Posted on 06/03/2002 10:04:46 AM PDT by hchutch
Just the headline
(PS: no money is being spent on unmarrieds marrying. Unmarrieds on welfare will be encouraged to marry.) The rest of your list is usual Third Party crapola.
I agree, although I'm still concerned that this report has acknowledged human actions cause global warming. It would appear the 10 years of study will be centered around what to do about it as opposed to whether it exists in the first place. Am I wrong?
Are you going to tell me what I am? Libertarians can be liberal-libertarians or conservative-libertarians. I happen to be a conservative-libertarian, or a strict Constitutionalist. I find my views align consistently with those of people like Walter Williams, Thomas Sowell, Ward Connerly, Charlie Reece, and the like. It is true, I am not a Republican, but don't tell me I'm not a conservative!
I neither said, nor implied that. Rush has every right to say whatever he wants, no matter how dumb, which is obviously what has decided to do.
Criticizing the President and his policies is perfectly fine. Saying he is the same as algore is stupid. Rush has lost it, and his audience is shrinking by the day now. He's free to say whatever he wants, but this is a capitalistic country, my friend. If consumers don't like what he has to say, they won't listen, and he'll lose profits.
If he's smart, he'll stop what he's doing, because we 'consumers' know better than to believe the tripe he's been dishing out lately.
How do you know? Wanna bet?
I only use the money/property argument as one example of Rights being removed. I could give others, and have in several replies on this thread.
Sure, we've burned fossil fuels for a while but we also put out forest fires. The only axe I have to grind here is that the information and recommendations be based on science and not ideology. If there's a problem we can deal with it....
or not.:-}
Oh yes. He did "mention " that, didn't he. Wow. (empty words). Clinton even carried a bible! What's the diff? Clinton refered to his God many times.
Keyes is doing more for this issue than Bush, and he's not even an official! Had I understood Keyes in 2000, I just may have voted for him.
We're passing the word around about Bushs anti-Christian deeds, and exposing his false testomies. We do have meetings. Nice of you to ask.
As far as our Church politics, not the other socialist issues Bush seems to adhere to, Bush hired Sodomites. Did he not read the Bible he says he believes in? Does he not know what God has done to them throughout history?
Bush threw money at the pagan public schools that teach the nations children to go ahead, here's your condomn and your fisting kits for the weekend. Remember to pray to mother gaia, your blessed mother earth, before you go out! It's beter he had a millstone tied around his neck!
Does he not know if you give a man a fish, he'll just come back again for more?
Bush "claims" to be a man of God, yet doesn't show it in deeds. Just empty "suggestions."
National policies are another story. I'm sure you've read the long list of give aways already, so I won't bother re-writing the entire sell out list. You can go back and read them for yourself.
I would have a hard time voting for Clinton this year.
Agreed. All the info I've read suggests all we have to go on right now is ideology. There's no sound science on the subject; certainly not enough to suggest we should base political/economic decisions on it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.