Posted on 05/06/2002 6:17:00 AM PDT by Spin
In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends. --Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.
The purpose of the press is to let the truth be known to the people. But having seen report after report of the sex scandal in the Catholic Church, I am sorry to say that yet again the media is failing us by refusing to tell us that the primary problem within the church is an epidemic of homosexual priests. We know that most victims of these crimes are young boys, and the perpetrators are grown menwhy is it so hard to say that this epidemic is a direct result of homosexuals being given authority that they should not have?
Weve heard for some time now about priests who are openly homosexual, but apparently few within the Church seemed to see a need to resolve this issue. Its even more troubling, then, that the media is so unwilling to report something that has long been known. Of course we know that the media is basically liberal, and has the intent of promoting a biased agenda. But youd think that at least some would have the good sense to report honestly when the physical and psychological safety of so many children are at stake.
If the media, the most far-reaching informational source, refuse to accurately report this predominantly homosexual scandal, then the truth is being concealed and this problem may never be resolved. If something isnt done, homosexuals will continue to gain authority over our children and country, and the effects will be disastrous.
For the rest of the article, click here.
So, you don't believe it's possible to be chaste before marriage?
That sex outside of marriage is okay, because if you don't, you'll get "pretty messed up"?
ROTFLMHO !!!
Bravo for a clear, concise post. You could be the 'Rummy" of the PC battle over whether or not those who practice same sex sexual trysts deserve 'special' protections and acknowledgements. What a joke this hype over SAD (those who practice homosexuality) folks. I agree with you....those inflicted with this disease deserve help, certainly not a boost. Because they prey on the vulnerable-like little boys-they should be kept FAR from groups of children, whom they see as possible sexual outlets. Pretty sick stuff.
SAD folks should be kept out of schools, out of leadership positions in the Boy Scouts, out of counselor facilities that counsel youth, out of the priesthood and other leadership organizations that provide for youth. etc. Anyone who is openly homosexual should be prepared to suffer the consequences society deals out. There is nothing honorable about promoting perversion. Nothing.
Let´s look at gay behavior as defined by two gays, Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen Ph.D., authors of After the Ball: How America will Conquer its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90´s (1989).
In Chapter Six, they outline ten categories of misbehavior, drawn from their own experiences, wide reading and thousands of hours of conversation with hundreds of other gays. Their contention is that the gay lifestyle, not gay sexuality mind you, is the pits. They want gays to improve their image by addressing what is wrong with a lot of gays. (276)
What follows are some highlights. As you read this, ask yourself if there is another human community, including the Mafia that could make these generalizations about itself. Ask yourself if we haven´t caught this disease, or at least the sniffles.
The authors say a surprisingly high percentage of pathological liars and con men are gay. This results from a natural habit of self-concealment, and leads to a stubborn self-deception about one´s own gayness and its implications.
They say gays tend to reject all forms of morality and value judgments. Gay morality boils down to If it feels good, I´ll do it! If a gay feels like seducing a trusted friend´s lover, he´ll do it, justifying it as an act of sexual freedom and the friend be damned.
They say gays suffer from a narcissistic personality disorder and they give this clinical description: pathological self absorption, a need for constant attention and admiration, lack of empathy or concern for others, quickly bored, shallow, interested in fads, seductive, overemphasis on appearance, superficially charming, promiscuous, exploitative, preoccupied with remaining youthful, relationships alternate between over idealization and devaluation.
As an example of this narcissism, the authors say a very sizable proportion of gay men who have been diagnosed HIV positive continue to have unprotected sex.
They say the majority of gays are extremely promiscuous and self-indulgent. They must continuously up the ante to achieve arousal. This begins with alcohol and drugs and includes such forbidden aspects of sex as wallowing in filth (fetishism and coprophilia) and sadomasochism, which involves violence.
They say many gays indulge in sex in public bathrooms and think it is antigay harassment when it is stopped. Many think they have a right to importune straight males, including children.
Many gays are single minded sexual predators fixated on youth and physical beauty alone. When it comes to the old or ugly, gays are the real queerbashers. Disillusioned themselves, they are cynical about love.
Relationships between gay men don´t usually last very long. They quickly tire of their partners and fall victim to temptation. The cheating ratio of married´ gay males, given enough time, approaches 100%.
Even friendships are based on the sexual test and hard to sustain. Unattractive gay men find it nearly impossible to find a friend, let alone a lover.
The authors say gays tend to deny reality in various ways: wishful thinking, paranoia, illogic, emotionalism and embracing crackpot ideas.
Is there any doubt that this behavior is sick?
No but most feel deep down that they are traducing nature or society even as society is trumpeting the irrelevance of homosexuality to anything significant. Because they feel they are on the other side, then it is much easier to do other "unnatural" things. And, if society is wrong about plain homosexuality, which taboo runs so deep, then it should be wrong about further ramifications.
An alcoholic who takes one drink finds it much easier to take another. A clerk who embezzles a little (the boss doesn't need it) has no moral defense against taking a little more and then a lot more. Once you cross that line, the resistance to going farther across is much less than the resistance to crossing it in the first place.
Many open homosexuals identify themselves by that characteristic above all others and make expressing themselves sexually their raison d'etre.
Not everybody, just homosexuals. Or do you mean "everybody that means anything to me"?
It's clear that a lot of homosexuals struggle with a great deal of resentment toward non-homosexuals. Part of this is displayed in the activist attempts for social and governmental recognition and acceptance of so-called "gay marriage" - a sort of parody of heterosexual relationships. Some even admit that this is about proving they are "just as good" (maybe even better) than heterosexuals.
You are implying that ALL priests are homosexual at present. That is not a valid observation. Homosexuala are 2-4% in the general male population and possibly 10% of priests. Or do you believe that without the restraining factor of homosexual priests the heteros will run riot in the sacristy?
So just how does the presence of the homosexuals keep heterosexual abuse in check?
There are always dark tales of such perversion in countries that are institutionally anti-Catholic and Mexico, since their Revolucion, is institutionally anti-Catholic. It falls into the same category as that great authority on Judaic philosophy, theProtocols of the Learned Elders of Zion.
Monogamy is simply neo germaine to homosexuality. Monogamy is the system suited for rearing children. Homosexuals do not have children of their own unless they buy them or get them unnaturally.
Homosex is unnatural use of sexuality because it is not productive and involves only one's self and "partners." It is a closed system that shuts out society and God. It is sinful.
If one is Christian then one accepts that God's creation is run by logical rules. The sexual act normally performed, results in continuation of humanity, the bringing into the world of more souls. One cannot be a flouter of rules and actually consider himself a practicing Christian except in that he may believe that it is true but that he chooses to contravene the truth. Then he could, perhaps, be sort of a Christian if a perverse sort.
Not so. There are many medical conditions (and prescription drugs) that reduce the libido to zero. Sex becomes no longer of interest at all.
BTW, I'm really not stalking you today.
Interventional forms and onanism, yes. Thes are not such a public problem among Christians because contraceptionists as contraceptionists do not molest children or others over whom they have authority. Contraception is more a private sin. It is generally not flaunted.
That's not the whole truth. There is also the unitive purpose of sex in marriage. The two purposes are equally valid and important.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.