Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The "no-whites-need-apply" caucus: Pat Buchanan asks, 'Who are they uniting against?'
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Friday, May 24, 2002 | Pat Buchanan

Posted on 05/24/2002 1:31:15 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

Last month, an intriguing little congressional pow-wow was clandestinely held – no press invited – in the Northern Virginia town of Leesburg. It was a 3-day conference, and attendance appears to have been restricted by ethnicity and race.

But this was not a gathering of the Leesburg chapter of the White Citizens Council. It was a conclave of three congressional caucuses – the Black Caucus, the Hispanic Caucus and the Asia Pacific Caucus. And the invitation list appears to have been made up with one provision in mind: No whites need apply.

As described in a front-page story in the New York Times, the goal of this "tri-caucus retreat" was to "create an atmosphere of understanding among groups that have often felt pitted against one another for resources and recognition." But as the caucuses claim to represent only Americans of African, Asian and Hispanic descent, just what were they uniting for, and who are they uniting against?

Now since the Democratic Party has been fairly described as a "collection of warring tribes that has come together in anticipation of common plunder," and all attendees were Democrats, there was lots of talk of a joint looting expedition at the expense of taxpayers.

Attendees pointed to their common front on the $175 billion farm bill, where the Black Caucus demanded an expansion of the food-stamp program, and the Hispanic Caucus demanded restoration of food stamps for immigrants. Apparently, they had jointly triumphed.

Another "shining example" of collusion was in Texas, where Hispanics and blacks joined forces to nominate Tony Sanchez for governor and African-American Ron Kirk for Senate. Capturing the seats lately held by George W. Bush and Phil Gramm for a Hispanic and an African American would apparently be real progress.

But all this raises a question: If it is acceptable for blacks and Hispanics to collude to seize power from white Americans, why is it a violation of civil rights for whites to collude to increase their representation in legislatures at the expense of minorities? If the latter is racism, why is the former progress?

The closer one reads Lynette Clemetson's Times' story, the more it appears this Leesburg summit was not about the politics of aiding the poor and powerless against the rich and powerful. This secret summit was about how folks of Third World ancestry can join forces to seize power and resources from white America.

For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction is a law of Newtonian physics. The same is true in politics. If it has become acceptable for caucuses that represent people of color to join against America's white majority, look for white folks to begin to identify themselves by race, rather than party or philosophy, to preserve what they have. Has the New York Times considered the consequences of what its reporter seems to be celebrating?

All, however, was not harmony at Leesburg. Seems that last January, Latino businessman broke away from the National Minority Auto Dealers Association to form the National Hispanic Auto Dealers Association. Reported without comment. Can one imagine the Times' reaction to a Euro-American Auto Dealers Association?

As Clemetson's story runs on, the Spirit of Leesburg began to reveal itself in the entertainment: "Audience members sat rapt as Sarah Jones, a socially conscious writer and actress ... slipped in and out of accents to portray characters from a Mexican-American labor organizer to a new immigrant from Haiti who scolded listeners: 'God bless America, but not because of you. Remember, your ancestors came here, too.'"

Would it be impertinent to ask who "you" is? And if this us-vs.-them racial rhetoric is acceptable at a Third World caucus-coalition, why is it a hate crime for white folks? Nor was this the end of the fun. Writes Clemetson: "Beau Sea, a Chinese-American slam poet from Oklahoma, raised eyebrows with his confrontational number, 'The Asians are coming'":

We are everywhere

We are programming your Websites

Making your executives look smart

And getting into your schools – for free

And you know what?

It's only gonna get bigger.

Middle America: Hello! From what went down at Leesburg, it is clear the old idea of integration and assimilation, of one nation and one people, is giving way among elites of color to a racial and ethnic spoils system. And as "Anglos" are a minority in California already and soon to be a minority in Texas, perhaps they should start asking what kind of country it is going to be when they are outnumbered nationwide by mid-century.




TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-191 next last
To: AmericaUnited
By ferrous, do you mean that he turns into Iron Man?
41 posted on 05/24/2002 5:08:39 AM PDT by TN Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
Well, we know who Pat is uniting against... Americans of African, Asian and Hispanic descent.

You do not have to agree with Pat … but don’t put words into his mouth. He is making an observation about a meeting in Virginia. If you like, you can post your observations about that meeting.

42 posted on 05/24/2002 5:09:27 AM PDT by bimbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cacique
Bookmark bump
43 posted on 05/24/2002 5:11:13 AM PDT by Cacique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
"This secret summit was about how folks of Third World ancestry can join forces to seize power and resources from white America."

Unity does exist without harmony.
Case in point: Cats with tails tied together hanging over a clothes line. While they think they strive for a common cause, just give these groups time...

44 posted on 05/24/2002 5:51:46 AM PDT by azhenfud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
"As described in a front-page story in the New York Times, the goal of this "tri-caucus retreat" was to "create an atmosphere of understanding among groups that have often felt pitted against one another for resources and recognition." But as the caucuses claim to represent only Americans of African, Asian and Hispanic descent, just what were they uniting for, and who are they uniting against?

Talk about your axis of evil.=o)

45 posted on 05/24/2002 6:46:45 AM PDT by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tuor
That is what it has to do with this. I don't want the US to be caught up in a constant back-and-forth race war, even if it is merely a social/economical/political war and not a military one like in the Middle East.

Ah. Now specifically who is formenting a "race war" here? You are saying that if all the divergent factions move the take over this nation politically, for their own enrichment, the original founders of the nation (European type, whether you like that fact or not) we should just let them, in the interests in order to avoid a "back and forth race war"?

In the spirit of proportion and identifying interests in this debate, to which ethnic group do you belong?

46 posted on 05/24/2002 6:47:30 AM PDT by William Terrell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
Well, we know who Pat is uniting against... Americans of African, Asian and Hispanic descent.

If there were a "Dumbest Quote of the Week" feature on FR, yours would definitely be in its Hall of Fame.

47 posted on 05/24/2002 6:49:17 AM PDT by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #48 Removed by Moderator

To: unknown poster
May 23rd, 2002 and 10-6-99...important dates, to be sure.
49 posted on 05/24/2002 7:12:06 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

Comment #50 Removed by Moderator

To: AmericaUnited
your name is 'america united', and yet you want to divide america up by color.

You accuse Pat Buchanan of being a racist and yet you have no evidence, you're just speaking out of hate.

You said you have great resentment towards those who draw a government paycheck and you extended this resentment to buchanan because he worked for a few years in either the Nixon or reagan administrations. We can't really take you seriously.

51 posted on 05/24/2002 7:32:40 AM PDT by Red Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Thorn11cav
One would only have to look at the minorities place of origin to see what America would become. I would imagine a combination of Africa and Mexico...neither a very encouraging prospect.

While europe is better than africa or mexico, I still prefer the US. Touting european ancestry with it's history of endless wars, socialism, depostism, etc. is less than ideal. Plus Europe can also lay claim to the mother of all despots, hitler.

52 posted on 05/24/2002 7:35:06 AM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
It should be pointed out that the two Cuban American members of Congress, Lincoln Diaz-Balart (R-FL) and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL) got fed up with the agenda of the Hispanic Causus and quit the Caucus in 1995-1996.

Members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus by Congress

53 posted on 05/24/2002 7:35:49 AM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Varda
Hispanics are a pseudo-race. Hispanics have forced the quesiton of "Hispanicness" to be the top level sort on all of the race questionaires. Hispanic "leaders" are the ones doing this, I'm sure many Hispanics don't agree with it. Hispanics want set asides, quotas, holdouts, special voting districts, and basically the full menu of race-based exceptions and booty that Blacks have achieved. Thus, they are acting like a "racial minority" in terms of US law and policy. To say "Hispanics are not a race" is technically correct. Hispanics are a invented grievence group seeking special status, just like Gays.
54 posted on 05/24/2002 7:44:21 AM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: William Terrell
Ah. Now specifically who is formenting a "race war" here? You are saying that if all the divergent factions move the take over this nation politically, for their own enrichment, the original founders of the nation (European type, whether you like that fact or not) we should just let them, in the interests in order to avoid a "back and forth race war"?

Does seem a bit like unilateral disarmament, doesn't it? You have peace right up until the time you are obliterated

55 posted on 05/24/2002 7:49:59 AM PDT by bam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2,All
Pat is right again. He puts first being an American living under our Constitution in one nation under God . This drives the foreign interest first and new world order crowd into a Goebbels smearing frenzy. And you see what happens in some foreign countries when one puts his own country first.

Americans should witness against the Castration of America. Defend those who are defending America.

56 posted on 05/24/2002 8:00:30 AM PDT by ex-snook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bam
It does seem, sometimes, that intelligence and commonsense are mutually exclusive.

57 posted on 05/24/2002 8:02:10 AM PDT by William Terrell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Khepera; elwoodp; maknight; South40; condolinda; mafree; trueblackman; FRlurker...
Black conservative ping

If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)

58 posted on 05/24/2002 8:04:58 AM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William Terrell
Yes, and what about the rights of Replicants Mr. Terrell. :-)
59 posted on 05/24/2002 8:09:11 AM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
"...If it is acceptable for blacks and Hispanics to collude to seize power from white Americans, why is it a violation of civil rights for whites to collude to increase their representation in legislatures at the expense of minorities? If the latter is racism, why is the former progress? "

It is the whites who are fair game. It is time for whites to stand up for their rights, and fight back.

60 posted on 05/24/2002 8:13:21 AM PDT by Don Myers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-191 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson