I thought she was pretty hot when she used to play with Ozzy.
Thought she was dead, though.
Posted on 06/26/2002 11:25:21 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
Ugh - good question. Not sure if the remand can be appealed. I think it would depend on the particular rules for the 9th Circuit and would mostly certainly depend on the court history of this case (claims by Plaintiff that have survived, District Court opinion, etc).
My wife uses NT at work, and they have it locked down in that way. She can't even change her desktop background color!
Originally the word liberal meant social conservatives who advocated growth and progress---mostly technological(knowledge being absolute/unchanging)based on law--reality...the nature of man/govt. does not change. These were the Classical liberals...founding fathers-PRINCIPLES---stable/SANE scientific reality/society---industrial progress...moral/social character-values GROWTH!
Then came the post-modern age of switch-flip-spin-DEFORMITY-cancer...Atheist secular materialists through evolution CHANGED-REMOVED the foundations(separation of state/religion)--TRUTH-GOD...made these absolutes relative and calling all the residuals---technology/science === evolution to substantiate/justify their efforts--claims...social engineering--PC--atheism...anti-God/Truth RELIGION--crusade!
Liberals/Evolution BELIEVE they are the conservatives--guardians too...
the shield between state and religion(evolution/atheism) is gone---this is chernobyl---radiation poisoning!!
Hypnotism--witchcraft ideology--politics--religion--BRAINWASHING--superstition--BIAS---EVOLUTION
ps...evolutionism is the essence of liberalism/socialism!
I thought she was pretty hot when she used to play with Ozzy.
Thought she was dead, though.
You're missing the point. Public Education is a State matter, not a Federal one.
That's why many conservatives appropriately oppose the Department of Education.
Do you have something against patriotism and nationalism? Or perhaps you'd prefer we pledge allegiance to some NAFTA flag? Of course, this as soon as the "masses" are taught by the wise men in government it's the right thing to do.
Of course, it is perfectly OK for the nonreligious to impose their religious beliefs upon those of others, yes?
Considering this is not a prayer; considering this is a pledge to the flag and the republic of which the flag represents; considering that the complainent was given the opportunity to have his child opt out of the pledge - which he declined to do; given that he lost this same case in a different court in Florida, hence his move to California, specifically to bring this suit; given all these factors, I would insist that provisions have been previously made for the beliefs of those outside the religious among our society.
I would further insist that this father and by extension, the 9th Circuit, has imposed their religion upon everyone else. Not only that, he (the father) has imposed his lack of patriotism upon everyone else. Makes him just as much a terrorist as the Saudi Arabian Koran-thumpers...
If there is a God(and, I believe there is), and He has been on our side since we became 'One Nation Under God', I can't think of a single issue more pressing to our country's continued existence.
Of course, for those who believe there is no God, it's all just a matter of finding out which person/persons/government they will become slaves to.
Be reasonable, Howlin...Then he'd just be damned.
Very well said. Right on!!
We may not be at the point of "To the barricades!" but we damn sure better start building the damn barricades.
Touché...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.