Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Students Hooked on 'Ebonics' Are Being Groomed for Failure
INSIGHT magazine ^ | June 3, 2002 | Nicholas Stix

Posted on 06/04/2002 9:16:59 AM PDT by Stand Watch Listen

Remember "ebonics?" In December 1996 a national debate erupted about the Oakland, Calif., school-board decision authorizing teachers to use street slang while teaching children standard English. For the last six years, with the connivance of the mainstream media, most Americans have been able to forget ebonics. Unfortunately, however, this foolishness has continued.

Linguistics professors Walt Wolfram and Erik Thomas defend ebonics as the legitimate dialect of a dynamic minority in their new book, The Development of African-American English. New York state regent Adelaide Sanford recently insisted that her support of ebonics had been "misrepresented" and that ebonics is the language of great black poets of the past, such as James Weldon Johnson. In 2001, the Linguistics Society of America (LSA) reiterated its 1997 statement supporting ebonics. And, in 1998, academics Lisa Delpit and Theresa Perry edited an anthology, The Real Ebonics Debate, in which none of the approximately 30 contributions dared to criticize the newly accepted dialect.

"Experts" tell us that ebonics is three things: 1) an African language that is genetically passed on among blacks; 2) a vocabulary that has grown out of the encounter of African slaves with Irish immigrants; and 3) a wholly new dialect created since the 1960s by young blacks to separate themselves from whites.

You might expect someone to have pointed out that the above definitions are mutually incompatible. But no such luck. Despite having a professional interest in rigorous, scholarly debate, most linguistics professors long ago abandoned any pretenses to objectivity. The most common — and correct — understanding by blacks and whites alike is that ebonics is broken English and/or street slang. However, any educator so defining ebonics is sure to be shouted down, or worse. As a result, those who know better have remained silent — as one well-meaning academic once advised me to do.

Although ebonics supporters such as Keith Gilyard publicly have claimed otherwise, children taught using ebonics readers did worse than their peers who were taught with standard English readers. Consider this from an ebonics reader used by professors John and Angela Rickford:

"This here little Sister name Mae was most definitely untogether. I mean, like she didn't act together. She didn't look together. She was just an untogether Sister.

"Her teacher was always sounding on her 'bout daydreaming in class. I mean, like, just 'bout every day the teacher would be getting on her case. But it didn't seem to bother her none. She just kept on keeping on. Like, I guess daydreaming was her groove. And you know what they say: 'Don't knock your Sister's groove.' But a whole lotta people did knock it. But like I say, she just kept on keeping on.

"One day Mae was taking [sic] to herself in the lunch room. She was having this righteous old conversation with herself. She say, 'I wanna be a princess with long golden hair.' Now can you get ready for that? Long golden hair!

"Well, anyway, Mae say, 'If I can't be a princess I'll settle for some long golden hair. If I could just have me some long golden hair everything would be all right with me. Lord, if I could just have me some long golden hair.'"

Ebonics is a pillar of Afrocentrism. It is a movement which, using intimidation, violence and pseudoscholarship, has dumbed down the education of black children beyond recognition, illegally barred whites from teaching black children and deliberately cut poor, black children off from the mainstream of American life.

Afrocentrists maintain that the pigment melanin makes blacks intellectually, morally and culturally superior to whites. They teach black children that ancient black Egyptians flew gliders, that whites who dispute such fairy tales are racists who seek to deny black greatness and that all black educational failure is due to a racist, white conspiracy.

Afrocentrists such as George Washington University professor Robert Williams, who coined the term "ebonics" in 1973, maintain that it is an act of disrespect for a white teacher to correct a black child. Professor Charles Coleman of the City University of New York's (CUNY's) York College has argued that remedial education is harmful to black students.

Progressive white educators who support Afrocentrists insist that it is wrong to correct students' usage and grammar. Unfortunately, this approach leads teachers to give passing grades on writing-proficiency exams. The CUNY remedial students then are permitted to take college-level classes despite possessing only semiliterate reading abilities.

Many middle-class blacks like to sometimes "go ghetto" and use street slang. But these professionals can speak standard English — in many cases, better than I can — and can always go home. The poor and working-class blacks to whom Afrocentric educators have refused to teach standard English, however, have nowhere to go.

Nicholas Stix writes frequently on education issues and has been an instructor in the City University of New York.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: academialist; afrocentricity; educationnews; freetrade; geopolitics; govwatch; nwo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-172 next last
To: finnman69
Ebonics is like perpetual literal welfare.

Wow. Can we make a bumper sticker out of that? I love it!

121 posted on 06/04/2002 2:32:01 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Hooooly crap, that's just about the funniest thing EVER!
122 posted on 06/04/2002 2:36:57 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
"Experts" tell us that ebonics is three things: 1) an African language that is genetically passed on among blacks;

And where on the chromosome bees that gene?

Vague recollections of Psych 1. But, to the best of my memory:

Frederick the Great wanted to find out what the "natural" language of humans was - French or German,
or heaven forbid, English. Had a couple of babies isolated from all language, going so far as to remove
the tongues from the nannies. Years pass...

Naturally, ole' Fred got what he didn't expect: Ebonics, I mean gibberish.

More nuture than nature, I surmise.

123 posted on 06/04/2002 2:38:17 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Well, hey.

That's what affirmative Action is for..

124 posted on 06/04/2002 2:41:20 PM PDT by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
IIRC, this started out as an attempt to get more "non-english speaking" federal $$$ for Oakland. Now, it
appears that they want federal tax dollars to fund yet another totally useless "industry".
125 posted on 06/04/2002 2:45:37 PM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex con
I think you're being a captious little blowhard who's picking a fight because he's got nothing more exciting in his life. Grow up. I'm making light conversation and you're challenging me to a duel. I just don't care enough to entertain you.
126 posted on 06/04/2002 2:48:57 PM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

Comment #127 Removed by Moderator

To: Political Junkie Too
Maybe I missed the "y'all" and the "fixin' to" in the Federalist Papers, but then I haven't read them word for word.
128 posted on 06/04/2002 2:51:58 PM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

Comment #129 Removed by Moderator

To: Stand Watch Listen
Why can't the "Miss Ebonics" pageant get participants from all 50 states? It seems they have a problem wearing the banner "Idaho".
130 posted on 06/04/2002 2:59:27 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: George Frm Br00klyn Park
In Ireland, it was a crime for the irish to have or read books.

The English tried to destroy the Welsh language in a similar fashion. The Welsh struck back. They took the 1588 translation of the Holy Bible and taught their children to read and write Welsh. They only had a single day off each week, so this teaching occurred in "SUNDAY SCHOOL". Preservation of the language and religious instruction were combined to meet the objective.

131 posted on 06/04/2002 3:15:40 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Eva
The only thing that ebonics prepares a kid for is a career in rap music.

Oh, heaven forfend!

I'm so sick of listening to the boom cars around here broadcasting rap wheresoever you go at about 120 db. Noise pollution of the worst sort.

And now McDonald's ads (at least around Atlanta) are in rap. That kills my appetite for anything with Mack on it.

132 posted on 06/04/2002 3:16:08 PM PDT by Ole Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: maxwell
I stand proud of my language skills AND my barbecue, (said with my Texas accent).
133 posted on 06/04/2002 3:18:17 PM PDT by Texan5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
They not be gettin' good jobs when they be graduatin'.

Yeah they be gettin them jobs. Yo forgit 'bout qotas an afirmitiv acton!

134 posted on 06/04/2002 3:24:09 PM PDT by FormerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CatoRenasci
Your point about the lack of competence of the teachers is well taken. Although most of us can recall teachers who stood out as excellent, inspiring, and even mentors, most teachers are not recruited from the most talented students in our most competitive colleges and universities.

I still think more of us should stop complaining about the schools and get into the schools. There's a teacher shortage right now, and it's becoming easier to get certified (at least in Georgia) if one already has a college degree.

The pay and working conditions don't equal those in many more "prestigious" careers, but if all the good students choose other jobs, only the second-rate students are left to teach.

Although society pays lip service to education, and it is essential to success...

Society says education is important, but at the same time denigrates teachers.....

135 posted on 06/04/2002 3:47:54 PM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
>>Now can you get ready for that? <<

Clearly, that is supposed to read, "Now can yall get ready for dat?"

Must be a typo.

136 posted on 06/04/2002 3:52:15 PM PDT by SerpentDove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex con; tdadams
ex con is correct.
137 posted on 06/04/2002 4:01:37 PM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

Comment #138 Removed by Moderator

To: Amelia
You make good points, but historically, in the US, teaching has always been an occupation strangely regarded. Important, given all of the Puritan and other colonists early emphasis on education, but not terribly prestigious. The reasons for this are many, in part because of the traditional English suspicion of things intellectual - smelling of the lamp is the old saw, in part because it was seen as something a young man (or young woman later) without independent means could do at the outset of his career after his own schooling. By the mid-19th century, while every town sought to establish common public schools, the school and its master/marm were paid only with what locally was raised in taxes or fees, often not much. Hence the field often did not attract the sort of teachers calculated to raise the prestige of the job. The only teachers in America who ever had social prestige were university professors up through the 1950s. Many of them were younger sons of the upper class, with some independent means, hence the low pay was no deterent, and their class standing did not depend on their positions, rather their status enhanced the status of the position. That changed again in the 1950s - 1970's as the influx of boomers saw the hiring of many who got their credentials on the GI Bill from WWII, men and women who didn't fit the mold and who were careerists.
139 posted on 06/04/2002 4:21:19 PM PDT by CatoRenasci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Spoken like a true deconstructionist.
140 posted on 06/04/2002 4:26:07 PM PDT by ffrancone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-172 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson