If he tells israel to "get out" and does not mean it, he is a less than honest.
If he authorizes a report that he knows to be false and misleading to the UN... he once again is less than honest.
If he says "we will make no distinction" and then does... he is being less than honest.
If he invites the "terrorist sponsoring nations to dinner at crawford" after saying "no distinctions..." once again, he is less than honest.
At some point, folks of varying moral stature will come to agreement, that son of "read my lips" has inherited the same "ignore my lips" syndrome.
You support it if YOU want to, but in my view
...folks who do so are supporting the unsupportable... at our own very great risk. I had hoped we were done for good with the "I did not have sex" type of dishonesty in our white house. I see I was wrong.
My pointing out dishonesty and inconsistancy does not make ME a liar. And your calling me one for doing so is not right.
Looks like you're the dishonest one...as if we didn't know.
I'm sure that Bush would rather be attacked by political midgets like you for his "dishonesty", than have the CFR around to do its damage. Mitch McConnell and the rest of the team that will be taking CFR to the Supremes, are happy as clams that Bush signed it. Now they can make sure it dies.
You seem to be one of those "principled" conservatives who trash Bush when he beats the Left at their own game. Campaign finance a big issue for you? Yeah, sure it is.
"Woe indeed."