Posted on 06/26/2002 11:25:21 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
UNBELIEVABLE. BREAKING ON FOX: SF APPEALS COURT SAYS PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ENDORSES RELIGION, AND IS THEREBY UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
You're actually being forced into religion? Give me a large break.
The First Amendment is finally becoming the law of the land?
You will not use any venue you please to spout your religiosity because the First Amendment says that you will not...
I cannot find any references to helix", "venue", "spouting", "religiosity", or any reference to a prohibition directed at any individual in the first Amendment.
and the 9th circuit court has interpreted this Amendment for those who have difficulty understanding it.
Oh, never mind.
sigh. Cordially,
But, I will add that the people who think there is something important or special about having God in it (which was put there by my own relatives i.e. Eisenhower) are completely looped. Talk about overstating the inconsequential.
By saying "one nation, under God", the pledge is asserting that there is a "god" and that our nation is under it. I don't see much difference between a pledge to "God" or a pledge to "one nation, under God."
"You cannot penalize 95% of Americans because one father and two judges are mind-numbed idiots... "
This is not supposed to be a majority-rule nation. If 95% of the people wanted all firearms confiscated, should the gov't do so? No, because we have a Second Amendment right. Again, it would be just as wrong for a public schoolteacher to tell students that there is no god, or that religion is bad, and so on. Unfortunately, with school and state mixed together, we will continue to encounter these problems.
But the children are in the classroom without their parents. They're going to do what the teacher says, and they're going to go along with their peers. Also, the phrase "under God" wasn't in the original pledge. There's no reason why it should've been added.
If the pledge is a TOTAL affront to them, let them remove their kids from the public schools just as the religious Right families do due to the influx of non-Christian and anti-Christian ideas.
My children do not attend public school, either. Unfortunately, we're still required to pay for everyone else's public school education through our property taxes.
Thanks for your other comments. The one about "mandating a pledge to freedom" was a good one. It does seem quite ironic.
I think you gave yourself away Limey, Americans don't use the word "bloody". Go back to "bloody" Britain and stay there!!
Instead of proving that you are a waste of flesh, why don't you demonstrate that your IQ exceeds that of a cabbage. I was born in the U.S. and my ancestors have been in this country since the late 1600's and are documented to have fought in the revolution against the British -- how about yours? Furthermore, I have personally served in the infantry as an American soldier and bear the physical scars of that service, which I proudly wear. Incidentally, I am not a Limey, I'm mostly ethnically Scottish and proud of it (surprisingly pure considering that we've been in the U.S. for the better part of 300 years).
It is ignorant cockroaches like you that make this country a dung heap. Piss off. I'm twice the American you could ever hope to be.
With due respect, the Establishment Clause does not mention "religious speech". It does refer to an "establishment of religion", which I believe at that time referred primarily to an ecclesiastical establishment of a national Christian denomination, as evidenced by Madison's first draft of the Amendment, and by Blackstone's interchangeable use of the terms "national church," "our present establishment," and "the national religion".
THOMAS JEFFERSON, JEFFERSON'S WRITINGS (1905).
Thomas Jefferson, Second Inaugural Address (1805)
"The germ of dissolution of our federal government is in . . . the federal judiciary; an irresponsible body (for impeachment is merely a scare-crow) working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief, over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall be usurped from the States." Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Mr. Hammond, 1821.
Cordially,
When a class is reciting the Pledge you can insert whatever diety you want, and that my friend is freedom of speech and freedom of worship. If you have no God then do what a kid in my class did and stay politely seated.
If you don't worship any Gods, then stay politely seated, like a kid in my class did.
If you are worried about the name of God being too sacred, have no fear "God" is not His name YHWH is known as the Tetragrammation, and YHWH is the four consonants that stand for the original name which, even thousands of years ago, had been forgotten.
Did this mean that they had renounced Christianity? No. Just its role in governmentMaybe not, but a Christian did:Even this is a gross overstatement. The emphasis was in not allowing a church to enforce sectarian edicts. Even those who were Deists would not and did not take the stand that Christianity had no place in government.
Who does not see that the same authority which can establish Christianity in exclusion of all other religions may establish, with the same ease, any particular sect of Christians in exclusion of all other sects? That the same authority which can force a citizen to contribute threepence only of his property for the support of any one establishment may force him to conform to any other establishment in all cases whatsoever?
-James Madison, "A Memorial and Remonstrance," addressed to the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Virginia, 1785
-Eric
John Adams could sign a treaty affirming that the United States Government was in no way founded upon the Christian religion, while remaining a devout Christian himself.From the treaty itself:This is out of context. The treaty with the Sultans and Beys had to do with an inherent animosity with Islam that was part of the relationship between the Islamic powers and many of the European powers, and that both of these sides regarded as an underpinning of their nationhood.
As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian Religion--as it has itself no character of enmity against the law, religion or tranquility of Musselmen [Muslims]
How can "context" make that statement into anything other than what it is?
-Eric
I don't understand why everyone is so upset with all of this now. People have been giving lip service to the PoA for years. It says distinctly that our allegiance is to "the flag of the United States of America" and "to the Republic for which it stands" (represents).
How can everyone get so upset now? Over half of America, and an amazing portion of FReepers, don't even know our proper form of government and now 90% of America is upset because "under G_d" is stricken from the PoA? I doubt if such a fuss would be raised if it were to be changed to "and to the Democracy for which it stands".
Funny, nobody got upset that it wasn't in the original and wasn't added for over 60 years! Most people in America at that time believed that the whole world, not just America, was "under G_d" whether they wanted it to be or not. As a Christian I still believe the whole world is "under G_d". Whether someone else believes it or not doesn't matter to me one iota!
I guess there really is no allegiance to the Republic after all, whether one is a Christian, a Diest, a Muslim or an athiest, which is what the real issue should be about.
Even Bellamy didn't dare mess that up and he was a Socialist! He couldn't fool the people of that day. They understood that America wasn't a democracy. It's so much easier to do so today with dumb-downed America.
That, to me anyway, is what the real goal is, to draw attention away from "the Republic" and isn't it working great...no further discussion on the rest of the PoA is needed, we'll just concentrate on "under G_d". America has got to "export Democracy" ya know! G-D knows we don't have too many goods and products to export!
Yet, in spite of its Socialist origins, its use in a blatant marketing campaign and its association with the NEA, I personally like the PoA and I like "under G_d" in the PoA. Moreso because it irks so many that it's in there than any other reason. However, I like "and to the Republic for which it stands" the best.
Oh, why bother. "Nothing up my sleeve" said the magician as he began his trick.
When they tell me that I can't sing "G_d Bless America" I'll really start to worry.
I can agree with this concept though...Perhaps the time has come to see that this allegiance should be to the U.S. constitution and not to a piece of cloth. John W. Baer
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.