Skip to comments.
Summary of Great French Surrenders
Undergraduate Historian ^
| R.McChristian
Posted on 04/23/2002 6:53:28 AM PDT by punishingone
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-150 next last
To: punishingone
"Bonjour, you cheese-eatin' surrender-monkeys."
To: punishingone
I personally prefer the term 'Cheese-eating surrender monkeys.' It seems to cover most of the bases of French politico-military history.
3
posted on
04/23/2002 7:04:44 AM PDT
by
Faeroe
To: Faeroe
really? I thought they fought of the muslim incursion into europe during the 9th century without which you & would be speaking arabic..... but recently.......
To: punishingone
Actually, as funny as it is to pick on the French, nearly every nation in Europe has surrendered at one time or other.
And we've all lost wars (US -- Vietnam, UK -- it's worldwide empire, etc.)
5
posted on
04/23/2002 7:09:33 AM PDT
by
jlogajan
To: Faeroe
Do they have a lot of French in Wisconsin? I know they like chesse and are very liberal. Sounds like Frenchmen. Nuke'em!
To: punishingone
Thats not entirely accurate as every French victory is ommitted. For example, where is his famed battle at Austerlitz? At any rate, the French actually did not have such a defeatist attitude and unimaginative military until after Verdun in WWI.
To: punishingone
Hmmmmmm. Where would we be without the hard-fighting Admiral DeGrasse at Yorktown? How about Lafayette? And Napoleon was no pushover if I remember correctly.
8
posted on
04/23/2002 7:20:18 AM PDT
by
Timmy
This thing reads like Walter Mondale's summary of 'The Failures of the Reagan Years'. Every lost battle is spun into a cowardly defeat. Every won battle or war is omitted. Even WWI, where the French held off the German's initial assault, fought heroically against the brunt of their army for four years, endured unimaginable casualties; both civilian and military, and finally forced the Germans to sue for peace, is presented as a French defeat. It makes for a cute joke, but it is silly to mock French military history as a series of embarassments. Might as well mock the Germans' "cowardice" at Stalingrad or the Italian "surrender monkeys" at Cannae.
To: jlogajan
Perhaps a review of terms is in order. A signed treaty ending hostilities is much different that the typical French belly-up, weapons down, march to the sea and shell the hospitals as you leave the harbor surrender. "Cheese-eating surrender monkeys" is quite accurate.
HOWEVER, I do have respect for the Legion Etrangere, but they are a different type of monkey.
10
posted on
04/23/2002 7:29:34 AM PDT
by
Khurkris
To: StockAyatollah
Do they have a lot of French in Wisconsin? I know they like chesse and are very liberal. Sounds like Frenchmen. Nuke'em! Birthplace of the GOP?!?!?! Bite your tongue:)
11
posted on
04/23/2002 7:39:12 AM PDT
by
GypsyBob
To: jlogajan
I don't think you can legitimately claim that the U.S. lost the war in Vietnam. We never suffered a battlefield defeat and our nation was never attacked and occupied. At worst, I think you could say we made a tactical (and ungraceful) retreat.
12
posted on
04/23/2002 7:45:38 AM PDT
by
Hootowl
To: jlogajan
We didn't "lose" the Vietnam War ... we just quit fighting it. Most Vietnam Vets (including myself) are offended by that myth.
To: clamper1797
We probably didn't have to lose the Vietnam war. But we did lose it.
14
posted on
04/23/2002 7:50:29 AM PDT
by
jlogajan
To: jlogajan
And we've all lost wars (US -- Vietnam, ...
A better example would be (US - The War Between the States...
To: jlogajan
BRAVO SIERRA
Comment #17 Removed by Moderator
To: clamper1797
Okay, you're the type that needs to think we won a glorious victory in Vietnam. Yes, yes, of course. And you are king of the universe -- and all the Hollywood starlets want to marry you -- and you may have already won the 10 billion dollar Publisher's Clearing House sweepstakes ...
The rest of us see that Vietnam fell into the enemy hands -- a defeat for us.
18
posted on
04/23/2002 7:54:16 AM PDT
by
jlogajan
To: Hootowl
The German nation was never attacked or occupied in WWI, but the Germans still lost that war. Napoleon never suffered a battlefield defeat in 1812, but that campaign still must be regarded as a losing one. And of course, the British were never attacked or occupied during the American Revolutionary War, but they still lost that one. By the same token, America defined its war objectives in Vietnam as the establishment of a capitalist, democratic, Vietnamese state. We failed to achieve this goal, and by that definition 'lost' the war.
To: jlogajan
Did we sign a surrender? ...
are we or were we occupied by the North Vietnamese?
Do we now speak Vietnamese?
Do we all now live in communes?
Is our government now overseen by the Vietnamese?
We also pulled out of Bosnia (kinda) Does that mean we lost that "war" too. Losing a war requires surrender. If we wanted too we could have turned North Vietnam into a glass parking lot. Voluntarily pulling out of a conflict is not "losing" a war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-150 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson