Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA To Head For Mars After Water Is Found Everywhere
Independent (UK) ^ | 5-27-2002 | Rupert Cornwell

Posted on 05/27/2002 4:23:27 PM PDT by blam

Nasa to head for Mars after water is found everywhere

By Rupert Cornwell, in Washington
27 May 2002

NASA IS poised to announce its firmest plans yet to send men to Mars within 20 years, following the stunning discovery of huge quantities of water-ice close to the planet's surface.

The presence of frozen water is the main finding sent to Earth by the joint US-Russian Odyssey spacecraft, which entered Martian orbit in October 2001. In a paper for the journal Science, two scientists in Los Alamos involved with the mission will present evidence that ice lies about a metre beneath the surface over a large area.

There were "features that suggest water, or something like water, everywhere," Bob Reedy, one of the authors, told the Albuquerque Journal last week. "Yet today there's no water on the surface. Where did all that water go?"

This week Jim Garvin, the head of the US space agency's Mars exploration programme is expected to announce that, on the basis of the existence of accessible water on the planet, his agency is aiming to make a manned landing there within the next 20 years.

The lack of water has long been a huge obstacle to men carrying out the nine-month, 40-million-mile journey to Mars. But confirmation of the buried icepacks could solve the problem – as well as rekindle the debate about whether life existed there.

The discovery of water was made by gamma-ray and neutron spectrometers which measure gamma-ray emanations and other evidence of the presence of hydrogen. Scientists believe the hydrogen is locked inside crystals of ice. The paper submitted by Mr Reedy and his colleague Bill Feldman will provide the most detailed map yet of the chemical composition of Mars' surface.

Water would provide not only drinking supplies. The hydrogen inside could be extracted to provide fuel for a spacecraft's return journey.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: found; mars; nasa; water
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: blam
blam....

I highly reccommend, "The Case For Mars", by Robert Zubrin if you have not already read it. He is a former engineer with NASA. With that book I have had a peek at what will most likely happen with man and mars. Being around for the real thing would be nice, just not in the program.

21 posted on 05/27/2002 5:29:51 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet
The Red Planet? Umm, no that's not it! Ahh, Robinson Crusoe on Mars? No dagnabbit! Oh Yeah! Dune! No wait, oh the heck with it.
22 posted on 05/27/2002 6:00:45 PM PDT by Arkie2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: blam
"Scientists believe the hydrogen is locked inside crystals of ice."

yeah, inside the water too! Oxygen too! I love the press!

23 posted on 05/27/2002 6:07:12 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag
That's okay, she still has to get to the ice and process it for oxygen, water, and finally fuel. Give her a fighting chance I say. Send her off with two days worth of air, a couple of pieces of wire, one AA battery, and a VERY small ice pick. :-)

Oh yeah, and drop her off somewhere around the equator since the ice is at the poles.

24 posted on 05/27/2002 6:13:32 PM PDT by Have Ruck - Will Travel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ZOOKER
"Anyone want to comment on the Pathfinder mission? Did they forget to look for water when we had a probe on the surface?"

As I recall, Pathfinder was one of three missions launched to Mars at about the same time. The other two crashed. One of the ones that crashed was designed to search for water.

25 posted on 05/27/2002 6:17:01 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: blam
>>The discovery of water was made by gamma-ray and neutron spectrometers which measure gamma-ray emanations and other evidence of the presence of hydrogen. Scientists believe the hydrogen is locked inside crystals of ice. The paper submitted by Mr Reedy and his colleague Bill Feldman will provide the most detailed map yet of the chemical composition of Mars' surface.

Yeah? What if all that hydrogen is in hydrogen sulfide instead of water? Not only would the astronauts have no way to get back, but they'd be doomed to spend the rest of their lives on a planet that smells like a giant fart.

27 posted on 05/27/2002 6:38:25 PM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet
"True Lies?"
28 posted on 05/27/2002 6:38:45 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: blam
Dang! I may not make it 20 more years...and I really did want to see a Mars landing.

Me,too! I even joined the Planetary Society so I could make sure I got to sign petitions to encourage Mars and other space exploration.

29 posted on 05/27/2002 6:57:42 PM PDT by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Perhaps someday we will have the technology to turn the atmosphere on Mars into one fit for human life.

We've know how to go about terra-forming Mars for years now. There was a big article about it in Analog several years back that already had all the details working out. I THINK it was written by Stanley Schmidt. Best I can remember,it seems like terra-forming it to the point where it has a liveable atmosphere would take about 200 years. Too long for thee and me,but a mere mili-second in the greater scheme of things. The point is we need to start doing these things now,so they may be close to ready by the time we need them.

30 posted on 05/27/2002 7:01:02 PM PDT by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam
The Independent is playing fast and loose with its headlines. The headline suggests that NASA is definitely going to Mars, following a major discovery of water:

Nasa to head for Mars after water is found everywhere

The body of the article, however, says something very different:

In a paper for the journal Science, two scientists in Los Alamos involved with the mission will present evidence that ice lies about a metre beneath the surface over a large area.

There were "features that suggest water, or something like water, everywhere," Bob Reedy, one of the authors, told the Albuquerque Journal last week. "Yet today there's no water on the surface. Where did all that water go?"

This week Jim Garvin, the head of the US space agency's Mars exploration programme is expected to announce that, on the basis of the existence of accessible water on the planet, his agency is aiming to make a manned landing there within the next 20 years.

Seems to me there are far too many qualifications and "ifs" to merit the rather breathless headline. Two scientists (of hundreds, I'm guessing) who are "involved with the mission" (as opposed to heading it) "will present evidence" that there are "features that suggest water, "or something like water" about a meter below the surface. James Garvin is "expected to announce that, on the basis of accessible water on the planet [in other words, we need definitive proof], his agency is aiming to make a manned landing there within the next 20 years."

This doesn't make me want to book my reservations to the red planet just yet. And anyway, how many bajillion dollars did we spend on that little remote-controlled rover which determined, as best I can recall, that there are many rocks of various sizes and shapes, and varying in color from reddish brown to brownish red, on the surface of Mars?

31 posted on 05/27/2002 7:03:47 PM PDT by southernnorthcarolina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZOOKER
Did they forget to look for water when we had a probe on the surface?

I could easily be wrong,but I THINK the Pathfinder mission was mostly configured for other research,although it did detect what they thought might be the presence of water. In fact,I think what they found this is what is responsible for the configuration of the present mission.

32 posted on 05/27/2002 7:04:39 PM PDT by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: blam
I thought they finally concluded that thing was from Russia, Antarctica or West Philadelphia… not Mars?
33 posted on 05/27/2002 7:09:04 PM PDT by The Magical Mischief Tour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: blam
You know what I remember about the lunar landing?

Right after the "One small step for man, one giant leap for mankind...", lightning struck our TV ariel and blew the sucker up.

I thought God was pissed at us.

Of course, I was seven at the time.

34 posted on 05/27/2002 7:14:47 PM PDT by patton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: The Magical Mischief Tour
Definitely from Mars.
But not entirely clear about the origin of the strange microscopic forms.
Possibly fossilized life. Possibly chemical, crystal processes.
35 posted on 05/27/2002 7:16:28 PM PDT by edwin hubble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: sneakypete
" I even joined the Planetary Society so I could make sure I got to sign petitions to encourage Mars and other space exploration."

Hey, hey. I was a charter member of the Planetary Society. No more though. LOL, once I contributed money to them to build a SETI telescope in South America (Peru, I think), it was one of those "if you donate X, your name will be placed on a placque at the site." So, I guess my name is on a scope somewhere down there, hee, hee. (That was years ago)

36 posted on 05/27/2002 7:19:17 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: blam
They have had a plan since the '70s to hit Mars. With enough political will it could happen in a few years. Get on your elected politicians and let's get going!
37 posted on 05/27/2002 7:19:30 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
So, I think Russian astronauts from Siberia should be contracted out by NASA to do the landing.

Yes, and Russian scientists should be programmed to get them from the launching pad to the landing site. Affirmative action hasn't hit Russia yet.

38 posted on 05/27/2002 7:27:34 PM PDT by jammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam
Breath slower, you will make it, as this is a tremendous discovery and would be a great national mission as even greater discoveries will be made along the way. Without haste, America should proceed full steam ahead to Mars!
39 posted on 05/27/2002 7:33:22 PM PDT by Joe Hadenuf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Those crafty LGM (little green men ) keep moving the water. A century ago, it was in the "canals"; a few decades ago, it was in polar ice caps; now it's hidden under the surface of the planet. Yeah, that's the ticket...
40 posted on 05/27/2002 7:34:59 PM PDT by southernnorthcarolina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson