Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Lincoln, Robin Hood..who next?
1 posted on 04/21/2002 4:57:32 PM PDT by codebreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
To: All
http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_107.html?menu=
2 posted on 04/21/2002 4:59:14 PM PDT by codebreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: codebreaker
Shouldn't you have posted this on the cheese forum?
3 posted on 04/21/2002 4:59:26 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: codebreaker
There is a huge differance in being gay and being a homosexual. I have no doubts that Good ole Bill was gay, but find it next to impossible to think of him as a perverted sodomite homosexual.
9 posted on 04/21/2002 5:10:51 PM PDT by Alas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: codebreaker
There are reasons for thinking that Shakespeare was what we would now call bisexual. This was not a concept that existed in Shakespeare's day, so not only would he not have not identified himself on that basis, he wouldn't even have used such a word for himself.

This was the era of the wars of religion, when persons with the wrong views, like Catholics under Elizabeth, were threatened with persecution and worse. We know Shakespeare's father was a Catholic even after that became illegal, and there is good reason to believe that Shakespeare himself was educated as a Catholic when that was illegal. He was certainly not an open Catholic during his adult career, but I think there is no way to know what his real private opinions were. The sympathy he exhibits for Catholic kings of England in his history plays and for Catholic priests in plays like Romeo and Juliet suggests to me he remained a Catholic at heart. But, whether or not that is true, his family history and his youth gave him reason to sympathize with Catholics, who were regarded as the arch-traitors in Elizabeth's England. That gave him skepticism and sympathy for all sorts of characters, including villains.

And, in his day, religious loyalties and sympathies counted for far more than sexual orientation. Even a semiopen pederast like Christopher Marlowe identified himself more as a freethinking atheist than as a pederast.

11 posted on 04/21/2002 5:17:10 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: codebreaker
The link is inoperative, but if "Shakespere" was in fact Lord Oxford, than he was most certainly gay.
13 posted on 04/21/2002 5:19:05 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: codebreaker
Abraham Lincoln and William Shakespeare are gay?? Jesus Christ will be next. This totally reeks of Tina Brown and her ilk!
14 posted on 04/21/2002 5:20:33 PM PDT by MoJo2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: codebreaker
NEWS FLASH

William Shakespeare is DEAD

15 posted on 04/21/2002 5:23:25 PM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: codebreaker

BFD


17 posted on 04/21/2002 5:26:40 PM PDT by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: codebreaker
 New Evidence Emerges to Prove William Shakespeare may be Gay

You don't prove 'may.'

19 posted on 04/21/2002 5:40:42 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: codebreaker
Oh no, here we go again. Won't the fairies ever give-up in trying to pervert our history? I wish these deviants would just shut up, lock their doors and b***er each other out of our sight.
30 posted on 04/21/2002 6:04:28 PM PDT by Merdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: codebreaker
"Hom(e)o, Hom(e)o, where for art thou, Hom(e)o?"
35 posted on 04/21/2002 6:14:17 PM PDT by Thumper1960
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: codebreaker
Shakespeare wasn’t gay although he was a thespian when he was younger.
39 posted on 04/21/2002 6:24:11 PM PDT by Gaston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: codebreaker
I do believe Shakespeare might have written this:

Or not.

41 posted on 04/21/2002 6:27:45 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: codebreaker
Lincoln, Robin Hood..who next?

Don't you know the rule about historical figures? Once the autobiographocal gold has been mined by the first few generations of scholars, the late-comers "discover" that they were either gay, consumed by an STD, or were at the very least engaged in adulterous affairs.

42 posted on 04/21/2002 6:35:02 PM PDT by BradyLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: codebreaker
There is a war going on, who cares if Bill was a fag?
49 posted on 04/21/2002 7:11:48 PM PDT by Joe Boucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: codebreaker
Such salacious garbage is vitally important to the pro-buggery set.

The fact that the Bard is quite possibly the greatest writer of the Enlgish language ever to have lived is not nearly as important to these twits as the tenuous possibility that he got perverse satisfaction from rear-ending other men.

53 posted on 04/21/2002 7:19:24 PM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: codebreaker
New Evidence Emerges to Prove William Shakespeare may be Gay...ain't the post-modern deconstructionist movement great? Find one little item about some character and from it spin a complete fantasy "proving" whatever you want others to believe about your subject - I'm betting this is all based on the fact that Shakespeare is depicted as wearing a fluffy collar in some his supposed pictures....
70 posted on 04/21/2002 9:03:06 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: codebreaker
Well, let's see. Robin Hood was fictional (and therefore had no sexual relations). They aren't even positive of who Shakespeare was but someone claims to know that he was gay?

Let me guess, anything to do with the fact that women's roles were played by men?

73 posted on 04/22/2002 2:39:24 AM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: codebreaker
Evidence shows more filth and degradation posthumously bestowed upon people who can’t defend themselves. Alexander the Great, Abraham Lincoln, Aristotle, Socrates and Jesus Christ all lumped in to making the same base and repugnant behavioral choices in order to justify perversion. Sad people desperate for validation.
82 posted on 04/22/2002 4:57:39 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: codebreaker
This is by no means new. Someone was coming up with strange theories about whether the "dark lady" of the sonnets was a man more than 50 years ago. Considering that the facts solidly known about William Shakespeare could barely fill one typed page and include (1) he never spelled his name that way, (2) he was married, and (3) he had children, I would have my doubts about this theory.
93 posted on 04/22/2002 6:55:34 AM PDT by DonQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson