Posted on 05/26/2002 1:40:49 AM PDT by stlnative
Edited on 05/26/2004 5:06:34 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
May 26, 2002 -- Investigators believe Chandra Levy was lured to her death by someone she knew or slain by a predator who methodically stalked her, police sources said yesterday.
Evidence collected at the spot where her remains were found points away from her being killed in a random attack while she was jogging, the sources said.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
It's absolutely conceivable since Condit didn't want his mistresses to carry ID when with him. If she thought she was going to be seeing him, it makes perfect sense that she would have left her purse and wallet at home.
I can't think of anyone WHO DOESN"T HAVE CRIMINAL INTENTIONS demanding his/her visitor leave behind all forms of identification and communication as a condition of meeting. It SCREAMS "un-identified body found in xxxx". Perhaps more kids should have read Nancy Drew/ Hardy Boys/ Sherlock Holmes / etc.
Our PC - indoctrinated youth seem incapable of recognizing EVIL when they see it.
He came on to women telling them that he worked for the CIA.
Condit wouldn't have had her murdered unless she knew that he was taking it from both ends.
Sex with an intern or a pregnancy is not a reason for him to resort to whacking her.
OH!! 'ZAT why she had to look up the location of the park before going there? WOW, BRILLIANT bit of deductive logic on the part of the DC police!! (and all this time, I thought Shandra was wandering the streets of DC, wearing running clothes, happened to STUMBLE UPON THE PARK...and IMPULSIVELY decided to go for a jog)
ANOTHER reason the police should have used dogs. I always found it odd that they didn't bother doing that...or doing so many other things...considering this is such a high profile case.
....Pardon me while I adjust my tinfoil hat.
Perhaps they were ordered NOT to any of these things by a superior.
Good Question. He didn't participate on votes on the House floor on Thursday, after Chandra's body was discovered.
True...but what would you think if you and everyone else knew the police were searching all over the vicinity for a dead body? Wouldn't the thought cross your mind "Whooof....dead animal...or what if that's the body they're looking for?"
Was a walkman found with her? If she was "ultra-security conscious" I don't think she would go jogging outdoors in an unfamiliar, remote area, wearing a headset. Someone tried real hard to make it look like she was a random victim while out jogging and planted the walkman (and the jogging duds) as a "prop".... someone who knew her but didn't pay attention to the "little things".
Unless he came back later and buried the body. Remember it was several days before anyone even started looking for her.
Cleaning while moving is normal, but the keyboard? And still there should have been plenty of HER prints around.
Many people have remarked about the police not knowing the differance between jogging pants and leotards.
They think the police must mean her jogging pants. Now I don't have a pair of jogging pants but from
what I have seen of them I don't think a very good knot could be made out of them. On the other hand a pair of
leotards does have a lot of streatch and a very tight knot could be made. Almost like a pair of nylons.
DOES ANYONE HAVE A PAIR OF JOGGING PANTS THEY CAN USE TO SEE HOW EASY
IT IS TO MAKE A KNOT IN THEM AND HOW TIGHT IT WOULD BE?
Now if it turns out it really is a pair of leotards then the question arises, where did they come from?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.