Posted on 05/04/2002 7:26:18 AM PDT by ElisabethInCincy
Msnbc is reporting That The palestinian court may release The 2 prisoners today which were part of deal of arafats release..
He can take them by force of arms.
Arafat: "I am General Arafat.
We will do what we want.
To murder Jews and Americans
freely without any past, present or future accountability."
"They are sitting in an office like me and you-honored and respected-and they have complete freedom of movement," said Arafat in an exclusive interview with Arab Satellite television channel Al-Jazeera.
So in other words, our guys are idiots and Arafat is (yet again) a liar.
D'ya think we disrupted the main bomb factory?
Although the IDF isn't ten feet tall and I don't think holds a candle to the U.S. Marines, these snipers have been doing an outstanding job of just killing fighters, not Christians.
Yes. The only successful suicide bomber since then was from Hebron, which was not included in the original operation. Then they went into Hebron for a few days, and since then, so far, so good.
U.S., Arafat Spat Over Prisoner Deal New York Daily News | 5/04/02 | BRIAN KATES
Posted on 5/4/02 2:05 AM Pacific by kattracks
A dispute about the fate of two accused terrorists surrendered in the deal that ended the Israeli siege of Ramallah erupted yesterday after aides to Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat said the U.S. promised to release the prisoners.
White House spokesman Richard Boucher denied that the release of Ahmed Saadat and Fuad Shobaki, both senior Palestinian officials, was part of the U.S.-brokered agreement that ended the siege of Arafat's headquarters Thursday. "The arrangement is to keep these people in custody," Boucher said.
Israel accuses Saadat of masterminding the assassination of Israeli Tourism Minister Rehavam Zeevi in October and says Shobaki financed a large shipment of weapons from Iran.
The two were among six surrendered by Arafat and placed in a Jericho jail under American and British supervision.
The controversy could complicate Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's meeting Tuesday with President Bush at the White House and compound concerns over Secretary of State Powell's plans for peace talks this summer.
As with all Mideast diplomacy, there are many complications.
Sharon has sworn not to negotiate with Arafat and is expected to tell Bush when they meet that Israel will not hold talks until after violence has stopped.
He also is expected to present his own peace plan based on a long-term interim agreement with the Palestinians.
Arafat is expected to travel to Egypt to meet with Arab leaders, including Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah, who conferred with Bush last week on a peace strategy. It was not clear, however, whether Sharon would allow Arafat back into the West Bank especially if any terror attacks occur while he is gone.
But Arafat welcomed Powell's peace conference, saying Palestinians would "consult all the brethren Arab leaders over this conference before it convenes."
A time and place for the talks has not been set.
FWIW, someone expanded on this a bit on Fox the other day: these "monitors" are not there to prevent escape, only to "report" the escape. They even speculated that the US "monitors" would not be military personnel, or CIA, but "State Department" personnel, and would most probably be "unarmed."
Thought: just as the UN personnel in the Pali camps are 90% Palestinian, perhaps the State Department has contracted out to the Palis for this assignment...
Someone explain to me the difference between Bush's policy regarding Palestinian terrorists and Clinton's policy?
What's next? Is Laura going to go to France to kiss Arafat's wife?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.