Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dan Rather: Ashcroft is Out to Get Me
Newsmax.com ^ | May 24, 2002 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 05/24/2002 8:03:09 AM PDT by Paul Atreides

Dan Rather: Ashcroft is Out to Get Me

"CBS Evening News" anchorman Dan Rather accused Attorney General John Ashcroft Friday morning of personally ordering Justice Department aides to "sully up my reputation," a charge he leveled while trying to clarify his allegation two days ago that Ashcroft flew private jets last summer because of terrorist threats that he failed to warn the public about.

"Maybe it would be better for (Ashcroft) to spend a little less time trying to sully up my reputation in some way - cover his own backside - and a little more time and let's get this thing straight," the testy CBS anchorman complained during a follow-up interview on the "Imus in the Morning" show, prompted by the controversy over his earlier remarks on the same show.

A few minutes later, Rather elaborated:

"The attorney general's people have been, you know, he's had some of his publicity agents call around newspapers and try to plant some negative stories. And, you know, that goes with the territory, I guess. But I'd had thought he was bigger than that."

Rather quickly clarified the new accusation, suggesting instead that Ashcroft's subordinates, and not the AG himself, were behind the attacks. "And I continue to think (Ashcroft) is bigger than that," he told Imus. "And I think he may have a word with somebody about it."

But in the next breath, the anchorman once again put the onus on Ashcroft personally, complaining that the attorney general shouldn't be spending his time "trying to touch up some reporter he thinks has said the wrong thing - in this case, me."

Imus cited a report by NBC' Pentagon correspondent Jim Miklaszewski, who explained after Rather's Wednesday appearance that the CBS newsman had gotten the story wrong; that, in fact, Ashcroft's decision to fly private aircraft was prompted by personal death threats and not a general terrorist threat assessment.

The CBS newsman responded icily, "I don't think that's where they've done most of their attacking, but let's take that point."

Then Rather suggested that Miklaszewski was merely trying to make him look bad, telling Imus, "First of all about Jim. You say he's an NBC guy, he's a good guy. I note with some interest, you know, he called you very quickly. He didn't call me to say, 'You know, Dan, I think you may be off on this a little bit.'"

The CBS anchor then implied that the NBC newsman was acting out of ulterior motives. "He's got to get along with Russert and Brokaw and those guys - and I understand that," he told Imus.

Rather even quibbled over whether he had asked Imus for more airtime on Friday, or if an Imus producer had invited him back.

IMUS: Well, what happened that prompted your people to request your appearing on the program this morning? I'm unclear.

RATHER: Uh, you or somebody with the program called and said, "Listen, if Dan wants to come on the program we'd be glad to have him." That's what prompted it.

IMUS: Oh, Okay.

RATHER: Also, you know, it's fair to say.....

IMUS: According to Bernard (McGuirk), that's not the case. Somebody called us from you office.

RATHER: Well, then I'll accept that. Then that's the reason we did it. (End of Excerpt)

The Rather-Ashcroft donnybrook was prompted by NewsMax.com's coverage Wednesday of the CBS newsman's comments, which got wide exposure on the Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Bob Grant radio programs, in addition to Imus' own broadcast. (See: Dan Rather: Bush Issued Bogus Terror Alerts to Cover-up 9-11 Bungle)

On Thursday Imus read from the NewsMax report and said that CBS News had requested a transcript to double check Rather's remarks. Generally, neither Imus nor MSNBC, which carries him on TV, transcribes the show.

Friday morning Imus re-read the NewsMax quotes directly to the CBS anchor, which prompted him to launch into a lengthy defense.

Struggling to explain what he meant during the earlier broadcast, Rather said that Ashcroft's statements last July about the nature of the threats against him were confusing, then added, "I don't think reporters can be blamed for what's happened since for asking" if his decision not to fly commercial was tied to more general terrorist threat assessments.

Despite his accusation that Ashcroft was trying to sully his reputation, Rather insisted that the dispute wasn't personal.

"This is not about the attorney general or me. What it's about is how best to defend and protect our country. What it's about is we had 3,000 people killed on Sept. 11."

Then Rather complained:

"On your program, despite what some people have tried to convince folks that I said, I never said that the attorney general was warned specifically about 9-11 threats and therefore covered his own security."

"I did point out the following: That in the summer before Sept. 11, the attorney general, for whatever reason, and I assume rightfully, decided that it wasn't safe for him to ride the airlines. And therefore he laid on - an unprecedented thing to do but let's assume it was necessary - private aircraft to fly him around wherever he went, at, I think, $1,600 an hour."

The CBS newsman continued:

"Now, in other words, when the attorney general heard a threat, it was decided that immediately and expensively, he would be taken care of on the security front - and I'm okay with that.

"What some people are asking - and this is what I reported on your program - and some of the people include the relatives of victims of Sept. 11 - what they're asking is: 'Okay, then when there came threats about the American flying public, there were threats bubbling up all over the place, the public was not told about that and therefore could not make their own decisions about their own security.'"

Rather continued to explain to Imus:

"And on your program I raised what I thought and believe now to be a legitimate question about looking ahead. If the threats in the air are serious enough for the attorney general to say, 'Look, I don't think I better fly airlines,' isn't it reasonable to say, you know, in future, looking ahead, maybe when we have threats against the flying public - that they should be told. Or at the very least the airlines should be told and the pilots should be told."


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: danrather
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last
To: Paul Atreides
"CBS Evening News" anchorman Dan Rather accused Attorney General John Ashcroft Friday morning of personally ordering Justice Department aides to "sully up my reputation,"

How do you sully up the reputaion of a turd?

HEY KENNETH! Set your black helicopter decoder ring in whats left of your herion abuse mind for the next secret message of what Ashcroft is going to do to you!

61 posted on 05/24/2002 9:03:53 AM PDT by Bommer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
WWWWWWAaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!

Rather is a sniveling litle crybaby. I can't believe how little respect I have left for him. He really has self destructed.

62 posted on 05/24/2002 9:06:14 AM PDT by finnman69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawgg
Would you mind explaining the "What's the frequency, Kenneth?" line to me? I used to know what it meant, but I sorta/kinda forgot ... thanks!

g

63 posted on 05/24/2002 9:06:42 AM PDT by Geezerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Geezerette
Apparently back 10 years or so, someone came up to Rather and asked him "Whats the Frequency Kenneth?" Rather asked "What?" and the guy punched rather in the face!
64 posted on 05/24/2002 9:09:24 AM PDT by Bommer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
Dan Rather is sinking into paranoia. He started the conversation in the media, Ashcroft has every right to defend himself in the media.
65 posted on 05/24/2002 9:14:01 AM PDT by RAT Patrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bommer
Thanks!!

Maybe that punch in the face shook something loose in his brain ... like I said, he's been senile for a very long time!

g

66 posted on 05/24/2002 9:18:18 AM PDT by Geezerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
Apparently it has never occurred to Dan Rather to publicly apologize for trying to "sully" Ashcroft's reputation by telling a blatant lie about why Ashcroft avoided commercial planes.

Be a man, Rather, for once in your pathetic little life and publicly apologize to John Ashcroft.

67 posted on 05/24/2002 9:18:58 AM PDT by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
WAAAAAAAAAAAA!
68 posted on 05/24/2002 9:22:28 AM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
Apparently Rather Old's elevator doesn't quite go all the way up to the top floor.

Rather seems a few bricks short of a fireplace.

Rather is a few pecks short of a bushel.

Rather Old is a few pints short of a gallon jug.

Old Rather is a few watts shy of a lightbulb.

Rather Old is a few commies short of a Duma.

Pray for GW and the Truth

69 posted on 05/24/2002 9:26:12 AM PDT by bray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
"...and therefore could not make their own decisions about their own security.'"

Any opinion he opens up on in the future regarding gun control is now an open and shut case,he said I have the right to make my own decision to protect myself.I assume his gun stance is the standard Liberal line,I hope he doesn't read this and think I am out to get him,or anything....he needs to be held to this quote.

70 posted on 05/24/2002 9:26:29 AM PDT by Minnesoootan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides

Castro: Well, what happened that prompted your people to request your traveling to this country? I'm unclear.

RATHER: Uh, you or somebody with the Communist Party called and said, "Listen, if Dan wants to come to Cuba we'd be glad to have him." That's what prompted it.

CASTRO: Oh, Okay.

RATHER: Also, you know, it's fair to say.....

CASTRO: According to Raul Castro Ruz(Cuban VP), that's not the case. Somebody called us from your office.

RATHER: Well, then I'll accept that. Then that's the reason we did it. (End of Excerpt)

71 posted on 05/24/2002 9:26:37 AM PDT by SMEDLEYBUTLER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
I hope Aschroft is out to get the top liar in all of broadcasting communist Rather.
72 posted on 05/24/2002 9:30:50 AM PDT by Texbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMEDLEYBUTLER
There is my LOL for the day!!!! Thanks! I'm set for the weekend!!!
73 posted on 05/24/2002 9:30:58 AM PDT by Minnesoootan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

I think the funniest part of the interview was at the end. Rather was backing out, and Imus said something to the effect of,

"We wanted to let you come on and clear this up, but you just seem to keep shooting yourself"

It was said to roaring applause from the Portsmouth NH audience...and could barely be heard.

74 posted on 05/24/2002 9:40:28 AM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
Fred, you want Ashcroft to fly commercial? He has had death threats...if he gets on, all of the passangers will get off...think about it, would he put an entire plane load of people in danger? I hope not.
75 posted on 05/24/2002 9:49:04 AM PDT by just wondering
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: just wondering
Fred, you want Ashcroft to fly commercial?

I'd be happy to have him fly with me.

76 posted on 05/24/2002 9:55:00 AM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
"Ahh, but the strawberries that's... that's where I had them. They laughed at me and made jokes but I proved beyond the shadow of a doubt and with... geometric logic... that a duplicate key to the wardroom icebox DID exist, and I'd have produced that key if they hadn't of pulled the Caine out of action. I, I, I know now they were only trying to protect some fellow officers..."
77 posted on 05/24/2002 10:05:22 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #78 Removed by Moderator

To: Paul Atreides
Dan's new residence?
79 posted on 05/24/2002 10:06:08 AM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
I look forward to the day when Dan just completely loses it on live television and they have to haul him off in a straightjacket.

Could you tape it for me, please? I haven't watched CBS news since before the Gulf War, so I won't be catching it live, but I'd hate to miss THAT show.

80 posted on 05/24/2002 10:09:29 AM PDT by nina0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson