Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Patrick B. McGuigan: Conservative leader attacked
The Daily Oklahoman (America's Premier Conservative Editorial Pages) ^ | 12 June 2002 | Patrick B. McGuigan

Posted on 06/12/2002 8:57:53 AM PDT by PhiKapMom

Patrick B. McGuigan: Conservative leader attacked

2002-06-12
By Patrick B. McGuigan

Chad Alexander, chairman of Oklahoma's Republican Party, is aggravated over the dubious alliances of the other party's leadership. His strong pro-family stance has infuriated an activist homosexual group known for supporting Democrats.

In a press release last Friday, the Cimarron Alliance Group said a statement by the GOP leader showed the party of Lincoln had "at central core the ideology of extermination and eradication of a social minority." They said Alexander's words "were no less hate-inspiring than those Hitler used during World War II." The group demanded that the state Republican Party "make an official retraction of Mr. Alexander's statements" and "require (him) to issue and (sic) apology." The group said unless the state GOP retracted the party chairman's words, the organization would "be unable to support any Republican candidate who does not specifically and unequivocally renounce Mr. Alexander."

The activist homosexual group's statement was characteristic of that movement's tactics elsewhere in the nation in recent years, seeking to compel cultural conservatives within journalism, academics, broadcasting and other influential fields into silence.

Although Alexander is best known for advocacy of lower taxes, smaller government and the congressional redistricting plan designed to enhance Oklahoma's incumbent clout, he is also pro-life. He holds traditional mainstream conservative views on the homosexual activist agenda and other so-called "social issues" -- matters which might more aptly be characterized as cultural and moral.

Alexander countered the Cimarron Alliance's attack, saying, "What we are concerned with is the public policies that certain gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender groups support. They push a very liberal agenda that does not have a place in Oklahoma or the Republican Party. ... Because I have a principled difference with these organizations on public policy they have decided to pick a fight ... by comparing me to a mass murderer."

What drew the ire of the activist homosexual group was a May 29 statement in which Alexander decried the Oklahoma Democratic Party's willingness to support "the left-wing homosexual agenda" by hosting a convention for "Stonewall Democrats." That group is described as a "gay and lesbian" Democratic club.

Alexander said the co-hosting move was "just further evidence of the growing control the radical homosexual lobby has over the Oklahoma Democrat Party. Now we can better understand why Attorney General Drew Edmondson joined with leftist homosexual groups in suing the Boy Scouts of America." The Cimarron Alliance Group characterizes Alexander's words as "bigoted and divisive."

Alexander pointed to the Stonewall Democrats' Web site which indicates the group's activities are coordinated with the party's formal leadership. He said the site also indicates the Stonewall group "seeks to maximize turnout for pro- homosexual candidates in order to facilitate the election of Democrats."

In his original release, Alexander said he was speaking out because state Democrats are trying to appeal to moderates and conservatives. But he remarked, "How can the Oklahoma Democrat Party continue to claim that they're conservatives, while at the same time hosting conventions that promote the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender agenda?"

Alexander's original release also jabbed at the Stonewall Democrats for plans to hold a brunch with Gov. Howard Dean of Vermont. Dean signed a "gay marriage" statute after that the Supreme Court of that state pressured the Legislature to act.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: Oklahoma
KEYWORDS: conservativevoice; gayagenda; okgaysrats; okgop
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: 1bigdictator
Thanks much for your posts! With people like you on our side, we are going to win! You are so perceptive in what you have posted! I am one of those one voter at a time type people and pretty soon you have a lot of voters.

Keep up the great work! We need a lot of folks like you!

21 posted on 06/12/2002 9:54:57 AM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 1bigdictator
Many of Hitler's Brown shirts were gay, including their leader Earnst Rhoem. The left-wing homo lobby always fail to mention that.
22 posted on 06/12/2002 10:12:06 AM PDT by ohioman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom;joanie-f;snopercod;brityank
Madam,

This thread is filled with references to NAZI's, the German National Socialists, hate, and fascism.

Since you have determined to close your mind, you will therefore not observe who is the author of the article which I referred to you ... and what its many benefits of helping your arguments (elsewhere on this thread).

I did you a favor, but because you elect to "not change [your] mind," it escapes you.

Your happiness with getting a handle on things and improving your lot, was my interest too.

PLEASE bother to use the Google search engine and look up the author. I am certain you would be surprised to find out where he came from and why he says the things that he has; and painstakingly so "!"

Your faithful servant,

F_S

23 posted on 06/12/2002 10:13:15 AM PDT by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Hi PKM.

This article points out, the typical trashtalk employed by small minded individuals and who, when they can't get their way, revert to personal attacks, insults and ad hominem rhetoric. Jim Robinson has requested we all stop attacking each other, but the fringe reactionary extremists, aren't heeding Jim's requests. Very inconsiderate, if you ask me. They're bound and determined to throw out all manner of inflammatory garbage, which then instigates all out flame wars within FreeRepublic's dominant rightwing. As I always say, this type of absolutism serves no good purpose in the political arena. OTOH, I've received many emails in support of the real conservative agenda and how that agenda can be implimented through the actions of the Republican Party. There may be a core group of FReepers, who constantly step over the line of fairness and decency, but there are many more FReepers who are highly vocal and passionate about real conservative issues. These folks, these true blue conservatives, can see through the extremist agenda and the outrageous behavior of this fringe loudmouth coalition, of misfits and malcontents.

24 posted on 06/12/2002 10:15:20 AM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom;joanie-f;snopercod
Please see FRPR ohioman's R'22; with reference to the narcissim, I hasten to add, which bizarre rot affected various of Hitler's hierarchy from the start.

Again, I refer you to furtherance of your knowledge about Mr. Hayek and his learned observations.

Sincerely,

F_S

25 posted on 06/12/2002 10:17:06 AM PDT by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
In a press release last Friday, the Cimarron Alliance Group said...unless the state GOP retracted the party chairman's words, the organization would "be unable to support any Republican candidate who does not specifically and unequivocally renounce Mr. Alexander."

Past experiences (and a quick trip to the Cimarron Alliance Group website), confirm to me that this group never had any intentions of supporting any Republican candidate regardless of their stand on this issue.

From their website:

Our immediate plans include electing progressive candidates for statewide office and defeating candidates opposed to human rights.

I guess it all depends on your definition of progressive and human rights. In my opinion, they are searching for candidates that will push their agenda; Republicans need not apply, as they are analogous to genocidal maniacs. And we are supposed to take these folks seriously...please! </stating the obvious
26 posted on 06/12/2002 10:17:32 AM PDT by rwfok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: First_Salute
Thanks for the info!
27 posted on 06/12/2002 10:26:23 AM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: rwfok
Thanks for your comments! That was my thought also that they were never going to support Republicans.

Seems our illustrous Attorney General who is up for re-election is touting their Agenda. I couln't believe it when he went against the Boy Scouts and then joined the Gore lawsuit to overturn the Florida election and he was representing this State which was totally opposed to both his actions. Guess we know now who is running the DemocRAT Party in OK!

28 posted on 06/12/2002 10:28:38 AM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom;snopercod
The Friedrich Hayek Scholars' Page

Your bookmarking this page, will serve you well.

Please note, there, the book by Tammy Bruce, The New Thought Police --- it has very much to do with your concerns, which are also my concerns.

Sincerely,

F_S

29 posted on 06/12/2002 10:32:28 AM PDT by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
All the namecalling recently sure points at a lot of disruptors on here and it is nice to know that Freepers are not going to let them take over the forum!

When they don't post facts and call names instead, you know something is up!

Thanks for your post!

30 posted on 06/12/2002 10:33:43 AM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
I would expect Alexander to run after completing his tenue as head of the OK GOP. He has the right credentials IMHO!

we need to make sure he does! What a great asset to our state!

31 posted on 06/12/2002 10:42:06 AM PDT by Frank Grimes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
The group said unless the state GOP retracted the party chairman's words, the organization would "be unable to support any Republican candidate who does not specifically and unequivocally renounce Mr. Alexander."

Were I Mr. Alexander, I would tell this group to stick it and wear their 'unendorsement' like a badge of honor. It's time to stop giving these wretched little homo-promo interest groups any respect at all.
32 posted on 06/12/2002 10:44:33 AM PDT by Antoninus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

33 posted on 06/12/2002 10:45:20 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Next time something like that happens, I am going to ping everyone to write and complain!

Please do! I like nothing better than bombarding these people with email.
34 posted on 06/12/2002 10:48:16 AM PDT by Antoninus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
said Alexander's words "were no less hate-inspiring than those Hitler used during World War II."

Someone call the mental hospital. Since when those gays can tell us how to think when we are forbiden to tell them how to behave?????

hypocrit socialist f@gs.

35 posted on 06/12/2002 10:49:01 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Stop the attacks by the wacko, extreme, left-wing, homosexual terrorist's on our Freedoms !!

Freedom Is Worth Fighting For !!

Molon Labe !!

36 posted on 06/12/2002 12:21:34 PM PDT by blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
i used to drive a vw beetle. i guess i am guilty.
37 posted on 06/12/2002 12:27:36 PM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
38 posted on 06/12/2002 3:19:41 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: First_Salute
I reread what you posted! I thought this was in relation to the Homeland Security after the first part and should have read more closely! Thanks for bringing that to my attention.
39 posted on 06/12/2002 3:21:22 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
What happened last week was it was posted as a Washington Times article with Gay Pride Party not listed in the subject so if you didn't click on it no one would have known. I should have asked the poster to put up with the info of what it was in the subject. Didn't think about it until it was too late to get everyone on board.

Next time I will do just that so everyone knows what is going on with our tax dollars.

40 posted on 06/12/2002 3:25:05 PM PDT by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson