Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Pushes Gore Plan For Orwellian Government
NewsWithViews.com ^ | Chuck Baldwin

Posted on 06/12/2002 11:34:46 AM PDT by Sir Gawain

BUSH PUSHES GORE PLAN FOR ORWELLIAN GOVERNMENT

 
By Chuck Baldwin
June 11, 2002
NewsWithViews.com

Those who voted for G. W. Bush thinking they were getting a significantly different type of government from the Clinton-Gore years need to think again. Bush's proposal to consolidate federal law enforcement and civil defense capabilities is actually a replay of an old plan first submitted by Al Gore.

A June 10 CNS news report stated, "Some members of Congress, Democrats and Republicans alike, were surprised by President Bush's proposed consolidation of federal law enforcement and civil defense capabilities under a new cabinet level Department of Homeland Security.

"But some are even more surprised to learn the plan has much in common with a nine-year-old idea hatched in the Clinton-Gore administration, which proposed a significant expansion of domestic police powers."

The report further stated, "Numerous components of President Bush's proposal, which were sketched out in a televised address last Thursday, are strikingly similar to a plan proposed by former Vice President Al Gore as part of the Clinton-Gore 'Partnership for Reinventing Government' in 1993."

The Bush-Gore plan to "reinvent government" is, in fact, nothing new. It is as old as tyranny itself - and that is exactly what the Bush-Gore plan is: a modern attempt to reinstall tyrannical government.

In the British newspaper, The Register, Thomas Greene states, "The real purpose (of Bush's proposal), clearly, is data acquisition, mining and manipulation on a gargantuan scale." He is right. Bush's reintroduction of the Clinton-Gore plan has shades of Hitler's SS corps. It is the beginning of a national police force in the United States.

Of course, when Al Gore submitted this plan back in 1993, vociferous opposition from the entire conservative community resisted it. As a result, the plan was summarily defeated.

However, things are different now. A Republican occupies the White House. Furthermore, the terrorist attacks in New York and Washington have created a "security-at-all-costs" mentality among the American people. Because of this, Bush will succeed in implementing the Clinton-Gore plan of freedom confiscation with little or no opposition.

What really takes the cake is the manner in which President Bush continues to coddle illegal aliens. He refuses to deport those whom U.S. law requires to be deported, he continues to promote the concept of granting amnesty to millions of illegal aliens, he refuses to take serious measures to keep likely terrorists out of our country, yet, he seems determined to thoroughly dismantle constitutional protection of our liberties.

What conservatives would have never surrendered to Al Gore, they seem happy to acquiesce to George Bush. However, the Clinton- Gore plan to eviscerate America's liberties smells as rotten (even worse) when George Bush regurgitates it! So, what has happened to conservatives' smellers?

 



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 721 next last
To: daiuy
Mexicans flew plains into the WTC, the Pentagon, and tried for the White House, in 20201 ? Mexicans tried to blo wup the WTC in 1993 ? Mexicans blew up two American embassies in Africa ? Mexicans hit the USS COLE ? Mexicans have joine al Qaeda ? Mexicans are planing to use " dirty bombs " to blow up GOD only knows what, next ?

REALLY ?

121 posted on 06/13/2002 9:41:46 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Washington_minuteman
There are suitcase nukes out there somewhere, capable of taking a million lives in a flash, and enough fanatical idiots willing to sacrifice themselves in the name of their obscene God while killing as many of us as possible to carry out the mission.

How do you propose that we located them, and stop them?

Don't forget, "them" may be "us". We've already seen that.

122 posted on 06/13/2002 9:42:13 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Pistias
The people who perpetrated the attacks on 9/11 USED the decentralization of US intelligence agencies to their advantage.
123 posted on 06/13/2002 9:44:02 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Washington_minuteman
I'm with ya, friend!
124 posted on 06/13/2002 9:45:19 PM PDT by BillofRights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: gunshy
Blonde, blue eyed , Roman Catholic , illegal Irish are going to bomb N.Y.C. ? Oh, but then, most of the terrorists were here LEFALLY , dear.

The president / government can deport 8th ( or more ) generation American citizens, because they are " undesireables ? TO WHERE ? Do you even bother to t=attempt to think befire you post such nonsense ?

125 posted on 06/13/2002 9:47:32 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: gunshy
Blonde, blue eyed , Roman Catholic , illegal Irish are going to bomb N.Y.C. ? Oh, but then, most of the terrorists were here LEFALLY , dear.

The president / government can deport 8th ( or more ) generation American citizens, because they are " undesireables ? TO WHERE ? Do you even bother to t=attempt to think before you post such nonsense ?

126 posted on 06/13/2002 9:47:49 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Bush has rescinded "some" of Clinton's E.O.s, you say.

If so, I plead guilty for not doing my homework. But, knowing FReepers, the news would have been on these pages like wildfire in Colorado - and I haven't seen them.

127 posted on 06/13/2002 9:48:41 PM PDT by lakey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

Comment #128 Removed by Moderator

To: daiuy
One was a Puerto Rican, which makes him a natural-born American citizen, and nowhere NEAR south of the border.

There wasn't a single mexican in the whole bunch.

129 posted on 06/13/2002 9:49:34 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
By equalizing the figures for population growth, there were far more immigrants ( legal and illegal ) in during the first third of the 20th century.
130 posted on 06/13/2002 9:51:41 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Washington_minuteman
Balkinization is already here; the government is encouraging it, and there are not enough of us to undo the damage that has been done.

i know what you mean, but i'm beginning to think there may be more out there who feel as you do than ever before. i'm meeting people almost daily who share this view. i'm seeing it right here on freerepublic.

a lot of us are aware of the "two headed beast."

131 posted on 06/13/2002 9:55:28 PM PDT by christine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Before you answer, name me a time in the history of the nation when people did not routinely cross the border illegaly

Actually, for most of US history, it was rather difficult to enter illegally, since most everyone but the diseased and criminals were let in prior to 1924, when the door was shut on Asians mostly. And prior to 1964, most everyone from the Western Hemisphere, including all those Mexicans, were allowed to enter legally. The tension post 1964 came from the population explosion in Mexico, which explosion is now over. But folks enjoy fighting the last war.

132 posted on 06/13/2002 9:55:31 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
Playing the race card I see.
133 posted on 06/13/2002 9:56:02 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: lakey
They WERE ! How do you suppose that I know about the ; it wasn't on the network news.

You may read FR ; however , your don't read FR !

134 posted on 06/13/2002 9:59:27 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Torie; MissAmericanPie
Post #100 is a perfect example of the point that I've been trying to make all along. It isn't about the illegals, it's about skin tone.

BTW MAP, I actually respect your standing by your beliefs like you did in that post.

135 posted on 06/13/2002 10:00:24 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Ah, but Luis, that Puerto Rican was born in Brooklyn ; which the last time I looked, was one of the 5 boroughs, which make up N.Y.C. and is most assuredly part of the contiguous USA !
136 posted on 06/13/2002 10:01:44 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
What has happened?
Where were you on Sept 11?
137 posted on 06/13/2002 10:03:04 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
My father-in-law is from Jersey, he says that Brooklyn ain't no part of the US of A.
138 posted on 06/13/2002 10:03:30 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Did you ever hear of OTM's (Other than Mexicans)????

It appears that "MANY" Easterners have been passing over the Mexican borders.

There needs to be control of the Mexican border and the Canadian border, period.

DL

139 posted on 06/13/2002 10:04:28 PM PDT by Pee_Oui
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: lakey
If so, I plead guilty for not doing my homework. But, knowing FReepers, the news would have been on these pages like wildfire in Colorado - and I haven't seen them.

He rescinded 6 in his first week in office. Old news. He has yet to release any of the Clinton EO's that had not been published in the National Register and the rest are not EO's but Monument Declarations not subject to be overturned by a new president.

140 posted on 06/13/2002 10:04:57 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 721 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson