Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Junk science about obesity
Washington Times ^ | Thursday, June 20, 2002 | Paul Campos

Posted on 06/19/2002 11:21:13 PM PDT by JohnHuang2

Edited on 07/12/2004 3:54:50 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

An abiding weakness of the conventional wisdom is that, once a supposed fact has become part of that wisdom, it becomes almost impossible to dislodge it.

Contemporary journalism contributes to this problem by relying on technologies that help ensure an assertion, once it is repeated enough times, will never be checked against the actual evidence. Consider for example the claim that fat kills 300,000 Americans per year, and is thus the nation's second leading cause of premature death, trailing only cigarettes. A Lexis database search reveals that this "fact" has been repeated in more than one thousand news stories over the past three years alone. Yet the evidence for this claim is so slim as to be practically nonexistent.


(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: junkscience; obesity; pufflist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-159 next last
To: *puff_list
An abiding weakness of the conventional wisdom is that, once a supposed fact has become part of that wisdom, it becomes almost impossible to dislodge it.

After calculating the death risk associated with various weight levels derived from six epidemiological studies, the authors employed the following assumption: "Our calculations assume that all excess mortality in obese people is due to their [obesity]"

Journalists in particular ought to start noticing that fact, rather than endlessly reprinting the same piece of junk science.

Sound familiar people?

21 posted on 06/20/2002 9:59:07 AM PDT by Just another Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LoneGreenEyeshade
Are you sure? What's your source? I thought I read that over 50% (might have been 60%) are overweight, not all obese.
22 posted on 06/20/2002 10:14:27 AM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: blackbart.223
Tell us, what color is stupid? Just so we get it right.

If you'd read the article, you'd know that the research doesn't agree with you. There is undoubtedly a correlation between the two, but not to the extent you claim.

23 posted on 06/20/2002 10:16:37 AM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
Reading comprehension isn't one of your strengths, is it?

Or maybe the rest of the article had too many big words in it and you gave up after reading that far.

Sheesh.

24 posted on 06/20/2002 10:18:18 AM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
Because their abundant sweat destroys the upholstery.

Good thing for you the airlines don't charge morons and bigots extra to fly.

25 posted on 06/20/2002 10:20:00 AM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LoneGreenEyeshade
"I think it's time for some nutritional education as well."

As an official member of the "food police", will you be enforcing your "nutritional education" by fines or jail time?
26 posted on 06/20/2002 10:26:46 AM PDT by SpeakLittle_ThinkMuch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
A Lexis database search reveals that this "fact" has been repeated in more than one thousand news stories over the past three years alone. Yet the evidence for this claim is so slim as to be practically nonexistent.

Funny, it's the same with smoking, but nobody listens.

27 posted on 06/20/2002 12:37:15 PM PDT by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
I agree, but I sure wish the government would stop confiscating our money to pay for the medical expenses these people rack up as a result of their exercise of their freedom to stuff their faces and never exercise.

As I have asked before, where would you draw the line, Aids sufferers, Alcoholics, druggies, let's face it most of our illnesses are selfinflicted, are you sure you are living such a perfect life as not to have any medical bills. ?

28 posted on 06/20/2002 12:42:08 PM PDT by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
ping
29 posted on 06/20/2002 12:49:14 PM PDT by Fifth Business
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
Because their abundant sweat destroys the upholstery.

That, and they squish the seat cushions all down so the frame pokes the bony-assed in tender places.
30 posted on 06/20/2002 12:52:05 PM PDT by Xenalyte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I was at a party this weekend and two of the lades were yukking it up over the fact that they both tipped the scales at over 250 lbs. Neither was more than 25 Y.O.

Jolly fat people.

Walt

31 posted on 06/20/2002 12:55:43 PM PDT by WhiskeyPapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LoneGreenEyeshade
Yes, 60% are obese. That doesn't make fast food the cause.

The fact that food is plentiful and cheap is a bigger factor. The biggest factor is likely inactivity. Most of us sit and work. The percentage of people who sit and work is increasing in the age of the computer.

32 posted on 06/20/2002 3:43:53 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
"If you'd read the article, you'd know that the research doesn't agree with you. There is undoubtedly a correlation between the two, but not to the extent you claim."

We have been told that eating the wrong food and sitting on our butts makes us fat. That's bad for our health. Now some other "expert" claims the opposite. Who do you believe? I was a paramedic at one point in my life and I can tell you overweight people tend to die sooner and have more health problems. It's a fact. But I don't believe the nanny state should stick their nose in anyone's business and tell them how to eat or behave.

Finally, did my comments strike a nerve?

