Skip to comments.
Austin Police WON'T Arrest People Only For Immigration Status (would hurt trusting relationship..)
KEYE Texas ^
Posted on 04/05/2002 5:05:57 PM PST by chance33_98
Austin Police Won't Arrest People Only For Immigration Status
The U.S. Justice Department, which controls the Immigration and Naturalization Service, says it can't handle the 7 million immigrants currently in the U.S. Therefore, it is considering a proposal to allow local police to do their job for them. Nearly 8 months ago, 19 hijackers slipped through Americas immigration security net committing the most devastating terrorist attacks on American soil. Now, controlling immigration in America has become drastically more important. Austin police say adding immigration duties would undo the trusting relationship local police have built with immigrants. Police say illegal immigrants often do not report crime, for fear they will be deported. Austin Police Assistant Chief Rudy Landeros says, "Our officers will not, and let me stress this because it is very important, our officers will not stop, detain, or arrest anybody solely based on their immigration status. Period." Austin police say however, they will continue to cooperate with federal agents who have criminal warrants for illegal immigrants.
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: donutwatch; immigrantlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161 next last
I see. They don't want to break the trust of people breaking the law.
To: chance33_98
So, we wonder why people don't respect law officers, who pick and choose which laws on the books are supposed to be enforced...how convenient.
To: Sabertooth; mystomachisturning; Tancredo Fan; WRhine; *immigrant_list; donut watch;Lion's cub
Bump for an update
To: chance33_98;
Victoria Delsoul; Pelham; Travis McGee; Joe Hadenuf; sarcasm; harpseal; RonDog...
Austin Police Assistant Chief Rudy Landeros says, "Our officers will not, and let me stress this because it is very important, our officers will not stop, detain, or arrest anybody solely based on their immigration status. Period."
Landeros is openly declaring his malfeasance of duty, thus encouraging further lawlessness.
Fire him.
To: chance33_98
The people of Austin are not going to go to the city council meetings and express their outrage en masse so what do they expect?
5
posted on
04/05/2002 5:17:59 PM PST
by
Arkinsaw
To: chance33_98
Well....if these
"law enforcement officers" don't want to enforce the
LAW OF THE LAND, I suggest that
we taxpayers fire them and find someone willing to do the job. End of discussion.
Personally, I am getting sick and tired of the limp wristed, weak-kneed candy-a$$ed idiots that we have on the public payroll, telling US what they will and won't do. If they don't care enough to carry out their assigned duties, then get rid of them! NOW!!!!!!
6
posted on
04/05/2002 5:19:06 PM PST
by
Howie66
To: chance33_98
Might be more to this than what we read. In a mediumish small town I know (will remain nameless) the local badges have also declined to bust Immigration Status. It's a matter of deep distrust of the feds.
It's an attitude of "we live here, we vote here, and no g.d. suit thousands of miles away is gonna' tell us how to police anymore than how to teach, how to farm, how to ranch!"
The attitude is totally devoid of any feelings either way for immigration, legal, pending or any other variance.
This attitude also prevails with federal direction for traffic signage. It's our way, or no way.
In this case the immigrants are getting a free ride because of the antipathy towards the feds.
And then there's always the fed mandates on forestry and grazing rights.................in the middle of a blizzard, if the feds came out with a study that approved cold-weather gear, I think some locals would strip naked just out of defiance.
Now there's an image: where would a naked sheriff tuck the Glock?
Amy
7
posted on
04/05/2002 5:19:41 PM PST
by
AzJP
To: AzJP
If I were the Justice Department I would order the Police Chief to do his job, and when he didn't slap him with a writ of mandamus and haul his ass into court where he could be fined or jailed.
8
posted on
04/05/2002 5:23:13 PM PST
by
gaspar
To: AzJP; chance33_98; SaberTooth
...... no ..... suit thousands of miles away is gonna' tell us how to police anymore than how to teach, how to farm, how to ranch .....!
Can't argue that local is best -- but when are your cops and [America's New Welfare Rich!] your farmers and your ranchers gunna send back the dough the feral-gummint steals from all the rest of US and send out there?
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm????
To: gaspar
Good for you.
You prefer big government over home rule, fine.
Just be careful where you live and work with that attitude. If a town hires a cop to protect the citizens against violent crime and leave non-violent crime to the lawyers and courts, you'll be a very unpopular person with your attitude in that town.
Homerule has adherents. Some will remember that's how we got ride of King George.
You wouldn't do well in a town that still idolizes Barry Goldwater.
Amy
10
posted on
04/05/2002 5:31:24 PM PST
by
AzJP
To: Howie66
My take on Austin Police's refusal to arrest on immigration violations is much the same as yours. Where do these twits get off thinking that they can pick and choose which laws they are going to enforce? You'd think that they would want to maintain the best relationship with those that pay their salary. Perhaps that's it; the cops are getting a bigger contribution from the illegals. Just speculating.
11
posted on
04/05/2002 5:31:39 PM PST
by
1lawlady
To: Brian Allen
Right after the feds return what they took from us.
Amy
12
posted on
04/05/2002 5:33:02 PM PST
by
AzJP
To: chance33_98
I heard this at my Republican club meeting last night. Our Congressman was there and said that Bill Clinton's Justice department put into place the ruling that local law enforcement could not interfere with the feds arresting illegals. Supposedly, local law enforcement could do it prior to Clinton's ruling. So, it's not just Austin police who won't arrest them.
13
posted on
04/05/2002 5:36:27 PM PST
by
Slyfox
To: Brian Allen
Oh yeah, your reputation is widespread.
You're the "pilot" guy, right?
When are you gonna' return all the corporate welfare money that paid for all the airports etc? Hmmm?
Life is such a mandela, eh?
Amy
14
posted on
04/05/2002 5:37:12 PM PST
by
AzJP
To: AzJP
The base point is though, you have cops telling you it is their job to enforce laws, and the rest is up to the judge. Yet they themselves may decide not to obey the law. It does not matter the excuse, I may disagree with some laws strongly, but I will obey them. You the change the system through the system.
To: chance33_98
Austin police say adding immigration duties would undo the trusting relationship local police have built with immigrantsWTF? Have they built trusting relationships with car thiefs too?
To: 1lawlady
Perhaps that's it; the cops are getting a bigger contribution from the illegals. Considering how the Mexican drug cartels work ---paying off the police and politicians, you're probably right.
17
posted on
04/05/2002 5:39:16 PM PST
by
FITZ
To: Sabertooth
Nearly 8 months ago, 19 hijackers slipped through Americas immigration security net committing the most devastating terrorist attacks on American soil. What immigration security net are they talking about?
To: chance33_98
La Migra has its xenophobic goons everywhere, let them work for their fed tax confiscation pay..
To: Joe Hadenuf
What immigration security net are they talking about?
The invisible one, must be a 'black' project they are not talking about...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson