Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California .50 Caliber Ban Alert (CA) Your action needed!
Calnra.org ^ | April 14, 2002 | None

Posted on 04/15/2002 7:28:05 AM PDT by .38sw

HEARING TUESDAY April 16, 2002
Note: The hearing was rescheduled from April 2
California .50 Caliber ban
TUESDAY April 16

Note: The hearing was rescheduled from April 2

******PLEASE REPOST WIDELY************

AB 2222, which is a .50 caliber ban has its first hearing on April 16 in the Assembly Public Safety Committee. PLEASE FAX AND TELEPHONE THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS AND URGE THEM TO VOTE AGAINST THIS MEASURE AND AB2902. E-MAILS ARE NOT AS EFFECTIVE,BUT IF THAT IS ALL YOU CAN MUSTER, DO THAT. CONCENTRATE ON THE DEMOCRATS.

It would treat .50 caliber rifles as machine guns, banning future sales and requiring current owners to dispose of them or register them as destructive devices (virtually impossible in California). For information on this bill, see the Fifty Caliber Shooter's Association Policy Institute at www.fcspi.org. They will have some details on the bill and how to argue the case against it.

In the same committee on the same day is AB 2902 (Koretz), which allows the AG to re-test guns on the SB 15 so called "safe gun" list and recall models that fail later. Naturally, their idea of a failure and testing is bogus.

To get all the latest "gun" news visit www.calnra.org. To join this alert list, send an e-mail to calnra-subscribe@yahoogroups.com


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Culture/Society; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: banglist; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
Before you start bashing California, remember: there are members of the US Congress and Senate from other states that are trying to take this national. This kind of anti-second amendment abuse and bigotry has got to stop. I'm getting just a little tired of it...

Go to the link for the contact information for the committee members. And please, no threats. That just gives them more, um, "ammunition".

1 posted on 04/15/2002 7:28:05 AM PDT by .38sw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bang_list


2 posted on 04/15/2002 7:34:59 AM PDT by Joe Brower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
Thank you for pinging this. I just got my email to the "public safety" committee rejected. The delivery failure notice said that the address was not in the directory. I notified one of the editors of Calnra.org that this is the case. Perhaps the committe changed their address? Phone and FAX folks. I'll be faxxing from my computer today. Freep away.
3 posted on 04/15/2002 7:58:56 AM PDT by .38sw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: .38sw
I would not waste my time with emails. By and large, they are a waste of time. Snail-mail is best, phone calls second, faxes third. I'd say at this late hour, phone calls and faxes are the way to go.

Here is the contact info as posted on the CALNRA.ORG website:

FULL ALERT!!
 

California 

AB2222 - .50 Caliber Ban

AB2902 - Firearm Testing

HEARING TUESDAY April 16, 2002

Note: The hearing was rescheduled from April 2

                California .50 Caliber Ban HEARING 
                TUESDAY April 16

                Note: The hearing was rescheduled from
                April 2

                ******PLEASE REPOST WIDELY************

                AB 2222, which is a .50 caliber ban
                has its first hearing on
                April 16 in the Assembly Public Safety
                Committee. PLEASE FAX AND 
                TELEPHONE THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS AND
                URGE THEM TO VOTE AGAINST THIS 
                MEASURE AND AB2902. E-MAILS ARE NOT AS
                EFFECTIVE,BUT IF THAT IS ALL YOU CAN 
                MUSTER, DO THAT. CONCENTRATE ON THE
                DEMOCRATS.

                It would treat .50 caliber rifles as machine guns, 
banning future sales and requiring current owners to dispose of them 
or register them as destructive devices (virtually impossible in 
California). For information on this bill, see the Fifty Caliber 
Shooter's Association Policy Institute at www.fcspi.org. They will 
have some details on the bill and how to argue the case against 
it.

In the same committee on the same day is AB 2902 (Koretz), which
allows the AG to re-test guns on the SB 15 so called "safe gun" list 
and recall models that fail later. Naturally, their idea of a failure
and testing is bogus.

To get all the latest "gun" news visit www.calnra.org. To join this 
alert list, send an e-mail to calnra-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
 

                Committee Phone Number: (916) 319-3744 

                Committee Email 
                public.safety@assembly.ca.gov

                ASSEMBLY PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE

                Committee Member
                District
                Phone Fax

                Carl Washington, Chair 
                Dem-52
                (916) 319-2052 
                (916) 319-2152 FAX 

                Jay La Suer, Vice Chair 
                Rep-77
                (916) 319-2077 
                (916) 319-2177 FAX

                Richard L. Dickerson 
                Rep-2
                (916) 319-2002 
                (916) 319-2102 FAX

                Fred Keeley 
                Dem-27
                (916) 319-2027 
                (916) 319-2127 FAX

                Gil Cedillo 
                Dem-46
                (916) 319-2046 
                (916) 319-2146 FAX

                Manny Diaz 
                Dem-23
                (916) 319-2023 
                (916) 319-2123 FAX

                Jackie Goldberg 
                Dem-45
                (916) 319-2045 
                (916) 319-2145 FAX


Contact us with your comments and articles: rweller@cris.com

4 posted on 04/15/2002 8:07:41 AM PDT by Joe Brower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: .38sw
For those in the California state assembly who wish to ban these weapons, I'd sure like to see them demonstrate how easily the $5000 weapon (minus the $600-$1000 scope) can be purchased (as well all know the market is just plain flooded with .50 cals). I'd also like to see a demonstration of just how easily a criminal can rob a liquor store with the 30lb+ monster.

HA!

5 posted on 04/15/2002 8:19:22 AM PDT by realpatriot71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .38sw
Isn't communist incrementalism wonderful?

'All your guns are belong to us'

I hope you can get enough people to give them hell. Good luck, we'll be next.

6 posted on 04/15/2002 8:32:04 AM PDT by Cap'n Crunch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .38sw
--no, you are right. If ONE state gets a 50 ban, count on most of the others to do it. The tyranny two class society goons in control of this junta do NOT want private people to own weapons that are actually somewhat effective against their mechanised military, should tyrannical efforts necessitate a firm saying "no you don't" at some theoretical future desparate point. The 50 is not all that swift in that regard, but, then again, compared to any other shoulder fired weapon out there that any ole joe sixpack can just go purchase, it is far and away the "best" and cheapest.

With that said, it would be cool if some machine shop/ firearms manufacturer like RIGHT NOW came up with a wildcat, like a .475 mag, based on the .50 BMG cartridge.

7 posted on 04/15/2002 8:50:19 AM PDT by zog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zog
--no, you are right. If ONE state gets a 50 ban, count on most of the others to do it.

Just like every other state has an "assault weapons" ban?

California is a lost cause. No one in their right mind stays in the State. The sooner it falls off into the ocean the better.

8 posted on 04/15/2002 8:52:56 AM PDT by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: zog
The .338 Lapua magnum is considered the primary alternative to the .50BMG: a much more manageable round with comparable performance.

What many don't realize is that the .50BMG is actually a poorly designed round: it was not designed for "sniping" (such uses were discovered & adapted by civilians), and the case size is actually much larger than the bore diameter warrants (you just can't burn all that powder fast enough to be useful; it suffers from the "6 pounds of s*** ina 4 pound bag" syndrome).

While the .338 Lapua round may not have quite the same punch as a .50BMG, it does so from a far more efficient package and still fits most of the overhyped fears described by the Brady Bunch. I've seen the holes it makes in 3/4" armor plate at roughly 1/2 mile distance - quite impressive ("hot knife thru butter"). The maker of the most feared .50BMG rifle, the Barrett M82A1, is already well on their way to making a comparable .338 Lapula product.

The .50 cal ban must be stopped, partly because it will just pave the way for banning .30 cal. Just as the .50 cal ban does not differentiate between the massive .50BMG round and the merely adequate .50AE round, the minds pushing this ban will apply exactly the same hysterical arguments for banning .30 cal because of the powerful .338 Lapua and take out the relatively paltry .30-30 in its wake - and this time there will be precident that will differ by just one digit.

The great irony of anti-gun legislative progress is the remarkable technological progress made to compensate. Making your opponents ticked-off AND efficient is unwise.

9 posted on 04/15/2002 9:32:21 AM PDT by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: zog
With that said, it would be cool if some machine shop/ firearms manufacturer like RIGHT NOW came up with a wildcat, like a .475 mag, based on the .50 BMG cartridge.

That would be a sweet cartridge. It would also keep some gun makers in business if this idiotic bill were to pass, in California and elsewhere.

10 posted on 04/15/2002 9:38:23 AM PDT by arm958
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
The .50 cal ban must be stopped, partly because it will just pave the way for banning .30 cal.

I don't think .30 cal will ever be seriously targeted for banning (but I could be wrong). Being the mainstay of North American hunting, It has too many "sporting" purposes. What worries me is if these gun grabbing idiots start getting technical and ban cartridges based on "energy at impact", or some such b.s. Of course, if they tried that, millions of us would willingly and proudly become the non law-abiding, armed opposition. I fear it's only a matter of time before we are pushed too far.

11 posted on 04/15/2002 9:48:08 AM PDT by arm958
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
What many don't realize is that the .50BMG is actually a poorly designed round

I didn't know that, and I thank you for bringing it to my attention.

12 posted on 04/15/2002 9:50:41 AM PDT by arm958
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2; Squantos; Travis McGee
While the .338 Lapua round may not have quite the same punch as a .50BMG, it does so from a far more efficient package and still fits most of the overhyped fears described by the Brady Bunch. I've seen the holes it makes in 3/4" armor plate at roughly 1/2 mile distance

.338 Lapua bump.

13 posted on 04/15/2002 9:51:24 AM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FreeTally
--I dunno. I'm old enough and remember what the gun laws used to be. I once humped a .22 openly on the schoolbus to junior high for a swap for some crap with a friend. I used to be able to waltz into the store as a kid and my choice of enfields or mausers or asakas for 9$. Could order a pistol mailorder through the back pages of outdoor life. carbines were 20 bucks from the civilian marksmanship deal and it was easy as snot to get one.

It ain't like that now in ANY state, some are worse than others, that's all. None of them, including vermont, come close to how it used to be, although vermont is far and away the best. Here's an example, don't believe me, start a company, make brand new more than 10 shot mags for anything, not even guns, not even assault rifles, just mags, then open a storefront and try to sell them retail to someone who ain't a cop or dotgov, to just anyone who walks in, see what happens, any state. Your particular great state. See? Inch by inch, it's everywhere, just the speed of change is different.

They been doing it piece by piece, the larger states like cal and new york and illinois are always the canary states, they see what flies and what don't. Once they see it flying there, eventually it gets to other states, again, some quicker, some slower. New Jersey bans almost all assault rifles now don't they? I think the last decent one you can own is the garand, but maybe I'm wrong on that, don't remember now. I don't keep up with all the states so i can't comment. i'll agree cal is one of the worst, but they also got the most votes as a block in the fed house, too. they also control the mass media with their partners in NYC and washington. what happens there is vitally important for everyone, whether we like it or not.

Anyway, I got mixed feelings on cal, there's still a ton of decent folks there, they just got out voted and out bred and out spent. Between the coastal nimrods and the illegals, now into illegals as their number three growth industry, they are surrounded numerically. What choice they got really? Start shootin? You first, be my guest, I'll watch for now. I'm skeptical all this talk of lines in the sand I've heard for decades now is more than talk, or it would have happened already, and it hasn't. What are they supposed to do? Exactly? Just move, then move again, and move again? Vote? Re -read earlier description of what gun laws used to be, been plenty of 'votes' since then, all over heck, it hasn't mattered in the long run. One step forward someplace, 5 steps back is what has happened mostly.

Folks are hanging on to their jobs now, wherever they are living, ain't one hooman bean I know actually believes the governments BS unemployment figures or economic figures, I don't care if they are dems or repubs or purple lipped zulus, NO one believes the government.

Folks in cal are just stuck between their size rock and the hard place we all have in common, that's all. Just their rock is bigger and moves faster than most states rocks.

14 posted on 04/15/2002 9:53:18 AM PDT by zog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
BTTT!
15 posted on 04/15/2002 9:53:51 AM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: zog
I like the way you think Zog.
16 posted on 04/15/2002 9:59:03 AM PDT by arm958
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: zog
A little more searching turned up:

- .408 Cheyenne Tactical cartridge, which "approaches several of the ballistic characteristic of the .50 Browning cartridge and in some cases, exceeds them. It has the advantage in being 33% lighter than the .50 Browning cartridge."
- Leitner-Wise .499 "firing a 400gr bullet at 1600 fps. Designated 12.5x40mm, the proprietary round feeds from standard AR-15 magazines in a single column with 14 rounds in a 30 round magazine."
- .457 Wild West Magnum
- .45-70 Gov't

New rounds are being invented all the time. Ultimately, whatever limit is legislated will promptly be met with new ammo milled to just .001" under that limit - and likely with superior performance.

17 posted on 04/15/2002 10:01:02 AM PDT by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: arm958
Rifles are outright banned for hunting in many areas (shotgun slugs only due to limited range). Some calibers under .30 are viable for hunting. Between those two points, the anti's will have someplace to herd hunters - with manufacturers happy to sell new "legal" calibers.

Don't forget that after successfully demonizing the ".50 sniper rifles", the anti's will "discover" that REAL snipers use .308!

18 posted on 04/15/2002 10:09:16 AM PDT by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
yep, sure a lot of wildcats out there. deal is, it has to be common, that's what's cool about the 50 (sorta) or 308 or 30 06, it's so common it ain't funny. I think for most folks sticking to an actual either a common hunting caliber or a common military caliber is the best bet. For something that has been around for a long time as an alternative to the 50, I guess the H&H 375 comes the closest to something decent enough. It starts to get into ford/chevy/mopar discussion at some point. I tell folks if they got to have one rifle, just one, then make it a 308 of some brand, that don't matter that much. Does the job,. ain't weird or hard to find or expensive, and has better range and impact than the current paramilitary forces infantry standard 223. The cartridge itself will out perform 99% of most folks eyeballs and shooting skills.
19 posted on 04/15/2002 10:16:00 AM PDT by zog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz ;Travis McGee ;Texasproud;Harpseal
Shhhhhh gotta keep some things secret ! .338 lapua in a Dakota Longbow 76 is one of em......

Keep it to yourself Laz !

Stay Safe !

20 posted on 04/15/2002 10:21:31 AM PDT by Squantos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson