Skip to comments.
BUSH DISMISSES ADMINISTRATION REPORT ON 'WARMING'
Drudge ^
| Drudge
Posted on 06/04/2002 10:06:01 AM PDT by CoolGuyVic
"'I read the report put out by the bureaucracy,' Bush said dismissivly... "
More to come, I'm sure
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: drudge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480, 481-500, 501-520 ... 1,061 next last
Comment #481 Removed by Moderator
To: PhiKapMom
>>I WILL SHOUT IT OUT -- I DON'T LIKE WHAT LIMBAUGH HAS TURNED INTO -- HE IS NO FRIEND OF THIS ADMINISTRATION AND THE REPUBLICAN PARTY -- END OF SHOUT!!!!! <<
Agreed. Dissent is not to be tolerated. NEVER question authority.
To: Howlin
Sorry 'bout that Howlin, I conjured images of that guy in the Holiday Inn commercials, but apparently I have assumed wrong.
To: PhiKapMom
Amen to that
484
posted on
06/04/2002 12:13:01 PM PDT
by
MJY1288
To: Nick Danger
Nick your take on this when it was breaking news on Drudge was solid and sound. Great Job!
Let me extend my apologies to the President for my critical remarks on this topic. Let me also apologize to any Freeper for any unkind remarks that I might have made concerning their thoughts or beliefs on this report or the discussion that surrounded it.
To: PhiKapMom
Get with it! I am a Republican and I just gave up my "Conservative" label because of folks like you. Not one for core values, are you. What will you give up tomarrow?
To: CoolGuyVic
Of COURSE HE DID BECAUSE ALL THAT IT IS IS A GREAT LOAD OF LEFTIST,ENVIRO-WACKO PROPOGANDA BASED ON PC JUNK-SCIENCE!!!!!
To: Grampa Dave
Gramps, you have more power than I do! Hats off to you.
Ordinarlily I like Lee Rodgers (Melanie I like more), but every once in awhile he gets this bilious tone in his voice and starts firing off shots about things he doesn't have a clue about. It's on those times that I change the channel. Rodgers needs to realize that some of us conservatives just aren't as mean-spirited or as "all-knowing" as he is...This morning, I preferred continued rants of Kings fans on KHTK in Sacramento about the officiating in the series with the Lakers to more Bush bashing on KSFO.
To: aristeides
Do you have a link to the EPA site? I looked and could not find the article.
489
posted on
06/04/2002 12:14:57 PM PDT
by
cinFLA
To: Wild Irish Rogue
Wow......that is deserving of a thread in itself. We need to ping all the Bush haters to this thread.
To: Joe Hadenuf
I agree with you -- it is a conspiracy against Bush -- too much of this crap has come out at the same time to not be one.
Senate races are tight and limbaugh is not helping at all with his sniping and bashing! That's one reason I just want to be referred to as a Republican -- the bashing I am seeing by conservatives on here and on talk radio has showed me the light! I am for a lot of conservative issues but I will not blindly follow radio talk show hosts against a man I consider to be honorable and am Proud to call My President -- George W. Bush!
To: KC_Conspirator
:-)
492
posted on
06/04/2002 12:18:36 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: willgetsome
I remember a book from my college days about presidential authority. The author made the comment that whenever a President makes a decision or asks a department for something, the decision makes it to about the third level of bureaucracy, and then it usually hits a career bureaucrat and gets stymied there. This kind of struggle between a President and the careerists in every department is a constant one, and effects every President.
To: rwfromkansas
"They're here." :-)
494
posted on
06/04/2002 12:19:26 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Tuor
I *quoted from the report itself*.Yes, and you interpreted it incorrectly. You jumped to conclusions. Now I direct you to #451. Is this a religious thing with you or will enough evidence convince you?
To: texlok
Be sure to read #471!
This report has been a long time in development and released only to meet legal requirements...Lets wait and see who takes the fall...for the content and it's review or lack of review!
Do only I smell a "RAT"?
496
posted on
06/04/2002 12:20:19 PM PDT
by
3D-JOY
To: SerpentDove
Where did I say dissent was never tolerated? You guys sound like RATS -- parse every word! I said I didn't like Limbaugh and he was no help to Republicans in Senate races! He can whine and bash all he wants and I cannot listen to him all I want! You see I have an off button on my radio and if I don't like something -- I turn it off! Limbaugh is permanently off my radio! I also said I don't vote for RATS! I even offered to debate the person! Is that stifling dissent -- no -- I just don't have to listen to what I don't want to -- last time I check it was a Free Country!
To: concerned about politics
What are YOU willing to lose tomorrow in the name of "principle"? The House and the Senate? The White House? Will you allow Hillary, or John Edwards, or Gore, or Lieberman, or Gephardt to pick the Supreme Court justices?
What are YOU willing to give up?
498
posted on
06/04/2002 12:20:51 PM PDT
by
hchutch
To: SerpentDove
Agreed. Dissent is not to be tolerated. NEVER question authority.Yeah, especially the New York Times.
To: marajade
Whitman tried to delay its release as long as she could and then finally felt she had to comply with the law and so it was released. If that is true, then I wonder why the Administration didn't prepare the ground, as it were, for the report. That would've done a lot to defuse what is now happening, though it couldn't have been defused completely without a flat-out denial of the accuracy of the report.
Tuor
500
posted on
06/04/2002 12:22:03 PM PDT
by
Tuor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480, 481-500, 501-520 ... 1,061 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson