Jim Quinn interview David Shippers and Janya Davis concerning OKC terrorist connection(6/27/02).

WRRK - The War Room archives ^ | 06/27/2002 | Quinn and Rose on WRRK

[McGruff]

Yesterday (6/27/2002)Jim Quinn had an interview with David Shippers and Janya Davis concerning John Doe #2 OKC Middle eastern terrorist cover-up.

It's now available in his archives. Go to the link above and click on show archives and 6/27/2002. It’s available in multiple formats. Segment starts 1 hour and 30 mins into the broadcast.

It's definitely worth listening.

[Nita Nupress]

Assuming it's "a massive coverup," what do you propose we do about it?

Not what we would all want to do, but what would get the maximum results as far as justice being served.

[Betty Jo]

Well, Nita, I havnt "spoken" to you since you told me not to, so I am surprized by your attention!

I am happy that you have asked my opinion!

What should we do about justice being served on this?

Hmmmm,.....cant bring back the dead at Murrah....cant bring back the dead from WTC......hmmmmm.

What does the "legal system" do about obstructing justice,RICO....murder...treas on....mis-mal and nonfeasance....Hmmmmm.....


I know!

How about putting them all on trial?


How about taking them all out of the picture?

How about stopping them all and their phoney "War on Terrorism"?

How about the truth?

[Nita Nupress]

That's a laundry list of what you wish would happen. I'm asking for what you think could feasibly happen.

If you don't think there is a difference, don't bother answering.

(Does that mean I'm asking you not to speak to me again? I don't remember doing that the first time, but whatever you say. I do vaguely remember getting irritated at your constant Bush-bashing that makes a lot of people ignore your excellent research, but did I really ask you to not speak to me again? BTW, I'm off to bed. Will check this thread in the morning.)

[ladyinred]

Please accept my sympathy for the loss of your parent. I cannot imagine the frustration you must feel with all of the lies and coverups that are obvious in this case. My hope and prayer is that someday the entire story will be told. We all deserve the truth, but you and other family members do most of all.

[Betty Jo]

You asked for maximum results.

Thats what I listed, off the top of my head.

Given more time, I could probably think of more exciting things, like all of them living in Saudi, wearing a burka(imagine georgie in such!)

Since I am not a rabid partisan republican, just a semi-rabid conservative,I find all murderers, theives, traitors and other lowlife in the same boat.

Sink it!

[OKCSubmariner]

Please see replies #85 and #106. Thanks.

[OKCSubmariner]

Please see replies #85 and #106. Thanks

[Nita Nupress]

I just have one question before leaving this thread. Why are you doing this?  What purpose will it serve?  Sure, it'll make you f-e-e-l better, but beyond that?  Let's be honest:  At the end of the day, after you get all this personal anger and angst out of your system, what purpose does it serve to publicly slander people whom you know will not (and should not) crawl into the ditch with you?  

And perhaps more importantly, why would I get in a pissing match to defend people I've never personally met?    My only answer to that is this:  If the shoe were on the other foot, I would be defending  you.  You're just too busy whining to stop and figure it out.

I'm not defending anyone personally; I'm defending anyone who appears to be a victim of someone else's vindictiveness and personal animosity. To put it bluntly, appearing on a public forum and repeating personal conversations and interactions is downright rude, tacky and crass.  It serves no useful purpose whatsoever other than to make you, Pat Briley, f-e-e-l better. 

If that were not true, you wouldn't keep repeating yourself.

Why don't you just take out a personal billboard on I-95?

Get it a-l-l  out of your system.

[Nita Nupress]

You asked for maximum results. Thats what I listed, off the top of my head. Given more time, I could probably think of more exciting things, like all of them living in Saudi, wearing a burka(imagine georgie in such!)

My bad. What I'm trying to get at is a sense of realism. Not what we all WISH and WANT to happen, but what we can realistically expect. People who live here and talk about it all the time expect anyone and EVERYone who has participated in a coverup to rot in jail.

All I'm saying is that's not a realistic expectation, that's all.

[Twodees]

Thanks for the ping. I remember reading this transcript after the show aired ( I don't watch OhReally very often) but had forgotten about the lines you highlighted. It does illustrate that Davis was attempting to get that out and OhReally didn't want to hear it. He's a self impressed doodlebug, IMO.

Anyway, you're right; there's always more than one side to a story.

[Triple]

"Why are you doing this? What purpose will it serve? "

Me butting in...

Do you think he is setting the record straight, or distorting the truth of the matter?

Regards,

[Nancie Drew]

Not only distorting the truth, but making up things. Jayna has absolutely never worked for anyone in the government. That is absolutely ludicrous and Jayna never told him that. It is very scary to me that he is just making things up.

[Triple]

"Jayna has absolutely never worked for anyone in the government. That is absolutely ludicrous and Jayna never told him that."

How do you kow that with such certainty; are you Jayna?

Regards,

[Nita Nupress]

Let's put it this way: If I were Jayna Davis, my lawyer would already be on the phone to JimRob.

[Nancie Drew]

OKCSubmariner knows very well who I am, and I am not Jayna. See his reply #106 and I am mentioned. Jayna will not use this forum to answer malicious lies and slander. Nita has a very good suggestion in post #115. I am a personal friend of Jayna’s. Believe me, I know very well that Pat is absolutely lying.

[Triple]

Thanks for the reply.

IMO, Pat has some things wrong, and some things right with more right than wrong.

Did Jayna have a memo warning of the attack, that was not handed over to the TM defense or made public until recetly? (I think Pat is saying she did.)

Regards,

[lawdog]

BBTTT !

[carenot]

My opinion is that Davis has misled her friends and the public badly about the real story here. Her friends are having difficulty attempting to defend the indefensible.

After reading EVERY thread I can and have found, all the links to anything and everything, including Michael Rivero, I have to agree with you.

Thanks.