Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Massacre in America: Vox Day calls for guns against terror
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Monday, May 27, 2002 | Vox Day

Posted on 05/27/2002 12:07:32 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

It is rumored that Jedi Master Mace Windu has the phrase "Bad Dude" engraved on his lightsaber. This is not due to any arcane minutae from deep within the bowels of the Star Wars canon, but because the actor who plays the Jedi, Samuel L. Jackson, is a notoriously Bad individual with significant Oedipal issues. Although I, like many other red-blooded American males, would like to consider myself likewise Bad, I find that I cannot, despite six years in an egregiously violent martial arts dojo and a bench press of 325 pounds.

I cannot, because I spent most of those six years taking regular beatings at the hands of JD, a true Bad Dude who held a brown belt in jujitsu in addition to his black belt in our style. I can still remember my last belt test, when for one brief shining moment, I thought I could take the man. A kick that sent me flying 10 feet backward into a wall – which I struck so hard that it knocked the wind out of me – quickly illustrated the delusional aspects of that notion.

And I'll never forget going out clubbing with JD and some other Dragons, and being confronted by a drunken lout who seemed to take offense at the mere notion of the martial arts. When he demanded to know what use our training would be if he were to pull a gun, JD simply smiled, slid back his jacket to reveal a .40 caliber compact Glock, and explained that while he trusted in his ability to cope with those he could reach with his hands and feet, he felt it was also important to be prepared for those he could not.

Like I said, a Bad Dude. Now, what does this have to do with the situation currently facing America? Well, if even a deadly martial artist will freely admit that he is not capable of defending himself against an armed attack without a weapon, then what hope does the average American have?

None. Absolutely none. We are helpless.

And while I agree with the logic of Joseph Farah's recent argument that suicide bombings are unlikely in America, I am less sure that the next round of al-Qaida attacks will be the sort of shootings executed by the Japanese Red Army, Fatah Tanzim and Hamas Izz a-Din al Kassam. Whereas these groups have simply been trying to kill Jews, al-Qaida seeks to terrorize the most powerful nation on Earth, and mass shootings won't cut it in the country that invented Columbine.

This does not, of course, mean that Americans should not be prepared. Quite the opposite. I also don't expect any more hijacking attempts, since everyone in the world now knows that a hijacking no longer means a brief detour to Cuba, but that doesn't mean we should turn off the metal detectors. Indeed, our president has told us that we must all do our part in this war, and I say that we take him at his word.

Americans must remember We the People are sovereign. We have not only the right, but the responsibility to defend ourselves and our country. Therefore, I am calling for the establishment of an unofficial national holiday, Guns Against Terror Day. And to celebrate it, I have the following three suggestions:

  1. Obtain a firearm, learn how to use it and begin to carry it at all times. Decent people do not find deadly power intoxicating, but sobering instead. This is why exactly zero of the bloodbaths predicted in the 31 states to pass carry laws have ever taken place.

  2. Every commercial airline pilot must ignore the ridiculous announcement by the Transportation Security administration which continues the ban on firearms in the cockpit. If every single pilot in America shows up for work with a nine-millimeter on his belt, are the security bozos really going to shut down the country again? History shows that when faced by mass disobedience, governments always cave.

  3. Teach your kids to shoot. Teach them safety, and to respect the power of a gun. If this war lasts as long as our leaders are telling us it will, they may need those skills someday.

I'm told that America will be under attack soon, so the time to act is now. I think July 4, 2002, would certainly be an appropriate day for We the People to flex our sovereign muscle and take responsibility for defending ourselves.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: ExSoldier
Finally, it has been shown that women have better hand/eye coordination which is the reason they usually make excellent pilots, especially helicopter pilots due to the multiplicity of tasks they must perform simultaneously.

Please explain why the five women in the CWP class I went through, at the range, failed to pass and failed to get their CWP? I watched several of them shoot, and they were awful. One was shooting so high, some of the bullets may have gone over the embankment and into a neighborhood.

21 posted on 05/27/2002 5:58:48 PM PDT by CWRWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CWRWinger
If you'll review the previous paragraphs of that post, you'll see that I qualified my statements with listening to and applying the techniques I impart to each student. Now, this could be a simple case of mental headspace and timing (student brainlock), or it could have been the instructor (not all are created equal) or it could be a lack of motivation on the part of everybody involved, student and instructor alike! But I would submit to you that five is an inadequate sample to prove an assertion that women are incapable of becoming skilled shots...and there are an awful lot of very capable women in this area who would quite rightfully start screaming for your head in a noose if you choose to go there. You're not going there are you?
22 posted on 05/27/2002 10:05:54 PM PDT by ExSoldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2,CincinnatiKid ,jd792 ,dixie sass,chesty puller,antivenom,muggs ,Grendelgrey ,GRRRRR ,p
Thanks john

BuMpS

23 posted on 05/27/2002 10:20:22 PM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier
I also find that when I teach a novice married couple where both have equal (none) familiarity with firearms, the wife turns into the more competent shooter by far almost 85% of the time.

This is usually because the guys are only half listening and thus only half applying the lessons because usually most guys think that by simple virtue of the fact that they are male makes them an expert in three areas: WOMEN, CARS AND GUNS.

Well, my Marine Corps gunsmithing instructor, who served two tours in Vietnam and killed any number of ah... Vietnamese himself in close combat, would beg to differ with you.

He said that women are naturally better shots than men, and that on one patrol he had come up against a unit of Viet Cong women and that it was the most eerie combat experience he had ever had, because with nearly every report of an enemy weapon, a Marine would fall.

His opinion was that women's nervous systems are just basically different, and less prone to agitation and nervous jitter than men's... none of which explains why women still can't match men's scores in the shooting sports, but...

24 posted on 05/28/2002 12:33:36 AM PDT by fire_eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier
RE: Post #22

I never said my observations were a scientific sample. They were observations of the CWP class of 40 which I went through. There were two men which didn't pass either. One had a .22 caliber pistol made at the end of the 19th century and looked like it hadn't been cleaned in the 20th century. His gun was deemed not safe and was disqualified. The other guy I'll characterize as effeminate and obviously had not had enough range time with his new 9mm. It's obvious the women had not had good instruction and range time, either. But to balance the issue, there were probalbly men there who did not have instruction or range time, yet they pasted.

I am all for women learning how to shoot and defend themselves. But from what I have observed, most women don't want anything to do with firearms. Some have told me they would rather be a victim than to have to shoot someone in self defense!

I don't doubt there are women who shoot well. There are some women who can bench press 200 lbs. plus. But they are not the rule. IMO, there are not more good women shooters because they watch too much TV and get 'indoctrinated' into the anti-gun mind set.

In the area of LE, I have read that women 'officers' pull their guns up to nine times as many times as their male counterpart. Is this desirable behavior and response on the part of the women officers?

25 posted on 05/28/2002 3:14:17 AM PDT by CWRWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: CWRWinger
pasted = passed

LOL, need another round of coffee.

26 posted on 05/28/2002 3:19:24 AM PDT by CWRWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ExSoldier; CWRWinger
You two are discussing apples and oranges. One class is composed of people who want to learn how to shoot and shoot well. The Concealed Class is there to teach people the laws and to see if the people there are qualified to carry a concealed weapon. ExSoldier was discussing the abilities of women who made up their minds that they wanted to be good at the shooting sports. CWRWinger is discussing women who are going through a class on the law and sending them out to the range to see if they qualify.

I believe that the big difference of the women who do well in the shooting sports are those that never let the notion that they can't do something stop them. So why should they get rattled when something goes wrong? They already have the mindset that they are going to succeed at what they are doing.

27 posted on 05/28/2002 7:02:54 AM PDT by Shooter 2.5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: petuniasevan
If we give up and say, "Our hands are tied,"

Our government already has. Witness last week when the statement came out that there was nothing they could do to stop terrorist attacks on U.S. soil.

28 posted on 05/28/2002 2:17:11 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Shooter 2.5
Good point, RE: Post #27.
29 posted on 05/28/2002 2:46:06 PM PDT by CWRWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson