Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cultural Left Assaults Star Wars
CNSNews.com ^ | May 23, 2002 | C.T. Rossi

Posted on 05/23/2002 5:52:39 AM PDT by Stand Watch Listen

Like one of his embattled Jedi characters, movie magician George Lucas is under assault. Film critics and academics, like legions of post-modern clone-troopers, are assaulting the filmmaker for creating what they view as a politically incorrect vision in his latest movie, Attack of the Clones.

While it is easier to mistake the diminutive Yoda for gargantuan Jabba the Hutt than to mistake the flannel shirt- and blue jean-clad Lucas for a political conservative, the creator of the Star Wars franchise is drawing the same type of rhetorical fire usually reserved for members of the John Birch Society.

A common thread in most of the attacks is the charge that Lucas is socially and artistically in retrograde -- stuck in the '30s,'40s or '50s.

It is very telling that while some may not approve of his art moderne style spaceships, more are fixated on Lucas' sexual mores. Note how Village Voice critic Michael Atkinson launches into his scathing review as he writes: "To answer the most pressing question first: Anakin Skywalker (Hayden Christensen), now a teenager on his way to becoming Darth Vader, does not do erstwhile princess/present senator Amidala (Natalie Portman). . .". Atkinson further derides the movie as "irrelevant preadolescent dreaming" in a review which seems consumed with an unfulfilled sexual appetite.

In a similar vein, Salon.com launches a telling stricture against the movie, "George Lucas is still a virgin, and he wants his audience in the same stricken state." The critic, David Thompson, mocks the on-screen love affair as "early '50s" where the love-struck protagonists "start talking about love and marriage - those classic parental alternatives to desire and pleasure."

Love and marriage? How passe those concepts must appear to the enlightened Left at Salon. To them Lucas is once again portrayed as a man whose vision is trapped in the "dreams and longings of young people in their era of prepubescence."

When not being lambasted for Victorian prudery, Lucas is dodging accusations of racism. Utilizing a stretch of the imagination that would leave X-Files fans incredulous, Wayne State University history professor Jose Cuella is hypothesizing that Lucas has it in for Latinos.

Cuella's theory rests on the premise that the character Jango Fett is the allegorical representation of Hispanics in Lucas' myth-based world. The only problem is that Fett is played by Temuera Morrison, a New Zealander of Maori descent. This, ironically, places Cuella in the same camp as white racists who see all dark-skinned people as some monolithic threat. Mexican or Maori really doesn't seem matter when you are trying to expose The Great White Lucas Conspiracy.

Interestingly enough, Jose Cuella also notes that he thinks that Attack of the Clones is like "those Reagan ads in the 1980 campaign that suggested if Nicaragua went communist, you'd have wild-eyed Mexicans with guns running across the California border." This is of interest because the attacks on Lucas do show a similarity to those launched by Reagan's critics.

Reagan was painted by opponents as a political dinosaur trapped in a Cold War 1950s world. He was also called a racist. But the most frequent charge was that Reagan was an intellectual lightweight. Lucas faces the same charge.

Critic Rick Groen of the Toronto Globe and Mail makes Lucas-bashing a North American venture as he warns with true haughty elitism that you should not turn to Lucas "if you happen to belong to that tiny minority whose idea of fun . . . lies in a story with depth and characters with complexity and a theme with meaning . . .".

Not to be outdone in snobbery, the New York Times review penned by A. O. Scott suggests that "the American moviegoing public will line up out of habit and compulsion . . .". True to form, when the unwashed masses deviate from the tastes of elite media (the supposed champions of people) they are branded as lemmings. The masses are counted as besotted when they vote for Reagan or listen to conservative talk radio, but have them vote for Bill Clinton and they become an enlightened Rousseauan commonweal lending its mandate to the great philosopher-king.

While being politically left-leaning, George Lucas is learning firsthand the secret power behind the dark side of liberals - envy. Lucas has grown too successful not to be a target for the politics of envy. Once a brash upstart young director, he defied studio norms and conventions to create Star Wars.

But now, after a series of hit movies, an empire of successful spin-off companies and a legion of devoted followers, Lucas has become just another middle-aged, rich, white-man enemy.

(C.T. Rossi writes on contemporary culture for the Free Congress Foundation.)



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last
To: Landru
Folks round here refer to the Globe and Mail as the Mop and Pail.
61 posted on 05/23/2002 8:08:25 AM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Fitzcarraldo
"the left cried foul over Watto and accused Lucas of making him a 'money hungry jew'."

Sounds to me like the left profiles people and they are a bunch of racists.

62 posted on 05/23/2002 8:08:43 AM PDT by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
Well, you have to keep in mind a typical leftist love story. Boy and girl meet and exchange a few unintelligible grunts. They have sex. She has an abortion and finds another man and does it again. He turns gay and gets aids and dies.
63 posted on 05/23/2002 8:10:43 AM PDT by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Fitzcarraldo
Well done! And I can guarantee that the left cannot possibly answer that!
64 posted on 05/23/2002 8:12:29 AM PDT by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: smith288
To me it was well worth the price of admission to watch Yoda do his lightsabre fighting scene.
65 posted on 05/23/2002 8:13:42 AM PDT by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: smith288
Who'd have thought that Frank Oz was so agile.
66 posted on 05/23/2002 8:14:16 AM PDT by Wrigley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
So true. As you read through the posts it is evident that there is a LOT that the leftists didn't consider before they made their stupid attacks on the movie. But, no one ever gave the left points for deep thinking.
67 posted on 05/23/2002 8:15:29 AM PDT by Enterprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: xp38
"Folks round here refer to the Globe and Mail as the Mop and Pail."

HA!!
By checking to see where you originally hailed from?
That's really saying a lot.
I mean, the Sidney Herald's Liberal-Socialist *ways* take second to no one!!

...so you would know your Liberal pap when ya see it, eh? {g}

68 posted on 05/23/2002 8:17:47 AM PDT by Landru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Watto had a Jewish nose and a vaguely Greek accent! Was Lucas implying that Jews and Greeks dominated the slave trade?
69 posted on 05/23/2002 8:25:26 AM PDT by Clemenza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: all
By episode VI, he's at least as old as Obi Wan Kenobi, and quite agile.

I blundered here...Bobba Fett would be a couple years older than Luke Skywalker, not Obi Wan, depending on when Amidala concieves.

70 posted on 05/23/2002 8:26:24 AM PDT by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Landru
FR has been a wonderful teacher in that regard. :)
71 posted on 05/23/2002 8:32:52 AM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Wm Bach
It is not wise to pretend there is no need for security, either, merely because some use the term falsely.

When a nation is attacked within its own borders there is a need for security that is not bogus.

It is also not wise to pretend that a great, powerful nation can withdraw from the world without serious and deadly consequences.

72 posted on 05/23/2002 8:42:00 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Ha ha! This article is too rich. I've always said there's a Star Wars quote for every situation in life, and my favorite one lately has been the one Sam Jackson said in EP II: "This Party Is Over" One could say that about the left.
73 posted on 05/23/2002 8:43:45 AM PDT by Darth Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I still care
Ever hear of the British East India Company? And how it operated?
74 posted on 05/23/2002 8:58:04 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Stand Watch Listen

75 posted on 05/23/2002 9:07:14 AM PDT by Jack Bull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
It is not wise to pretend there is no need for security, either, merely because some use the term falsely.

Wise it is for a populace to secure itself individually and en masse, yes. Dangerous it is to surrender liberty, hmmmm? Dangerous it is to abandon self defense to a central authority. There will the dark side take root.

76 posted on 05/23/2002 9:15:57 AM PDT by Wm Bach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
Stay away from fan fiction then. You haven't seen the worst of it...
77 posted on 05/23/2002 9:18:44 AM PDT by coydog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Wm Bach
We are not speaking of self defense but national defense.
78 posted on 05/23/2002 9:33:27 AM PDT by justshutupandtakeit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Fitzcarraldo
When I see Watto, I think "Arafat".

Are you addressing me? You must be respectfully to the Great General Yassir Arafat! BE QUIET!.........................bye bye....

79 posted on 05/23/2002 9:37:26 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: joebuck
And do you know what! Had Lucas decided to include explicit sexual acts in the film this same critic would have written a scathing report on how the movie is awash with moral decay!

It seems all these critics do is criticise movies, when they themselves could not do even half as well if given a chance. Critics is one facet of work that can truly, and should honestly, be eliminated.

Just the other day i was reading his dimwit criticise SpiderMan for being 'too cartoony.' Puh-lease!!!!! SpiderMan is cartoonish because it IS based on a CARTOON! What did he expect them to do, dress spidey is a tux and have him travel by driving a sports car? And maybe adopt a Brit accent and prefer shaken martinis?

80 posted on 05/23/2002 9:49:58 AM PDT by spetznaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson