Skip to comments.
Ice Ocean on Mars: What's Next?
Fox News ^
| May 30, 2002
| Rand Simberg
Posted on 05/30/2002 10:59:33 AM PDT by NonZeroSum
Edited on 04/22/2004 12:33:39 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
We've got the ice
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: colonization; exploration; ice; mars; space; water
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 last
To: All
On NOW at RadioFR!
6pm PDT/9pm EDT- Listen to Radio FreeRepublic live tonight, as Luis Gonzales interviews G. Edward Griffin and discusses his book 'The Creature From Jekyll Island. A Second Look At The Federal Reserve'. Find out the true nature of our monetary system and how it affects you!
Click HERE to listen LIVE while you FReep!
41
posted on
05/30/2002 6:01:27 PM PDT
by
Bob J
Comment #42 Removed by Moderator
Comment #43 Removed by Moderator
Comment #44 Removed by Moderator
To: Brett66
You don't need Saturn Vs to get to Mars. Small space transports, operating often (for e.g., tourism) can deliver everything that a Mars mission needs, and at affordable costs.
To: NonZeroSum
Leveraging off of a space tourism transport infrastructure would be a great way to do it, but I suspect NASA has no such plans. If the president were to announce a goal of reaching Mars within a decade, I think NASA would do the old Apollo routine. If they were really innovative, they would build reusable VASIMR rockets for routine,fast transport to Mars. I don't think I'm ready to credit NASA for innovative thinking like that though. They'll choose whatever method congress or the president tells them and it will be a fiscal disaster.
46
posted on
05/30/2002 7:17:06 PM PDT
by
Brett66
To: Brett66
We could title it "Boondoggle-the next degeneration" :)
47
posted on
05/30/2002 7:19:48 PM PDT
by
Brett66
To: Brett66
If we can get a space tourism industry going, they'll have little choice.
To: NonZeroSum
Yes and I believe that's the only way we will be going to Mars, if we have a healthy space industry then going to Mars will be a natural extension of our capabilities. If NASA tries to rush there, it will be a horribly expensive failure. Even Zubrin's "Mars Direct" scheme could easily turn into a + 200 billion boondoggle. I just hope some of the infrastructure leveraging ideas like yours are given a fair hearing. If NASA is given such a mandate, they have a tremendous opportunity or they could set back the development of space industry 30 years (again).
49
posted on
05/30/2002 7:34:58 PM PDT
by
Brett66
To: Brett66
I think that was the point of the Fox News piece.
To: NonZeroSum
Ice Ocean on Mars: What's Next?
A snocone machine and lots of lime syrup
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson