Posted on 06/03/2002 10:04:46 AM PDT by hchutch
Just the headline
That's a great one. You guys are priceless!
You seem to be living a little further in the future than the rest of us are.
Sure. It was his genious plan. His great wisdom. His check mate.
He simply caved. Period. He wants the poll numbers. That's what he cares about. Nothing more.
Maybe, hopefully my interpretation of the report is overstated.
Our government has declared so many damn WARS, I can't keep track of them all. I know this -- everytime our government declares WAR, the people lose more Rights, property, and liberty, while the government expands its size, power, and reach. The only damn thing I want the government to protect is my Constitutional Rights -- the only thing it's not protecting.
Bush is a LIAR and a SOCIALIST!!
Number one, I can't see your lips. Number two, even if I could I wouldn't be lookin at them. And number three, the only thing spilling over your lips is conjecture and spittle flavored with kimshi toothpaste.
DO YOU HONESTLY BELIEVE THAT WE ARE BEING PROTECTED AND DEFENDED BY OUR BENEVOLENT FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES TODAY?? i sure don't!
All one needs to do is take a good look at Bush's stance on the (either already signed by him into law, or pending) education bill....farm bill....partiot act....homeland security....campaign finance reform....immigration.... federalization of airport security....healthcare entitlements....Hardly anything contained in any of them that promotes government the likes of which the founders envisioned. And lots of big-government spending and regulating which will result in increased federal power over the states and individual citizens, the greatest increase in federal government spending in history, and more incremental loss of God-given, constitutionally-insured liberties for all of us.
BINGO !! No one could explain that any better. Great job!
Christine, are you aware that 25% of the Clinton holdovers at the FBI have been crapcanned?
If he tells israel to "get out" and does not mean it, he is a less than honest.
If he authorizes a report that he knows to be false and misleading to the UN... he once again is less than honest.
If he says "we will make no distinction" and then does... he is being less than honest.
If he invites the "terrorist sponsoring nations to dinner at crawford" after saying "no distinctions..." once again, he is less than honest.
At some point, folks of varying moral stature will come to agreement, that son of "read my lips" has inherited the same "ignore my lips" syndrome.
You support it if YOU want to, but in my view
...folks who do so are supporting the unsupportable... at our own very great risk. I had hoped we were done for good with the "I did not have sex" type of dishonesty in our white house. I see I was wrong.
My pointing out dishonesty and inconsistancy does not make ME a liar. And your calling me one for doing so is not right.
All that because I wouldn't read your lips? You got a complaint, take it to the management.
Good response!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.