Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Junk science about obesity
Washington Times ^ | Thursday, June 20, 2002 | Paul Campos

Posted on 06/19/2002 11:21:13 PM PDT by JohnHuang2

Edited on 07/12/2004 3:54:50 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-159 next last
To: LoneGreenEyeshade
Are you nuts? one of the great problems in this society in my view, is the excessive longevity rates. If we got rid of any type of healthy lifestyle, ate plenty of pork and other greasy foods, as well as distributed cholesterol enhancing pilss. We as a society could save a fortune in social security and medical costs.

Without a doubdt early mortality is cheaper for society in the long run.

41 posted on 06/20/2002 8:32:49 PM PDT by Cacique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
obesity in the United States has increased from 46% of the adult population in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES II, 1976 to 1980) to 54.9% of the adult population in NHANES III (1988 to 1994).
42 posted on 06/20/2002 8:51:27 PM PDT by LoneGreenEyeshade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Cacique
Without a doubdt early mortality is cheaper for society in the long run.

Well, I can certainly think of a few people whose absence would likely benefit society. :~)

43 posted on 06/20/2002 8:53:05 PM PDT by LoneGreenEyeshade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
"You must be a fatso."

That's what I think. I made a passing comment on this post and recieved a negative comment in return from this person.

44 posted on 06/20/2002 9:08:46 PM PDT by blackbart.223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
"There are a lot more sedentary thin people than you think. And likewise, there are lots of active fat people."

These are exceptions to the rule. And the exception proves the rule.

45 posted on 06/20/2002 9:16:44 PM PDT by blackbart.223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: LoneGreenEyeshade
And this has what to do with "fast food"?
46 posted on 06/20/2002 9:52:21 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

Comment #47 Removed by Moderator

To: savedbygrace; blackbart.223
...there are lots of active fat people.

Yeah.
Their fingers get a real workout on the remote control while scooping Cheetos out of the bag.

48 posted on 06/20/2002 10:16:31 PM PDT by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: LoneGreenEyeshade
When you & the Doc come around to "educate" me, how will you make me follow it? Ahhhhh, here we go......

"I would like to suggest a different variable....eliminating fast food restaurants...or at least requiring a bold posting on each door, similiar to the one required on packs of cigarettes...."

Now, since under the new "GOVERNMENT GUIDELINES" both Tom Cruise & Michael Jordan are now overweight, which one is to report to your re-education camp first?


49 posted on 06/20/2002 10:20:42 PM PDT by SpeakLittle_ThinkMuch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
"Yeah. Their fingers get a real workout on the remote control while scooping Cheetos out of the bag."

Damn you. You just caused me to spit my drink on the keyboard.

50 posted on 06/20/2002 10:21:45 PM PDT by blackbart.223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
"As University of Virginia Professor Glen Gaesser(Gasser) points out in the forthcoming revised edition of his book, "Big Fat Lies"

Ironic, isn't it?

51 posted on 06/20/2002 10:30:54 PM PDT by blackbart.223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: blackbart.223
LMAO right now!
52 posted on 06/20/2002 10:34:23 PM PDT by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
LMAO ?
53 posted on 06/20/2002 11:17:55 PM PDT by blackbart.223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: LoneGreenEyeshade
Nutrition is taught in school already! How much more 'education' is needed? People know, but poor eating habits are often a function of laziness. Or... that enjoying food has a higher value than being slender in their estimations.
54 posted on 06/20/2002 11:27:20 PM PDT by technochick99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: LoneGreenEyeshade
In addition, I read somewhere (in some health book - maybe by Fumento) that the standards were changed not too long ago. That could account for some of the percentage difference. However, they went back to an older standard, which many felt was more accurate. I don't know which standard is better, but when you change the way you measure things, it should be noted.
55 posted on 06/20/2002 11:31:37 PM PDT by technochick99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: blackbart.223

This oughta help: The LEXICON of Free Republic

56 posted on 06/20/2002 11:42:09 PM PDT by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: LoneGreenEyeshade
Thanks for the source. I downloaded the study and read the Executive Summary. It says exactly what I thought it says. The 54.9% figure is for obese AND overweight people, not just obese.

Even so, they base the normal weight on figures sililar to those silly insurance charts that say people are supposed to look almost like Holocaust survivors.

In any event, you were wrong.

57 posted on 06/21/2002 4:02:51 AM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: blackbart.223
Thanks to LoneGreenEyeshade, I downloaded a research study about this. Reading the Executive Summary, I see that a 6'0" man weighing 221 pounds is obese. That's ridiculous.

Even so, using these definitions, fat people are in the majority now, so if they all vote as a group on these issues, look out. You'd better start treating them nice. LOL.

58 posted on 06/21/2002 4:11:02 AM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
I am really upset that Democrat Congressman Gerold Nadler will be buying 2 seats with taxpayer money. This type of pork has to stop. I suppose they will tell us to be happy they do not charge extra fro chins? Grrrrrrrr
59 posted on 06/21/2002 4:11:33 AM PDT by oldironsides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
So I'm right. Thanks for the confirmation.

You know, a fat person can lose weight and no longer be a fat person. You will always be a bigot and a moron.

There was a research study someone posted on FR a few months ago that concluded that incompetent people don't know they're incompetent. That must be why you keep going on. You just don't know it.

60 posted on 06/21/2002 4:16:42 AM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-159 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson