Posted on 06/26/2002 4:31:38 AM PDT by FormerLurker
Mercurial Times
...they are a-changin'
Hard-hitting, no-holds-barred commentary from dedicated patriots seeking the truth...that's all.
Don't Fatwa Me
by Anna Zetchus Raetz
Oh, the hullabaloo raised by arming a Jew. Welcome to the 21st Century -- the first decade of it well on its way to garnering the title of The Age Of Hysteria.
And meet the Rabbi Yakove Lloyd, founder and president of the Jewish Defense Group (JDG). A religious Jew. A concerned Jew. A Jew that hasn't forgotten.
And what was that now that needed to be remembered? Oh, yeah, just the minor detail that for every Jew there usually are, on average, ten Jew-haters bent on his or her elimination. We could call it "persecution with genocidal intent". It's not a nice sentiment.
Personally, as a Christian, I'm beginning to "get it". A training video recovered from an Afghani Al Qaeda base shows heavily armed terrorists practicing the fine art of entering homes and shooting the inhabitants, in this case mannequins, mannequins with crosses painted on their chests. (But the real dummies are those who don't take these kinds of visuals seriously.)
What needs to be taken seriously is that there are those who believe that to not submit to Allah and recognize his prophet Mohammed makes one an infidel. That's the lighter side. Defending that disbelief, whether in print or in practice, could make you the lucky recipient of your own personalized fatwa, an Islamic religious edict that trades cash for your coco -- ask Salman Rushdie ('cause you can't ask Daniel Pearl).
At the beginning of this month, Iraqi-based fugitive and probable co-conspirator of the 1993 WTC bombing Abdul Rahman Yasin discussed on CBS' "60 Minutes" how, amid the plethora of large significant structural targets in America, Islamikazes also had Jewish neighborhoods in their sights, and still do. The writers at Reuters called that a "perceived threat". And just last week the Feds said that terrorists may be planning on striking local Jewish synagogues and schools with fuel tankers. That's a lot closer than Tora Bora. Now, I don't know what color-code the government has decided to give this particular threat, but methinks the Rabbi is starting to see red. Is it crazy that a Jew living by one of these neighborhoods might consider locking and loading just on the off-chance that these statements are more than just bellicose rhetoric?
And people should "get it". But then it wouldn't be The Age Of Hysteria, it might then resemble a more Biblical Age, a time when Jews were warriors, and winners.
But the only things that Rabbi Lloyd has won by coming to the conclusion that American Jews should be feistier than the average sitting duck are a lot of labels and verbal lashings, and very little praise.
For instance, as far as the Associated Press is concerned, neither he nor the JDG can be mentioned without the prefacing qualifier "right-wing". This kills me, as I've been newspeaked to believe that "right-wing" is synonymous with, among other horrid inferences, "anti-Semite". They're messing with my conditioning. Perhaps it's time for an infusion of fresh talent in AP's Den of Derogatory Disclaimers, 'cause the "right-wing" catch-all has done run its course.
One of my favorite responses to the Rabbi's idea of armed neighborhood patrols has been, by New York's Mayor Bloomberg and others, to call him and his troops "vigilantes". After having so tortured the original intent of the Bill of Rights' Second Amendment by successfully muddying the clarity of "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed" so as to now have it hinge on the predicate phrase "a well-regulated militia", these bozos don't even recognize a militia when somebody forms one.
It's because they don't want to recognize it, unless it's to narrow down even that meaning even further. In fact, the Rabbi was told by some elected officials that the "militia" solely refers to a group of people who seek to overthrow the government. Hey, don't give the Rabbi any ideas, because his interest in self-defense has so far resulted in a lot of public so-called "servants" rudely ordering around their salary-paying masters.
Commissioner Ray Kelly of the NYPD stated that "(t)he department will not tolerate anyone brandishing weapons under the guise of protecting others." Uh, you mean like your publicized yet rarely heeded job slogan, Commissioner? Because, if one is honest, too little is ever done in the name of protection. Perhaps the police department's motto should be "to serve and fill out paperwork and hose down the bloodstains after having carefully outlined the corpse with yellow tape".
Rabbi Lloyd's response to Kelly was "(w)hat the police commissioner does not understand is that no matter what he says ... those who have the legal right to carry firearms can carry firearms." But now it seems that not only is the NYPD set to seek out and arrest those who are patrolling with a weapon without the privilege to do so bestowed on them by the benevolent state, but that the patrollers with the privileges will be arrested for "unlawful assembly". If the yellow tape doesn't catch up to you, the red tape certainly will.
However, the (drumroll, please) certifiable winner of the Ridiculous Reaction To The Revolutionary Rabbi Award is presented to Brooklyn City Councilman Bill DiBlasio, who said about the Rabbi, “He's not wanted here and he's not welcomed here. His brand of terrorism we don't accept.” Good grief, Councilman, what brand of terrorism is it that you do find acceptable? And who, exactly, considers an armed Jew a terror? Councilman DiBlasio should consider the company that statement inadvertently causes him to keep -- such notables as Adolf Hitler, Arafat, and, lately, Ted Turner.
This is the same mentality that a lot of DiBlasio's peers in our Capitol share when discussing the issue of arming our commercial pilots. Instead of the possibility of shooting dead an attempting hijacker, they prefer a policy of shooting down an entire plane.
I had the privilege of interviewing Rabbi Lloyd last week, and he's more than aware of the fact that his own people here in America have contributed significantly to the lunacy and fear that arise whenever the topic of guns does. Most national Jewish groups have rarely met a gun control bill or gun-grabber that they didn't like -- lots of brainwashing, very little Warsaw Ghetto. Not one major Jewish group has spoken out in the Rabbi's defense.
The Rabbi quotes Talmudic Law: "He who comes to slay you, slay him first", which is not unlike our own President's commitment to taking out hostile, threatening regimes before they become successfully-made-good-on-the-threats, murderous regimes. If yellow tape is an unacceptable outline for our nation, why should it become acceptable in our Jewish neighborhoods?
We live in a Republic where its founders were respectful enough of their citizens to guarantee the maintenance of their pre-existent right to self-defense. They didn't envision a nation of sitting ducks. Anyone who doesn't "get this" is a quack. Rabbi Lloyd says, "Every Jew, a .22". Amen, Rabbi, and for every Gentile, too.
June 24, 2002
Anna Zetchus Raetz is a wife, mother, filmmaker (Tailing the Millennium), writer, and national spokeswoman for Liberty Belles. Her Internet radio program, Unspun, can be heard on The Other Radio Network.
Mercurial Times exclusive commentary. Reprints must credit the author and Mercurial Times.
Copyright 2002 - Mercurial Press
"Turn on the light..."
Freedom Is Worth Fighting For !!
Molon Labe !!
And this little tome by H.L. Mencken hits the nail on the head, even though it was written 77 years ago. It just goes to prove but once again that truth is never out of date!
Any of a large number of anti Jewish groups with murder and mayhem in their hearts. Nothing worse than to have your "victim" be armed, creating the distinct possibility that it will be you that gets to meet his maker, rather than him. Can't have that.
Why would we need a committee when it's the "right of the individual" ?
"We live in a Republic where its founders were respectful enough of their citizens to guarantee the maintenance of their pre-existent right to self-defense."
Anna, you are sooo right, thanks for, once again, another magnum!!!
That is a major fact.
Well, I do like that!
But not when they're in the neighborhood.
Here's a happy thought from Middle East expert Daniel Pipes:
Islamists constitute a small but significant minority of Muslims, perhaps 10 to 15 per cent of the population. Many of them are peaceable in apearance, but they all must be considered potential killers.
How does 400,000 to 800,000 -- in our country -- potential killers sound?
America's Fifth Column ... watch PBS documentary JIHAD! In America
Download 8 Mb zip file here (60 minute video)
Though when I told my wife, she immediately pointed out that, while kamikazes were of course our enemies and in the wrong, they at least were honorable warriors, sacrificing themselves in battle with their opponents. They didn't target schools, business offices, hospitals, buses.
Dan
Though when I told my wife, she immediately pointed out that, while kamikazes were of course our enemies and in the wrong, they at least were honorable warriors, sacrificing themselves in battle with their opponents. They didn't target schools, business offices, hospitals, buses.
I had the same conversation with a (CNN-junkie) friend the other day.
"They have no other weapons but their bodies!" she (like a good little indoctrobot) wailed.
"And no other targets than schoolchildren and shoppers?" I asked.
To put it bluntly, there is absolutely no room in the twenty-first century for "la Cosa Islam", nor its radical adherents. To the likes of Ismail Hooper and his kind I say, watch what you say, for I will be, and the RICO act can surely put you, and the "Mohammed" crime family outta bidness for good...
the infowarrior
the infowarrior
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.