Mainly, my point was how the media plays fast and loose with the numbers to their (liberal) advantage.
We are the base should conditions get to the point of outrage over the left/anarchist/whatever's shenanigans or another terrorist attack. There now is a "base" of expertise that has arranged press conferences, arranged permits, hired infrastructure (stage, generator, sound system, porta-potties, etc), understsands rally logistics - and the list goes on. Never, ever, through out the baby with the bath water. We are in this for the long term and we hope many of you will be there with us.
I understand, and sympathize.
Speaking of C-Span and liberal advantage, they had a call in thing this morning on the subject of....
RIGHT WING MEDIA BIAS!!
Sounds to me like C-Span fell right in with Dashless and GetaHeart.
With the exception of a few 'startling' opinion polls, right before the 2000 election, indicating the the American voter - translation: viewer - believed the media had a LEFT WING BIAS...WHEN during the 8 years of Clinton's reign did major media outlets bother agonizing over media bias OF ANY TYPE???
That's a rhetorical question. I know you ALL know the answer.
Whether the Patriots Rally for America had in attendance what some media called "a handful" or others called several hundred is irrelevant. The people who braved the elements and the warnings of violence from the anti-war groups are all to be commended. They came to the rally, listened to the inspiring and outstanding speakers, flew their flags proudly and defiantly in the face of the America-hating leftist/communist/anarchist protesters and rallied in support of the U.S. and our troops fighting the war on terrorism.