Posted on 06/14/2002 11:09:07 PM PDT by Polycarp
![]() |
||||||||||||
![]() |
In 1992 the Archdiocese of Chicago reviewed some 2,252 priest personnel files. They found that 40 priests 1.8 percent had been guilty of sexual misconduct at some point in their career. Of that 40, only one was a pedophile. Another study by Penn State Professor Philip Jenkins reveals that a mere .3 percent of priests are pedophiles. Married men abuse children in far greater numbers. Anywhere from 3 to 8 percent if you believe the studies. So statistically, children are far safer with the celibates. As the U.S. cardinals said in their report of April 24: "a link between celibacy and pedophilia cannot be scientifically maintained." "But if only these men had a spouse, a sexual outlet, they would not need to turn to kids" goes the conventional wisdom (and the screeds regularly littering the op-ed pages). Aside from reducing women to little more than child-protection devices, there are logical holes here. Putting aside the media fixation with the Catholic Church it is important to point out, as the Christian Science Monitor recently did, that the majority of sexual-abuse allegations in America occur in Protestant churches. There are 3,500 sex-abuse allegations a year roughly 70 a week in Protestant churches according to the Christian Ministry Resource Survey. Remember, these are churches where married clergy and volunteers predominate. If the objective is to stop the abuse before us, and prohibit its happening again- the Protestant statistics prove marriage is no insurance policy. Since the victims in 98 percent of the alleged Catholic abuse cases were teenage boys, allowing priests to marry (women) seems a pointless solution. There is just no correlation between the offense and the corrective. It's a little like offering the alcoholic priest the deed to a dairy and calling him cured. If you believe the folks on TV, celibacy was something "imposed on the priesthood" during the Middle Ages to keep the children of clerics from inheriting Church property. If I had a dime for every time I've heard this. Actually, the real history is far more interesting, and complex. To begin with, Christ himself was a celibate so it is no surprise that the early Church and the Scripture itself salutes and commends the practice. In Matthew's Gospel, Christ lauds those who "make themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven." In his first letter to the Corinthians St. Paul, another celibate, writes: "the unmarried man is anxious about the affairs of the Lord....but the married man is anxious about worldly affairs, how to please his wife, and his interests are divided." From the time of Christ forward celibacy was the Catholic norm for priests married clergy were merely tolerated. Certainly by the 4th century there is little doubt where the Church stood on the matter. In 385, Pope Siricius issued the first papal decree on priestly celibacy. Five years later, the Council of Carthage announced: "Previous councils have decreed that bishops, priests, and deacons must be continent and perfectly chaste, as becomes ministers of God...as the Apostles taught." By the Council of Toledo in 633, a bishop's permission was needed for a priest to marry. Finally in 1139, Pope Gregory VII declared celibacy mandatory for all priests; formalizing in law what was already the general practice for centuries. And the canard that protecting Church land rights drove the papacy to the discipline of celibacy just isn't true. But there is a spiritual explanation. Starting in the third century married priests were required to abstain from sex the night before offering Mass. The notion being: Separate yourselves from the worldly and focus on the transcendent. As the demand for the sacraments increased, these men were abstaining from sex all the time. Thus, like all things in the Church, a practice rooted in tradition evolved over time and eventually was codified into law. At a time when the world is so transfixed by the deviant, where all mysteries are laid bare, these celibate men and women are a contradiction: a people set apart, people who have saved the most precious part of themselves for God alone. The world needs that example and purity today more than ever. In the final analysis we are right to condemn, and bring to justice those non-celibate clergymen guilty of these heinous crimes, but let us not strike out against those who faithfully observe their vows to God and continue to walk steadily down this holy and well-trodden path of sacrifice. Raymond Arroyo is news director and host of The World Over on EWTN, the world's largest religious network. He writes from New Orleans. |
![]() |
|
![]() |
||||||||
|
![]() |
||||
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-arroyo051602.asp
|
Which I believe is the reason for the Pope's recent statement on preparing men for the priesthood and men and women for the religious life. He re-states the Church's teachings on celibacy, stressing chastity. In the Church's mind, the two are synonymous, and anyone who tries to separate the two in order to bypass the teaching is trying to justify sinful behavior.
Don't popes do that all the time?
There's a thought. Perhaps this is the treatment needed for the pedophile priests. Turn them into "eunuchs". Is it too late to propose this as an addendum to the charter drafted by the bishops in Dallas?
I have never heard of a single case in a Baptist, Methodist, Lutheran, etc. church of a pastor raping little tiny helpless six year old boys!!! NEVER!!!!Guess again.
From the back cover:
Of that night in 1983, when she first met Brother Tony, Macalynn Embert recalled: I was impressed with the fact that he didnt know me at all and yet he was able to minister over me in the way that he did.Tony Leyva had 100s and 100s of victims himself, and nearly a thousand victims in his ring. See Brother Tonys Boys, by Mike Echols.
Taking her sons with her, Macalynn drove to the West Palm Beach Civic Center to attend another of Brother Tonys revivals. Afterward she proudly marched Jason, age ten, and Kenny, fourteen, up to meet this charismatic preacher. After the service, Macalynn said, Jason walked up to where Tony was sitting playing the piano and the very first thing Tony did was to stop playing and ask Jason to turn around for him just like a model. Then he smiled at Jason and put his arm around him and asked, Wheres your daddy? Jason told him that he didnt have one and at that Tony just lit up like a Christmas tree.From that time on, my relationship with Tony started growing and Jason and Kennys relationships with him started growing, too. Before the summer was over he took the boys by themselves for two weeks over at Pastor Kellys place out of town.
Once there Brother Tony wasted no time in slickly ingratiating himself with his two young guests. He required both to sleep with him in the same bed and during the night pulled down Jasons underpants. Although confused by this, Jason lay still and said nothing. He thought I was sleeping, Jason said, cause the next morning he asked me was I awake and I said , no.
You are seriously deluded if you think only Catholics have this problem. There is no Catholic out there that even comes close to Brother Tony.
patent +AMDG
SuziQ: "Which I believe is the reason for the Pope's recent statement on preparing men for the priesthood and men and women for the religious life. He re-states the Church's teachings on celibacy, stressing chastity. In the Church's mind, the two are synonymous."
I agree 100%.
"Anyone who tries to separate the two in order to bypass the teaching is trying to justify sinful behavior.
I agree 100%. They are not separate, just distinct. Avowed celibacy implies total chastity of the unmarried state.
My own thought is that precision of language is a means of attacking the Modernists' arguments. Maryz and Smedleybutler are correct that common-usage English equates the two terms.
Pray to St. Peter Damian for reform.
Submit to the will of the Pope? On a non-doctrinal matter?
Catholics are free to dissent on incidentals, and celibacy is an incidental.
They are also free to dissent on issues like capital punishment, which are not matters of the ordinary or extraordinary magisterium.
There is a married clergy: married deacons and the Anglican dispensation. And, there will be more.
Great clarification.
Does not the book, Acts of the Apostles, talk about Peter at the First Coucil of Jerusalem? What about that?
Let us pray that the visits to the seminaries will be unannounced (I doubt it.) and that seminarians will tell the truth when questionsed by the team the Pope is sending out.
My son has traveled through many churches and is on his way back to the RC Church -- now in an Anglican Church -- and this morning her asked me: Do any of your sermons given by priests talk about Protestants -- downgrading them?
I was astounded by his question, but preaching Anti-Catholicism must be quite common in some Protestant churches.
(I am naive here? Or does anyone wish to comment if they have experienced this inside a Protestant Church?)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.