Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll: Four in Five Americans Would Give Up Some Freedom for More Security (MORON ALERT)
Tampa Bay Online (AP) ^ | 6-11-02 | Jennifer L. Brown

Posted on 06/11/2002 6:39:05 AM PDT by Boonie Rat

Poll: Four in Five Americans Would Give Up Some Freedom for More Security

By Jennifer L. Brown Associated Press Writer

Published: Jun 11, 2002

OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) - Four in five Americans would give up some freedoms to gain security and four in 10 worry terrorists will harm them or their family, a new Gallup poll shows.

About one-third of those polled favor making it easier for authorities to access private e-mail and telephone conversations. More than 70 percent are in favor of requiring U.S. citizens to carry identification cards with fingerprints, and 77 percent believe all Americans should have smallpox vaccinations.

"It was amazing the percentage of people who are willing to give up freedom to get back some sense of personal security," said Elaine Christiansen, senior research director for The Gallup Organization. "These aren't people who were necessarily near the twin towers, near the Pentagon, near the Murrah building. These are average people."

The telephone survey, conducted in March, included 934 people across the country. Researchers also polled about 500 people in each of three cities where terrorist attacks occurred - New York City, Washington, D.C., and Oklahoma City - to compare results with the general population survey.

The poll showed 8 percent of Americans are very worried and 31 percent are somewhat worried that they or someone in their family will become victims of a terrorist attack in the United States. In New York City, the level of worry is higher - 19 percent said they are very worried and 34 percent said they are somewhat worried.

Washington, D.C, and Oklahoma City reported levels of fear close to the national average.

Scientists involved in the poll said they were not surprised many Americans remain fearful after Sept. 11.

"The magnitude of the event was just so profound," said Carol North, a psychiatry professor at Washington University in St. Louis, who said talk of the war in Afghanistan, airline security and terrorist threats is propelling the fear.

The study was co-sponsored by The University of Oklahoma psychiatry department through a grant from the Oklahoma City National Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism. The main survey has a margin of error of plus or minus 2 percentage points, while the margin of error for the survey in the three cities is plus or minus 4 percentage points.

Meanwhile, a New York Times/CBS News poll found that 60 percent of New York City residents think the threat of a terrorist attack in their city is greater than it is in any other big city.

Barely 40 percent of respondents believe the city is safer than it had been four years ago, a decrease of 20 percent from those polled in August. Even so, nearly two-thirds of those surveyed said that given a choice, they would prefer to be living in the city four years from now than any other place.

The poll, conducted by telephone in English or Spanish June 4 through Sunday, surveyed 940 adults. It has a margin of error of plus or minus three percentage points.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 281-283 next last
To: registereSCvoter
Your first day on FR?
Welcome newbie!
81 posted on 06/11/2002 8:35:04 AM PDT by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
The tendencies of the 'You!'-inclined.
82 posted on 06/11/2002 8:36:44 AM PDT by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
You are so full of crap...

Hey! You took me out of context, I meant to say you so full of crap.

83 posted on 06/11/2002 8:37:35 AM PDT by mconder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
Perhaps you should consider the context of a person's post rather than using only a portion. By your latest action it's quite obvious you're the child who sulked.

***To: Wyatt's Torch

**most women are far more concerned with safety and security (for their families) than are men. **

What an insane comment. If women are more concerned about their families than men....then we have a real problem...with the men.

47 posted on 6/11/02 7:47 AM Pacific by homeschool mama

84 posted on 06/11/2002 8:38:53 AM PDT by homeschool mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: The Mayor
Sunny Acres Senior Citizens Retirement Home.
85 posted on 06/11/2002 8:39:27 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mconder
I meant to say you so full of crap.

Ebonics?

86 posted on 06/11/2002 8:39:48 AM PDT by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
"Liberty is irrelevant to a corpse."

Now where have I heard this before.....oh, yes - Better Red Than Dead.

Your statement is a weird mirror-image of the battle cry of the unilateral disarmament movement of the 70s and 80s. Just like you, they presented us with a false dilemna - We better do (fill in the blank) or we're all dead! And it is no less repellent coming from the right, than it was coming from the left. Sorry, but as someone who can remember the Cuban Missile Crisis, I've heard this tune my entire life, and I'm not impressed.

This police action is no more a "war" than the current "war" on drugs. BTW, how is the WOD going, anyhow? Any end in sight? Expect the same with your WOT.

87 posted on 06/11/2002 8:40:54 AM PDT by Who is George Salt?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
"Ebonics?"

Quote of the week?

88 posted on 06/11/2002 8:41:26 AM PDT by Stew Padasso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man;joanie-f;harpo11
In Reply 40, FRPR Reagan Man said:
If you aren't a terrorist, wishing to harm America and kill American's, you've got nothing to worry about. Go about your life and stop being paranoid and scared of your own shadow.

Would Ronald Reagan make such a statement?

89 posted on 06/11/2002 8:41:28 AM PDT by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: homeschool mama
Perhaps you should consider the context of a person's post rather than using only a portion.

Yeah.
But it's the "portion" that makes them hilarious.


90 posted on 06/11/2002 8:41:47 AM PDT by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
To look at life and people in portions, you must be a short, strange little man.
91 posted on 06/11/2002 8:42:54 AM PDT by homeschool mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
It really is quite revealing how you and your little friends play.
92 posted on 06/11/2002 8:43:23 AM PDT by homeschool mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
If we are at war, then why don't we put up our first line of defense and close the borders. We aren't at war, all we are doing is allowing our government to dominate and control our lives.
93 posted on 06/11/2002 8:43:59 AM PDT by gunshy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: gunshy
Good point.
94 posted on 06/11/2002 8:46:58 AM PDT by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
But anyone who would give the GOVERNMENT more power of their lives in the misplaced hope that somehow it would make them safer is sadly mistaken. YOU are ultimately responsible for your own safety. Why should I, a white male born in Tennessee or 80 year old ladies in wheelchairs, give up ANY freedoms at all for what male, Arabic, Muslim terrorists between the ages of 17 and 40 do all over the world?

There is a simple solution to infinitely increasing the security of this country that the politicians absolutely REFUSE to do. Simply round up ALL Muslims that have entered into this country illegally, carefully screen all others and deport anyone even remotely suspicious, and greatly restrict the people coming from Muslim countries.

95 posted on 06/11/2002 8:48:19 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
If America is at war, what is being done to protect americans: 1. Closing our borders 2. Restricting immigration 3. Rounding up and deporting of all illegal immigrants 4. Developing civilian defense procedures 5. None of the above
96 posted on 06/11/2002 8:48:24 AM PDT by gunshy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: gunshy
All of the above?
97 posted on 06/11/2002 8:50:32 AM PDT by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: registereSCvoter
My government isn't known for their honesty. I do NOT trust THEM!

One of the fundamental problems is that the government has a very poor track record of punishing its people when they abuse their authority.

98 posted on 06/11/2002 8:51:58 AM PDT by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: poet
So, let's enforce the laws. How is that done? If you can't legislate a change of heart, how do you enforce what some have obviously chosen to ignore?
99 posted on 06/11/2002 8:52:18 AM PDT by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
Yep.
100 posted on 06/11/2002 8:53:51 AM PDT by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 281-283 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson