1 posted on
06/13/2002 3:53:53 PM PDT by
xsysmgr
To: xsysmgr
Nice post - I saw it at Reason's site yesterday. I was forced to read this pap in 1980 (at a Catholic school!)
To: xsysmgr
See more good stuff
here.
To: xsysmgr
To: xsysmgr
This post is an illusion. According to Carson, we're all dead now.
To: all
Please excuse this short interruption. As you know, the fundraiser is in full swing. We need your help.
Please stop by the fundraising thread and give it a bump. And if you have a few bucks, we'd really appreciate a contribution to keep this site running. IMO, it's the best site on the internet for news and analysis.
Donate Here By Secure Server Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
Thank you for your support!
8 posted on
06/13/2002 4:10:33 PM PDT by
WIMom
To: xsysmgr;all
9 posted on
06/13/2002 4:25:09 PM PDT by
backhoe
To: xsysmgr
If the muslims don't get us, the environ-whackoos will!
10 posted on
06/13/2002 4:27:44 PM PDT by
exnavy
To: xsysmgr
DDT was soon widely deployed by public health officials, who banished malaria from the southern United States with its help. The World Health Organization credits DDT with saving 50 million to 100 million lives by preventing malaria. In 1943 Venezuela had 8,171,115 cases of malaria; by 1958, after the use of DDT, the number was down to 800. India, which had over 10 million cases of malaria in 1935, had 285,962 in 1969. In Italy the number of malaria cases dropped from 411,602 in 1945 to only 37 in 1968. And the envirowackos are more concerned with the snail darter!
SURGEON GENERAL WARNING
ENVIRONMENTAL EXTREMESTS ARE DANGEROUS TO YOUR HEALTH
13 posted on
06/13/2002 4:43:25 PM PDT by
mc5cents
To: xsysmgr
The point could be made that Rachel Carson is (somewhat)responsible for the deaths (by Malaria) of more people than any of the other big 20th century killers like Hitler and Stalin.
To: xsysmgr
The scientific controversy over the effects of DDT on wildlife, especially birds, still vexes researchers. Only because it's garbage and they're still trying to justify the ban.
In the late 1960s, some researchers concluded that exposure to DDT caused eggshell thinning in some bird species, especially raptors such as eagles and peregrine falcons. Thinner shells meant fewer hatchlings and declining numbers. But researchers also found that other bird species, such as quail, pheasants, and chickens, were unaffected even by large doses DDT.
Audubon Society bird count data show that nearly every single bird species INCREASED in population during the production of DDT, some radically so. The pesticide killed mites that infected the birds. Egg shell thinning can be caused by dehydration, stress, or a low calcium diet. The thinning of pelicans eggs on Annacappa were because of seeping crude oil (which can be reduced by drilling it BTW).
Banning DDT left us with organo-phosphates as the only alternative, a FAR more toxic pesticide than DDT. The licensing procedures that developed prevented development of less toxic alternatives because it is too expensive to prove that they cause no harm.
I could go on at length, but I already did.
To: xsysmgr
Good post. But Silent Spring was aging too well 20 something years ago. Did any Freeper ever read a book called "The Disaster Lobby". (I think that was the name. I got it somewhere in a box.)
16 posted on
06/13/2002 6:00:32 PM PDT by
parsifal
To: xsysmgr
If only her attack on DDT had come sooner, the chinch could still be competing with the Roach as the number one pest of the land.
What has the ilk of Rachel Carson ever done for their own species-that is the question? Or is the question: What the h*ll is their species??????
To: xsysmgr
Meanwhile, Carsons disciples have managed to persuade many poor countries to stop using DDT against mosquitoes. The result has been an enormous increase in the number of people dying of malaria each year. Today malaria infects between 300 million and 500 million people annually, killing as many 2.7 million of them. Millions dead, all for the sake of bolstering the New Yorker-reading Chardonnay socialists' self esteem. Still, they're only darkies in foreign lands, so I guess it's a fair trade, in the grand utilitarian scheme of things.
To: xsysmgr
BTTT
26 posted on
06/14/2002 10:05:17 AM PDT by
hattend
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson