: HAL9000
Every time they do that, the iron filings on our machine shop floor, are attracted to the computer network cables.
I do wish they'd stop doing that!
To: RemainCALM
They may have gotten everything THEY know from us, but it's not everything WE know.We're saving the Area 51 stuff for when we really need it. :^)
18
posted on
07/08/2002 11:14:34 PM PDT
by
#3Fan
To: HAL9000
..and so the Clinton legacy continues...
19
posted on
07/08/2002 11:48:37 PM PDT
by
lawdog
To: maui_hawaii
What if they are monitoring the signals and figuring out what kind and how we jam? They are learning how we do things, and how their stuff reacts to it...possible no?And we might not jam the same things in wartime, huh?
Uncertainty is the only certainty you get in the field of electronic warfare.
20
posted on
07/09/2002 1:59:08 PM PDT
by
Poohbah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson