Skip to comments.
Pataki says no buildings will be constructed on footprints of twin towers
News Radio 88 ^
| 6/30/03
Posted on 06/30/2002 5:51:35 AM PDT by areafiftyone
(New York-AP) -- Governor George Pataki says the site where the World Trade Center towers once stood would be preserved as a memorial to those who died there.
He called ground zero ``hallowed ground'' yesterday, telling a gathering of relatives of victims of the terrorist attacks that, ``We will never build where the towers stood.''
Several hundred family members who attended a memorial ceremony at the Javits Center in Manhattan gave the governor a standing ovation after his remarks.
Pataki did not make a statement about how large a memorial should be. Some family members have said they do not want any commercial development on the 16-acre site.
The Coalition of 9/11 Families distributed questionnaires at yesterday's event, asking relatives their views on how much of the site should be preserved.
Former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani also spoke at the ceremony. He said his vision is of ``a soaring, dramatic, beautiful memorial that draws people there 100 years, 150 years, from now.''
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
To: areafiftyone
Who owns the property?
To: areafiftyone
Governor George Pataki says the site where the World Trade Center towers once stood would be preserved as a memorial to those who died there. Who owns the property? I thought the Port Authority had sold it to a private party just months prior to the attack.
To: areafiftyone
And there will never be night games at Wrigley Field.
To: Protect the Bill of Rights; areafiftyone
To: areafiftyone
Rebuild the towers. Nothing would lift this city's morale more than seeing them back where they belong. Plus we need the financial activity there again. Pataki is a fool.
6
posted on
06/30/2002 6:21:21 AM PDT
by
speedy
To: speedy
They not only should rebuild, they should be even taller than before (but, please, let's do something about that boxy design, a nice elaborate classical/postmodern look would be better). I say make 'em 2,000 feet high !
To: fieldmarshaldj
As long as it is something spectacular and huge, if only so I know which way is south when I clamber up out of a subway. There were wonderful restaurants and a lounge, "Greatest Bar On Earth", at the top of one of the towers, where I always took visitors. Still sometimes seems hard to believe it isn't there.
8
posted on
06/30/2002 6:36:08 AM PDT
by
speedy
To: fieldmarshaldj
please, let's do something about that boxy design, a nice elaborate classical/postmodern look would be better I agree! I never much cared for the design of the Towers. They looked like two match boxes standing on end. A building in the style of the Empire State Building would be nice.
9
posted on
06/30/2002 7:06:19 AM PDT
by
PaulJ
To: PaulJ
The Singer Building once stood a block away from the WTC, and I thought it was a gorgeous building (and probably one of the greatest architectural atrocities in NY was when they allowed it to be demolished in the mid '60s), and I'm hoping they would use a design of a similar style...
To: fieldmarshaldj
Another image before its demolition, directly overlooking the future WTC site.
To: areafiftyone
They wanted to knock a permanent dead spot into the middle of New York and it looks like they have succeeded.
The best memorial would be to rebuild and have an area where New York LIFE continues in spite of the madness of a few.
12
posted on
06/30/2002 7:44:25 AM PDT
by
Arkinsaw
To: areafiftyone
How disgusting........this pandering for votes. Sounding like Rudy...........
Will the 'victim's families' give their millions to the owners of the buildings for taking their land?
To: fieldmarshaldj
I never saw the Singer building; its beautiful, too bad they tore it down (just like Penn Station). A saving grace is that there is a Singer building still on Nevsky Prospect (the main drag) in St. Petersburg, Russia. Its equally interesting.
14
posted on
06/30/2002 8:04:23 AM PDT
by
laconic
To: PaulJ
Bring back Radio Row!
15
posted on
06/30/2002 8:30:55 AM PDT
by
Don Joe
To: Protect the Bill of Rights
Who owns the property?
That's the only question that should matter. And if its the taxpayers of New York, they shouldn't have to forgo the incredible income in order to produce some man-made memorial. There is a dignified way of doing this without wasting billions of dollars in lost income that would come from using this site commercially.
To: fieldmarshaldj
I say make 'em 2,000 feet high !
Make a single building, tilt it to the left and use it to house Clinton's office.
To: areafiftyone
Pataki is a fool to say this.
18
posted on
06/30/2002 8:38:16 AM PDT
by
Hildy
To: areafiftyone
Put them back up! This would show the world that we cannot be beaten, that we will always come back.
And it would give the terrorists the finger too.
19
posted on
06/30/2002 8:39:24 AM PDT
by
LibKill
To: VA Advogado
I believe that the property is owned by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey.
However, I believe that they contracted a private agency to administer the World Trade Center complex... but I'm not entirely sure about that.
20
posted on
06/30/2002 8:40:10 AM PDT
by
clikker
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-62 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson