Posted on 04/06/2002 11:18:28 AM PST by Hellmouth
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:07:39 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Ronald Mallett, a physicist at the University of Connecticut, believes he knows how to build a time machine - an actual device that could send something or someone from the future to the past, or vice versa.
He's not joking.
(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...
Thank you, but I would prefer NOT to know what Hillary does with all those pimentos. I don't think I could ever look another martini in the col...er...face.
Shame on you. This is family forum! How dare you mention pimentos?
I hate to be the "fly in your soup" so to speak, but viewing the light of a reflected image would show you the present, because it took that light 20,000 years to make the round trip. A telescope only allows us to look into the past when viewing light directly from or close to the source of that light. Now, if you could find a way to accelerate the reflected light, then your concept is feasible.
I've been checking daily for the new images to start pouring in when the new optics in the Hubble get cranked up, there is no telling what we will see and learn from that, and it should be any day now.
No. Either I wasn't clear or your thinking is flawed.
It would take 1,000 years for the light from earth to reach the reflective surface on a distant planet (which is 1,000 light-years away). It would then take that same light 1,000 years to be "reflected" back to earth - - and this is obviously the same light which would then enter the lens of the telescope. Making the image (of long-ago earth) presented by that light 2,000 years old. Hence, it would be a "picture" of earth as it was 2,000 years ago.
No "fly in the soup" here.
Regards,
LH
But thinking is fun, and ladies, it does not give you wrinkles.
Um, given the current age (57) of our intrepid scientist, computers filled entire buildings when he was 10, and Bill Gates was not yet born.
Not meaning to be a "downer," Xerox was an excellent buy in the early days. Poor-houses are full of people who said: "why pay all that money for those big machines when you've got carbon-paper?"
"Baby, I've looked into it. There's a gas shortage and a flock of seagulls. That's about it."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.