Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WHY RUSH IS DISGRUNTLED (Bush is advancing the Democrats most liberal agenda )
Rush Limbaugh ^ | 5/13/2002 | rushlimbaugh

Posted on 05/13/2002 3:12:19 PM PDT by TLBSHOW

WHY RUSH IS DISGRUNTLED

On Monday's show, the Doctor of Democracy made a sad diagnosis: "If the Reagan Revolution is not dead, then it's dying." If there was a model that the Bush administration used in establishing itself, it was the Reagan presidency. But now Bush is advancing the Democrats' most liberal agenda items - something particularly frustrating at a time when Bush's popularity would make it easy for him to recruit new conservatives.

Many of you have been critical of Rush's reactions to Bush's actions on spending over the recent months, and we took more calls of this sort on Monday - people who'd convinced themselves that the farm bill made sense or that Bush had some grand strategery at play. Now, Rush could throw his beliefs out the window for a day or two and say things that you might want to hear - like when he endorsed Clinton back in 1992 - but that's not what he does.

Rush can only give you his honest reaction, even when he doesn't like those reactions. That's honesty, folks, and it goes to disprove a key criticism many of the nation's liberals have made of Rush over the years. They've said that Rush is a party hack, and that he'd support the Republican Party no matter what they did. They charged that the EIB Network was simply a tool, that we were in daily contact with the powers that be to get marching orders. Well, that has pretty much been dispelled here: Rush is disgruntled.


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: bush; rush
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 481-486 next last
To: MJY1288
"Now that's a Paul Begala argument if I ever heard one. Hell let me chime in too. If 18% of Americans thought like you, should your thoughts become law? or if 95% of Americans thought you were gay, would that make you a homosexual? Nothing like spinning the facts huh?"

I'm not spinning anything. The founders of this country belived in a small limited federal government. Democracy would never provide that because a simple majority could vote the rest out their house and means of earning a living. Is that what you support?

221 posted on 05/13/2002 11:22:06 PM PDT by blackbart.223
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
A perfect description.
222 posted on 05/13/2002 11:41:16 PM PDT by Pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

Comment #223 Removed by Moderator

Comment #224 Removed by Moderator

To: nopardons
The good, that Rush has done, is in the past.

Think positive.

225 posted on 05/14/2002 6:13:37 AM PDT by Tribune7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: carenot
What Bush and his bots fail to understand is Bush's pandering and trying to buy liberal votes is doing more to tear the Republican party apart than the Dems ever dreamed they could.

The once solid base is crumbling and for ever 1 conservative that will not again vote for Bush because of his pandering and trying to buy liberal votes he has to get 2 liberals or swing voters to replace them.

It is a shame they would rather eat their own for a liberal vote than even try to keep the conservatives that did vote for him or get the conservatives that didnt.

226 posted on 05/14/2002 7:19:33 AM PDT by Native American Female Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: Tribune7
The good, that Rush has done, is in the past.

Rush does a great job of bringing the truth to the forefront! All this is, is the Rush reason he has been so disgruntled of late.

227 posted on 05/14/2002 7:27:26 AM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: seanc623
Well congratulations, I see that you checked the "linguistics" box on the match book cover. I suppose the fear of wasting your vote and the control of your emotions is a bad thing?
228 posted on 05/14/2002 10:25:07 AM PDT by TN Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
well, its 2002 and Bush is for more spending...he expands welfare spending for immigrants and for farmers...and byw he has taken us back in 100 billion dollar annual deficits again...can hardly wait for 2004...lol
229 posted on 05/14/2002 10:35:18 AM PDT by Bill Davis FR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brandon
There are only four or five states where the Senate seat is realistically in play this year. Three of those states are Iowa, South Dakota and Minnesota. That's all you really need to know about why this bill was passed and signed into law.

Exactly. I don't like it either but I still plan to show up and vote Republican this year. The fact is Bush has established some strong conservative credentials in a number of areas, like his judicial nominees and most of his cabinet as well. He's pretty much ignoring his own principles for the moment on economic issues. His view, correctly or incorrectly seems to be that it will help the GOP in November. He's determined not to have Daschle running the show for the last two years of his term. I can't say I blame him.

I saw ABC news last night talking about the tariffs Bush slapped on imported steel. The reporter called him a hypocrite. What are they doing that for? They're trying to get conservatives to stay home in November. I think the Dems are concerned they don't have an issue to get their own supporters to the polls, so the media wants to drive down conservative turnout too.

230 posted on 05/14/2002 10:40:13 AM PDT by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bill Davis FR

231 posted on 05/14/2002 11:31:32 AM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
The title of this thread is misleading. I expected to see ana rticle stating that Bush as in favor of abortion, raising taxes, taking your guns away or expanding welfare.

That and allowing gays to be boy scout leaders and same sex marriages and lowering the age of consent and stopping the WOD

232 posted on 05/14/2002 11:58:31 AM PDT by biblewonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TN Republican
Well congratulations, I see that you checked the "linguistics" box on the match book cover. I suppose the fear of wasting your vote and the control of your emotions is a bad thing?

I don't any fear of wasting my vote; when you vote for what you believe in the only thing you're wasting is the time of those who would browbeat you into supporting their lying candidates. As far as controlling my emotions is concerned I don't have any problem in that area. Not puking every time I hear more GOP lies and backsliding shows tremendous control.

233 posted on 05/14/2002 12:34:56 PM PDT by seanc623
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: Hank Rearden
I was proudly one of those who helped put Skeletor out to pasture. When Gorton voted Not Guilty on perjury during Sh#$head's impeachment, when The Thing was obviously and clearly guilty, that sealed it. Voted Libertarian. Would do so again, twice if I could. 'Bye, you wretched sleazeball Slade! One of these days, the Stupid Party might think twice before they decide that lame old farts like Gorton and Oldbob Dole are "good enough". They're not. Not even close.

Well said!!! Except that the GOP is not stupid at all... they know exactly what they're doing. As I said in an earlier post they can do the math just as well as the Dems. They don't need us in their grand scheme of things (so they think) so let's show them how wrong they are. I hope you have registered Libertarian as well and if not I can give plenty of reasons to.

234 posted on 05/14/2002 12:38:48 PM PDT by seanc623
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Dream on . LOL Libertarians will NEVER do much of anything at all, but be spoilers. Ron Paul is a joke ! He has done zero, nada, zilch, B+NOTHING but make himself irrelivant and given people here, someone to hold up as an elected Libertarian ; except that he couldn't get elected dog catcher as a Libertarian, so ran as a Republican. He is a JOKE ; a sad one, at that.

It's sad that you have to resort to name calling when confronted by the truth. I think the tone of your comments betrays the prevailing attitude of the GOP. Politics is a game to them, not about principle but popularity and controlled much the same way as organized crime operates.

235 posted on 05/14/2002 12:44:56 PM PDT by seanc623
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: carenot
I will stay home before I vote for the lesser of two evils.

Please don't do that; not when there are so many good men and women who are seeking office with the Libertarian or Constitution parties. If you don't have that choice where you live why not run for office yourself? Let's do something positive for our country!

236 posted on 05/14/2002 12:52:40 PM PDT by seanc623
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk
That and allowing gays to be boy scout leaders and same sex marriages and lowering the age of consent and stopping the WOD

Allowing gays to be Boy Scout leaders and forcing the Scouts to accept them are two very different things. As a Libertarian I totally oppose the government (through the courts or Congress) forcing any group to accept people they don't want to. I believe in our 1st Amendment guarantee of freedom of association. I disagree with you however on the other issues. Lowering the age of consent is an interesting point. Do you realize that many of the pioneers of our Old West would be considered child rapists under today's laws? Government should not be enforcing private morality-period.

237 posted on 05/14/2002 1:01:27 PM PDT by seanc623
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: seanc623
Do you realize that many of the pioneers of our Old West would be considered child rapists under today's laws? Government should not be enforcing private morality-period.

Yes I do realize that. You probably believe that prostitution should be legal then and that it should start at any age that the girl decided to run away. It is certainly not the governments business if a 12 yearold runs away and starts turning tricks. I don't agree that it is not the governments business.

238 posted on 05/14/2002 1:32:59 PM PDT by biblewonk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: lasereye
Exactly. I don't like it either but I still plan to show up and vote Republican this year. The fact is Bush has established some strong conservative credentials in a number of areas, like his judicial nominees and most of his cabinet as well. He's pretty much ignoring his own principles for the moment on economic issues. His view, correctly or incorrectly seems to be that it will help the GOP in November. He's determined not to have Daschle running the show for the last two years of his term. I can't say I blame him. I saw ABC news last night talking about the tariffs Bush slapped on imported steel. The reporter called him a hypocrite. What are they doing that for? They're trying to get conservatives to stay home in November. I think the Dems are concerned they don't have an issue to get their own supporters to the polls, so the media wants to drive down conservative turnout too.

I agree with you about the media's motivation but keep in mind that if Bush weren't giving them an opportunity to call him on his hypocrisy they would have a much harder time convincing conservatives to stay home.

239 posted on 05/14/2002 2:05:29 PM PDT by seanc623
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk
Yes I do realize that. You probably believe that prostitution should be legal then and that it should start at any age that the girl decided to run away. It is certainly not the governments business if a 12 yearold runs away and starts turning tricks. I don't agree that it is not the governments business.

I believe children belong to their parents until the age of 18. That's why I support parental control of education through either vouchers or tax credits. I certainly do not support 12 years prostituting themselves either. Parents not government bureaucrats have the right to control their children's lives until the age of 18.

240 posted on 05/14/2002 2:42:54 PM PDT by seanc623
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 481-486 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson