[rwfok]

In a press release last Friday, the Cimarron Alliance Group said...unless the state GOP retracted the party chairman's words, the organization would "be unable to support any Republican candidate who does not specifically and unequivocally renounce Mr. Alexander."

Past experiences (and a quick trip to the Cimarron Alliance Group website), confirm to me that this group never had any intentions of supporting any Republican candidate regardless of their stand on this issue.

From their website:

Our immediate plans include electing progressive candidates for statewide office and defeating candidates opposed to human rights.

I guess it all depends on your definition of progressive and human rights. In my opinion, they are searching for candidates that will push their agenda; Republicans need not apply, as they are analogous to genocidal maniacs. And we are supposed to take these folks seriously...please! </stating the obvious

[PhiKapMom]

Thanks for your comments! That was my thought also that they were never going to support Republicans.

Seems our illustrous Attorney General who is up for re-election is touting their Agenda. I couln't believe it when he went against the Boy Scouts and then joined the Gore lawsuit to overturn the Florida election and he was representing this State which was totally opposed to both his actions. Guess we know now who is running the DemocRAT Party in OK!