33 posted on 06/20/2002 7:41:36 PM PDT by blackbart.223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: blackbart.223
Again you didn't read. I agree there's a correlation, but NOT to the extent you claim.

There are a lot more sedentary thin people than you think. And likewise, there are lots of active fat people.

Apparently, there are other factors at play.

As a paramedic, you were exposed to a subset of the population, those who were in need of medical care. From that you have drawn conclusions that are not entirely true.

34 posted on 06/20/2002 8:05:32 PM PDT by savedbygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
Reading comprehension isn't one of your strengths, is it? Or maybe the rest of the article had too many big words in it and you gave up after reading that far. Sheesh.

You must be a fatso.

35 posted on 06/20/2002 8:17:12 PM PDT by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: SpeakLittle_ThinkMuch
As an official member of the "food police", will you be enforcing your "nutritional education" by fines or jail time?

I never said anything about being "food police." I merely think people should possess knowledge. Or are you opposed to knowledge? Ignorance is bliss, hey? And ignorance is much easier to control....

36 posted on 06/20/2002 8:20:30 PM PDT by LoneGreenEyeshade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte
Judging by posts 24 & 25, "savedbygrace" isn't offering me any.
Bony, huh?
37 posted on 06/20/2002 8:21:52 PM PDT by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: DB
I did a search and was swamped with info. I picked a few of the more relevant statements From the National Library of Medicine (excerpts)

[There is] a strong association between the prevalence of obesity and cardio vascular disease risk factors…

the prevalence of hypertension (blood pressure greater than 160/95) is 2.9 times higher for the overweight than for the nonoverweight. The prevalence is 5.6 times higher for the young (20 through 44 years old) overweight than for the nonoverweight subjects in this age group. The prevalence is twice as high for the obese older (45 through 74 years old) group as it is for the nonoverweight subjects of the same age.

The prevalence of hypercholesterolemia(blood cholesterol over 250 mg/dl) in the young overweight age group is 2.1 times that of the nonoverweight group; overweight and nonoverweight subjects show similar prevalences for hypercholesterolemia after age 45.

The prevalence of reported diabetes is 2.9 times higher in overweight than nonoverweight persons…

there is a positive relationship of obesity to the risk of coronary artery heart disease…

Obese males, regardless of smoking habits, had a higher mortality from cancer of the colon, rectum, and prostate. Obese females had a higher mortality from cancer of the gallbladder, biliary passages, breast (postmenopausal), uterus (including both cervix and endometrium), and ovaries. In the case of endometrial cancer, women with marked obesity showed the highest relative risk (5.4) for the obese versus the nonobese.

38 posted on 06/20/2002 8:23:45 PM PDT by LoneGreenEyeshade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blackbart.223
But I don't believe the nanny state should stick their nose in anyone's business and tell them how to eat or behave.

I agree. No one should tell you how or what to eat. But I am amazed how ignorant people can be----they are clueless as to the absence of nutrional value in the food they feed their kids and themselves. As a former teacher, I saw kids come to school with home packed lunches consisting of Twinkies, a candy bar, and chocolate milk. When we had a nutrition class, parents were literally shocked.

It's about education. The medical community has long been silent on nutrition and preventitive medicine. It is only recently that some doctors are starting to teach their patients about nutrition. Maybe that is because it is relatively recently that a class in nutrition has become required in order to get an MD. MD's have generally focused on disease or "dis" ease, not on health.

It's not about being a policeman, it's about education, realization and accepting responsibility.

39 posted on 06/20/2002 8:30:59 PM PDT by LoneGreenEyeshade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Many people replying to this article either didn't read it or didn't understand it. The article is saying that the notion that people die of obesity is unproven and is junk science.

There sure are a lot of fat old ladies around. My grandmother is 89 years old and she has been fat all her life. Furthermore, she has been up at 4:30 in the morning making biscuits, bacon, eggs and gravy for over 70 years now. Don't see a lot of fat old men though. Guess that means I ought to take a few pounds off while my wife gets to stay as fat as she wants. Bummer.

Since somebody mentioned the airlines in this thread, might as well throw my two cents in. I think airlines should charge by the pound. Passengers should get on a scale and pay XX amount per pound, depending on how far they will be flying that day. That would solve a lot of problems and those weigh a lot will be charged enough money to warrant two seats.

I don't want to sit next to fat people on the airplane and I sure as hell don't want to sit next to myself either. Not until I take a few pounds off, anyhow.

Speaking of fast food, it's not the fast food that does me in but the slow food.

40 posted on 06/20/2002 8:32:39 PM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-159 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson