Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Libertarianism Lives
The Wall Street Journal ^ | Tuesday, May 28, 2002 | EDWARD H. CRANE and ROGER PILON

Posted on 05/28/2002 7:39:35 AM PDT by TroutStalker

Edited on 04/22/2004 11:46:33 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Political fashions come and go, but political principles endure. President Clinton noted some six years ago that the era of big government was over. Yet today, conservatives who should know better see a new fashion. George Will, high on his Hamiltonian horse in the Washington Post last month, seemed delighted that minimal-government conservatism was dead. And on these pages recently, Francis Fukuyama declared1 the libertarianism that followed the Thatcher-Reagan revolution to be in retreat. We're all Keynesians now, apparently.


(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: libertarianism; libertarians
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-182 next last
To: KC Burke
Don't get me wrong. I'll take CATO any day of the week over 99% of the gangs out there. Such as the republicans.:)

Its one thing to argue ideology -- after all, everyone has utopian ideals of the perfect political balance -- which then serves as the guide point on the horizon. Every thoughtful individual in this group has such a "point".

While I might really want 75% reduction in government, I’ll settle for the politician who knocks us down 4% over one who grows it 4%. Still, ideally I'd like 75% and will continue to argue for it.

The problem is that the republicans claim victory with the +4%. Call us picky (or extremists!) but are we asking too much by calling this what it really is – a loss? Compromise is one thing, but caving in and calling it victory is pretty weak.

141 posted on 06/04/2002 7:47:07 AM PDT by pghliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: pghliberty
Freedom comes in all shapes and sizes. I happen to be a conservative Christian libertarian. I figure if my God gives me a choice on whether I want to walk with him, my fellow man should be at least as gracious.

What I may frown on for moral or religious reasons does not give me carte blanche to form a cartel of like minded individuals to force our collective will on others.

Great statement. It sums up my beliefs to a tee.

142 posted on 06/04/2002 7:49:55 AM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: KC Burke, pghliberty
Cato is a public policy think tank who's object is to promote civil society. They are proposing real life solutions to societal problems. (mostly caused by flawed government policy) One example is that although you can be sure that they think the best possible solution to the mess of "social security" would be no system at all, they propose a privatized system with some government involvement.

They aren't an ideological organisation per se.

The best organisation I have ever belonged to is the Cato Institute.

143 posted on 06/04/2002 8:00:37 AM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: pghliberty
I was referring to where you said that the LP is "...philosophy based rather than a team." In my opinion, this is what is wrong with the LP, not what is right. If you are a member of a philosophy club, why should you admit those people who do not share your beliefs?

This is why I say the LP is extremist. The objectivists and anarchists set the terms of the debate, write the platform, etc. While it is interesting for a philosophy club to discuss theory of eliminating government, the goal of a political party is to elect candidates to public office. The LP to date has been less than successful at this, and my point is that this is because the LP considers itself a "political philosophy" rather than a party.

144 posted on 06/04/2002 8:00:55 AM PDT by Liberal Classic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: ThomasJefferson
``I see you have introduced your hatred for the LP and the attendant generalizations and mischaracterizations into yet another thread where the LP is not the topic. You remind me of Kevvie boy on the drug issue.''

Um, the LP is off topic for this thread?

Listen TJ, how about bringing up counterpoints to my arguments instead of hurling insults.

145 posted on 06/04/2002 8:02:53 AM PDT by Liberal Classic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: pghliberty
Re: post #141, brilliant statement. Great post.

Who the hell are you anyway? :-)

146 posted on 06/04/2002 8:02:59 AM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Liberal Classic
Um, the LP is off topic for this thread?

Yes, initially. Unfortunately the usual suspects turned it from Cato to the LP and drugs. You then couldn't contain yourself from aiding them and letting them change the subject to your mutual enemy, the LP.

And you are pretty picky about insults after you insult every member of the LP every chance you get by making broad brush generalizations to further your vendetta.

147 posted on 06/04/2002 8:08:07 AM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Liberal Classic
Indeed you frame the dilemma well. The precise problem is that politics demands caving in to the status-quo, which cuts to the quick. This is why I believe large-scale lib change, if ever, will likely not come from the party. The LP does have a place of keeping the other two parties somewhat honest.
148 posted on 06/04/2002 8:11:50 AM PDT by pghliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: rebelsoldier
To exercise political power you must gain political office

I disagree with this assessment. The Socialist Party of the thirties was one of the most sucessful parties of all time, and they never elected anyone of consequence. They saw almost all of their (terrible) agenda enacted.

149 posted on 06/04/2002 8:13:50 AM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: ThomasJefferson
I am under the impression this is a thread about the viability of libertarianism in general, relative to CATOs opinion.
150 posted on 06/04/2002 8:14:05 AM PDT by pghliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Liberal Classic
>>>... the Depts. of Education and Housing and Urban Development are two of the most bloated and worthless agencies.

I couldn't agree with you more. I'd really like to see the Ed-dept bite the dust, followed by HUD close behind. And if must continue to fund an energy dept and EPA, at least merge them and cut their combined budget by 25%.

I knew Bush would increase education funding, I just wish he'd let all the money distribute down to the local community level. Back where it belongs! As of now, the ED dept budget has doubled since 1996.

151 posted on 06/04/2002 8:27:04 AM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: pghliberty;ThomasJefferson
Thank you for not flaming. ;)

ThomasJefferson's comments not withstanding, I do not hate libertarians. I would like the LP to see more candidate hold office, than the occasional state representative. However, I see the LP making the same mistakes over and over again, yet expecting different results. The LP makes this same argument against the prohibition, and rightly so. However, when I make this argument about the LP itself, people get defensive and indignant, like TJ just did.

152 posted on 06/04/2002 8:28:24 AM PDT by Liberal Classic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: ThomasJefferson
The article is from the Cato Institute, not the LP. Try to keep up for a change.

And your point?

The last time I looked, The CATO Institute was still promoting the libertarian philosophy, while being an arm of the Libertarian Party. Can't deny the truth TJ.

153 posted on 06/04/2002 8:31:16 AM PDT by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: ThomasJefferson
which ties in directly to my point about change being cultural vs. political. BTW, I've posted some info about me on my freep ID page.
154 posted on 06/04/2002 8:33:23 AM PDT by pghliberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
I think we're in agreement there.

I do think George W. Bush is a lot better than Gore. It's just that Clinton set such a low bar, that anyone looks good in comparison.

Personally, I have mixed feelings about W. I am 100% behind sending terrorists to Allah, and got warm fuzzies from Ashcroft's support of an individual 2nd amendment right, and Bush's rejection of the ICC. On the other hand, I can't ignore the education spending increase, recent reversal on global warming, etc. Sometimes I get the sense he's pulling a Clinton by lifting his finger in the air to see which way the wind's blowing.

155 posted on 06/04/2002 8:37:18 AM PDT by Liberal Classic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: ThomasJefferson
Thanks for the insight. You mention:
They are proposing real life solutions to societal problems. (mostly caused by flawed government policy)...

For that, they deserve a lot of credit from all non-leftists.

156 posted on 06/04/2002 8:38:25 AM PDT by KC Burke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: pghliberty, Liberal Classic
I am under the impression this is a thread about the viability of libertarianism in general, relative to CATOs opinion.

Seems like a correct impression. There is however, what I would title, "Thread creep" on every topic. The problem for me arises when people with an agenda about drugs, the LP, etc. change the topic immediately to their own pets.

Some of those people are the obvious ones who simply hate the idea of self-government, but the far more dangerous are those who appear to be friends of freedom but play right into the hands the enemies of same.

You and Liberal Classic seem to agree with each other about the LP generally, but you make your case without "mischaracterization by generality".

I happen to share most of your criticisms of how the party operates BTW. I just don't try to figuratively assassinate the whole political arm of the movement because I don't agree with the strategy currently employed. If I allow Liberal Classic to get me to engage in a debate about the LP, it will take away from the real topic of this thread, namely the huge postive contributions to liberty made by the Cato Institute.

157 posted on 06/04/2002 9:08:16 AM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: pghliberty
BTW, I've posted some info about me on my freep ID page.

Thanks for updating your page, I peeked at it before and it seemed devoid of interesting info. We seem to share many views. Regards

158 posted on 06/04/2002 9:12:42 AM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Liberal Classic
However, when I make this argument about the LP itself, people get defensive and indignant, like TJ just did.

I'm sure you realize that your criticism of the LP is not why I became indignant. It is something far different and it stretches back to a thread last week. You have made charges and generalizations that would make our enemies proud. Even up to describing the party with the "A" word. A word so politically charged it is used as the first shot by opponents of freedom whenever possible. I find it repugnant that anyone who claims to be a friend of liberty would say such things. I attribute it to old personal vendettas against people in the party. Which may be incorrect, but an understandable speculation I think.

159 posted on 06/04/2002 9:27:00 AM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Can't deny the truth TJ.

You can't recognise the truth.

160 posted on 06/04/2002 9:30:04 AM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-182 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson