Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. quietly OKs fetal stem cell work - Bush allows funding despite federal limits on embryo use
Chicago Tribune ^ | July 7, 2002 | By Jeremy Manier

Posted on 07/07/2002 11:24:26 AM PDT by Keyes For President

Edited on 09/03/2002 4:50:44 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

The Bush administration has approved the first federally funded project using stem cells obtained from fetuses aborted up to eight weeks after conception, expanding the scientific promise of stem cell research and complicating the ethics debate that surrounds it.


(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; embryo; fetus; stemcell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 441-451 next last
To: carenot
But isn't GW's wife and mother for the choice to choose?

Laura would like to see abortions "reduced", of course, but managed to make her decision on ESCR in advance of her husband: Laura Bush Makes Up Mind on Stem Cells (smirk =)

I still think Barbara's by far the more interesting -- and honest -- read: Abortions in the First Trimester Only

381 posted on 07/08/2002 10:40:16 AM PDT by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: Scholastic
Ah, but WHOSE spin machine?
382 posted on 07/08/2002 10:47:13 AM PDT by dcwusmc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 378 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou; Howlin
Aren't you fortunate to get a time out for a week. LOL. Heck I remember once a few of us got a six month time out and it lasted a few days maybe a couple weeks or more for some. The girl can't help it.
383 posted on 07/08/2002 11:27:35 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 379 | View Replies]

To: deport
Bad case of Caint-Heppits, huh?
384 posted on 07/08/2002 11:39:46 AM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies]

To: deport
Oh, gee, I read a post by the person in question just the other day. She said that she was back early by popular demand! :-D
385 posted on 07/08/2002 1:28:42 PM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
I think that Bush said that he wanted to really think this one through before making a decision.
386 posted on 07/08/2002 1:44:26 PM PDT by aquawrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Gosh, you must be excited. When you posted this same article on LP it only got 5 comments.

Yeah, and nobody at Liberty Post called me names for posting an article either. Nice folks.

387 posted on 07/08/2002 2:33:08 PM PDT by Keyes For President
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
Don't reckon they'd lie to her now would they? LOL
388 posted on 07/08/2002 2:42:28 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 385 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
I see, though, that my statement "that's funding he can't block" was correct.

I don't think so. "Blocking funding of fetal stem cell research" and "prohibiting support of research on the transplantation of human fetal tissue for therapeutic purposes" aren't the same thing. There's plenty wiggle room there, and hopefully the Administration will take advantage of it.

389 posted on 07/08/2002 4:57:58 PM PDT by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies]

To: Keyes For President
Nobody's calling names on that thread; they're too busy on trashing all us over here on the the "Welcome Thread," aka as "Why I Hate Free Republic but still post there" thread.
390 posted on 07/08/2002 5:01:23 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 387 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Psst! You'd better watch it Howlin, or I'm going to use my pull with AOL to have you permanently banned from the internet. BTW, got any pictures of the President???? Oops! Gotta run and pick up my kids from soccer.
391 posted on 07/08/2002 5:08:18 PM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies]

To: rintense
ROTFLMAO....
392 posted on 07/08/2002 5:33:33 PM PDT by Neets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 391 | View Replies]

To: Sandy
Do you know how to find the text of this law that blocks GWB from doing the right thing?

I very much want to see it.

Then maybe we can do something about it.

Cheers,

Richard F.

393 posted on 07/08/2002 5:46:20 PM PDT by rdf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 389 | View Replies]

To: rdf
I believe it was posted at #275.
394 posted on 07/08/2002 6:06:41 PM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 393 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
Could you try to state the meaning of this legislation in English?

And what do you think would happen if GWB, or his subordinates, said that, so far as he, or they, could make it out, there was no license to exploit human remains for 'research' on the basis of this language?

I stand ready to carry a spear, or an AK 47, or whatever else is needed in the political world, to help the President on this matter. And to undermine his wife and her mother-in-law.

Do you?

Cheers,

Richard F.

395 posted on 07/08/2002 6:17:54 PM PDT by rdf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies]

To: rdf
Here it is.

More specifically, the 1993 stuff that the article mentions is in Sec. 289g-1, Research on transplantation of fetal tissue and Sec. 289g-2, Prohibitions regarding human fetal tissue.

The section of the 1993 law that supposedly makes it illegal to ban (any?)funding of fetal stem cell research is called "Nullification of Moratorium," which is in the U.S.Code under Notes on Sec. 289g-1 and includes a link to the actual Public Law that was passed.

396 posted on 07/08/2002 6:26:27 PM PDT by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 393 | View Replies]

To: rdf
Note, the important thing that needs defining is "research on the transplantation of human fetal tissue for therapeutic purposes". This is something that could maybe be clarified in new NIH guidelines, imo. (BTW, "human fetal tissue" is already defined in the law as "tissue or cells obtained from a dead human embryo or fetus after a spontaneous or induced abortion, or after a stillbirth.")
397 posted on 07/08/2002 6:37:55 PM PDT by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 395 | View Replies]

To: rdf
Could you try to state the meaning of this legislation in English?

Hey, you're the social studies professor. I'm just a lowly science teacher; I was hoping you would explain it to me!

Sure, I'm ready to stop it...what can we do besides calling our congresscritters?

398 posted on 07/08/2002 7:12:58 PM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 395 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
Thanks.. I knew Bush didn't sign any legislation other than what he proposed...
399 posted on 07/08/2002 7:41:40 PM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou; Howlin; Askel5
"Do you think she's learned about plagiarism and acknowledging authors? Oh-- maybe they don't teach that until senior year."

I did not plagiarize anything; it's called critical thinking and writing, which I got an 'A' in.

400 posted on 07/08/2002 8:00:08 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 379 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 441-451 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson