The president seeks peace without abandoning principle.Posted on 04/04/2002 8:06:56 PM PST by Pokey78
The president seeks peace without abandoning principle.
Well that was one big, broad, bold statement from our president on the Mideast yesterday. His Rose Garden speech seemed to come late in the drama, but it may turn out that George W. Bush spoke at the right moment--when the action had reached its peak, with the Church of the Nativity surrounded, the tanks rolling through Nablus and on to Hebron, the watching world exhausted, and the rush of adrenaline that had sustained both sides the past week wearing off, leaving some combatants shaky and wondering no doubt if there wasn't a way back from the brink.
Mr. Bush's speech said there was. And he demonstrated it by seeming to take a step back himself from his own previous statements. Although his people will soon be calling it not a step back but an elaboration or extension of his previous position.
His announcement that he would send Secretary of State Colin Powell to Israel next week appears to be risky--certainly all the foreign-affairs professionals are calling it a big gamble--but it isn't, really. Things are so bad in the Mideast that if Mr. Powell makes any progress at all, sending him will seem a brilliant move. If Mr. Powell fails, who wouldn't have failed? It's the Mideast. And what would failure look like, anyway? Just more of the same.
As for how Mr. Powell's presence will be perceived, the Arab world, which understands him to be one Bush cabinet member who is not reflexively pro-Israeli, will not complain; the Israelis understand him to be representing a president with a history of commitments to Israel; the Europeans see him as an American who has a detached view of the Mideast.
And Mr. Powell is a national and international hero. He has the power of the unhated man. His presence has force because his persona is dense with meaning: hero, leader, minority member who struggled to triumph in white institutions, a dove by nature who knows how to fight. He knows how to say tough things in a boring way, a great talent in diplomacy. He radiates warmth but is a reactor cool at the core. He can lower the temperature just by walking in. And the world press both admires and enjoys celebrating him.
So he's a good man to send at a time such as this. And just as Mr. Powell needs Mr. Bush in order to continue as secretary of state, Mr. Bush needs Mr. Powell for the signals his presence sends, and for the stature he lends. They need each other, know it, negotiate around it without acknowledging it, and work well together.
As for Mr. Bush's speech, it was impressive and, I suspect, clever. What was needed was a definitive statement of America's understanding of, and views on, what is happening in the Mideast, but a statement that didn't make things hotter or more passionate or encourage action that would not be helpful. Mr. Bush needed to give the world a sense of the context as he sees it. What was not needed was rhetorical flight, and he didn't take one. He needed words that weren't each of them little hand grenades but words that had a simple and definite meaning that became sentences that, strung together, built a suspension bridge of thought and well-meaning.
That's what he did. Neither the Palestinians nor the Israelis hold the immediate guilt; a fanaticism which "induces" an 18-year-old Palestinian girl to strap a bomb on her back and blow herself up, killing a 17-year-old Israeli girl, is the evildoer. "Suicide bombers are not martyrs," Mr. Bush said, "they're murderers, and they undermine the cause" for which they stand.
He said, essentially, that both sides in the struggle have a case, a plea that can be made to the world's conscience. He made it clear he remains a supporter of Israel's right to defend itself and to assert its right to nationhood and freedom. "I speak as a committed friend to Israel." But Israeli settlement activity must stop, and Israel should "lay the foundations of future peace" by halting its incursions into Palestinian areas, and in fact withdrawing from them. He asked Israel to show "a respect" for those who feel humiliated by the actions of its soldiers.
This was a step back from Mr. Bush's previous statements that Israel had a right to defend herself, period.
At the same time Mr. Bush made no bows to Yasser Arafat, saying he had "betrayed the hopes of his people" by failing to strongly or steadily oppose terrorism. Mr. Bush warned that terrorism could "blow up" the best chance for a Palestinian homeland. He challenged the leaders of Arab countries to play a constructive role, and warned Syria and Iran that they must "stay out" of the conflict.
At the end of remarks some bravado: He expects better leadership in the Mideast, and "I expect results."
The most surprising aspect of Mr. Bush's remarks was that they were so specific. They were not bland and vague as one might have expected from a diplomatic statement by a president to a world that fears a widening war. His remarks were highly specific and informational, full of citations on United Nations resolutions and support of past peace plans that could become a blueprint for progress. Which means his remarks gave everyone--the Palestinians, the Israelis, the Europeans, the foreign-policy community, the media, the Arab street, the Israeli street--something to think about, chew over. As most people can't think, chew and shoot at the same time, his specificity may turn out to have been a contribution.
But in general, at times like this, an American president simply has to speak. He must come forward with a voice that reflects the thinking of a great nation that is trying to be fair. It is good he finally spoke, good that he was comprehensive, good that he launched a new mission. To use the word good three times in a piece about the Mideast after the past six months feels . . . pretty good.
The most disturbing thing I've witnessed in a long time has been the dramatic defections of conservatives from Bush. Conservatives are ordinarily awfully rational about matters of import. In this case, many seem much more impatient than common sense demands.
Warm regards,
Sean.
Maybe we should keep a score of the Americans it saves.
Not a surprise, not unexpected. I feared that possibly in the end, Gore might have been better for he is merely a fool.
Amen!! We all sit in front of our monitors second guessing, and assuming we know better...based on what we have been told by a dubious press. Remember, we only know what we see on TV or read. Bush has the best minds and most experienced participants in the world to rely on as advisors. If we only knew what he knows, and what burdens he must shoulder, most here would faint at the ramifications. He balances politics, public approval, misdirections to our adversaries, his own personal opinions, Congressional interference, a media that despises him, differing opinions among his inner circle, world opinion, forging alliances with other leaders...all while worrying about our own economy and this little war we have of our own.
We're allowed the luxury of tunnel vision. "By God, if Bush doesn't do this or that on an issue, he's a RINO, sellout, wussy, coward, globalist, NWO'er, money-grubber or..." fill in the blank. It's sickening.
For the first time in 8 years, we have a President we can trust. So trust him. Not all is as it seems; or as it is as reported in the press. His ability to stumble into brilliance is not an accident.
Not a surprise, not unexpected. I feared that possibly in the end, Gore might have been better for he is merely a fool.
Which also implies that you would rather have Gore in there for any and all actions that the President has taken since 911? If so, you should resume your medications. You should also review the actual records of how senior actually treated Israel. Far better than x-42. For which American Jews never seem to remember. Rather than spewing out the dogma of the left-wing press, try reviewing the FACTS before opening your mouth.
He's about as white as I am but all you ever hear is how he's black this and the first black that.
It's stupid really.
He doesn't. Mentions of "blackness" come from others, who for whatever reason cannot stop themselves from posting stupid race comments whenever his name comes up. See this thread.
Amen. If we relied on the press reports, we would think that the whole speech was nothing but Bush dressing down Israel.
I have also heard him speak about hard work, the pursuit of excellence, and the opportnities he found in the army.
The press has difficulty seeing anything else, apparently, since they are the source for all these comments.
For the first time in 8 years, we have a President we can trust. So trust him. Not all is as it seems; or as it is as reported in the press. His ability to stumble into brilliance is not an accident.
Thanks for your comments. I am appalled by all the whiners on FR lately. It surely is tunnel vision. You have outlined in one sentence all the concepts, problems and players that Bush has to consider. And then he has to be strong enough not to waver when the criticism starts before he has even finished speaking.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.